Trying to Get Pregnant

TTGP Board Discussion Voting Post **Results Posted**

2

Re: TTGP Board Discussion Voting Post **Results Posted**

  • It appears that one of my comments is something that at least one person is upset by. I'll own the comment that references Mean Girls, about not using the "If you get a BFP, no need to post here, just move on to your BMB" phrase. I really do see that as a bullying move that is not inclusive and lacks a generosity of spirit and a growth mindset. It just screams, "You can't sit with us!" to me. If someone told me that on a board after I made a mistake I would think I wasn't welcome back even if I then took the time to read the Newbie thread and follow the rules. Others may disagree and that's fine, but that's my non-anonymous opinion. 
    DD #1: April 2017
    DD #2: May 2020
    Baby #3: EDD May 2023; MC October 2022

  • Loading the player...
  • If the random drive-by person asking us if they're pregnant are in fact pregnant then they aren't trying to get pregnant anymore and don't belong on a TTGP board. 
    @NamelessAria I claimed the "Mean Girl" comment above. I see your point here. I understand that it says if you get a BFP...but I think the language is just really off-putting. But I'm not in favor of a rule about this; I just won't use that language myself. Instead I'd say something like, "It's against the TOU to ask if you are pregnant or post pictures of tests. We only post about BFPs in the Weekly Grad Thread so that those who choose to can avoid them."

    *TW loss, maybe? I'm still unclear about how much you have to talk about loss to warrant a TW. 
    I am early in this TTC game and have not experienced loss, and know that those who have done so or who have been TTC for a while may feel differently, but I really like seeing BFPs. Often this board makes it seem like no one ever gets pregnant (maybe because many people simply disappear when they do). When I'm feeling that way I go to the community on Glow (there are pretty much no rules over there) and look at BFPs to my heart's content. I agree that BFPs should be posted in the weekly grad thread (I like the suggested name change to BFP thread, but then I am worried people might post pics of their tests which is against the TOU) but I would be in favor of having more of them (BFPs, not threads). But if others disagree I'll just keep going to Glow for that, which is fine.   
    DD #1: April 2017
    DD #2: May 2020
    Baby #3: EDD May 2023; MC October 2022

  • izza2izza2 member
    yaeger07 said:
    If the random drive-by person asking us if they're pregnant are in fact pregnant then they aren't trying to get pregnant anymore and don't belong on a TTGP board. 
    @NamelessAria I claimed the "Mean Girl" comment above. I see your point here. I understand that it says if you get a BFP...but I think the language is just really off-putting. But I'm not in favor of a rule about this; I just won't use that language myself. Instead I'd say something like, "It's against the TOU to ask if you are pregnant or post pictures of tests. We only post about BFPs in the Weekly Grad Thread so that those who choose to can avoid them."

    *TW loss, maybe? I'm still unclear about how much you have to talk about loss to warrant a TW. 
    I am early in this TTC game and have not experienced loss, and know that those who have done so or who have been TTC for a while may feel differently, but I really like seeing BFPs. Often this board makes it seem like no one ever gets pregnant (maybe because many people simply disappear when they do). When I'm feeling that way I go to the community on Glow (there are pretty much no rules over there) and look at BFPs to my heart's content. I agree that BFPs should be posted in the weekly grad thread (I like the suggested name change to BFP thread, but then I am worried people might post pics of their tests which is against the TOU) but I would be in favor of having more of them (BFPs, not threads). But if others disagree I'll just keep going to Glow for that, which is fine.   
    Post pointing people toward their BMB have always been phrased similar to this, at least from what I've seen:
    "If you get your BFP, there's no need to update us. Please move on to your BMB. Otherwise, check out the WTO/TWW and newbie guides and feel free to jump in."
    Or
    "Posting pee sticks is against the TOU; please move on to your BMB."

    Me: 30 | DH: 34 | DSS: 14 | DS: 4
    PG #2, EDD 10/12/2023

  • @izza2 just wanted to give you a shout-out for the work you put into this.  Thank you!!
    me . late 30's | h . early 40's | < 3 . 2013

    *siggy warning*

    ttc#1 . jul 2015
    mmc . mar 2016
    dx PCOS (non-IR) / subclinical hypothyroidism . summer 2016
    tx metformin, levothyroxine, LP progesterone, femara + trigger + ti . fall/winter 2016
    BFP .  jan 2017
    DD .  oct 2017

    ntnp #2 . summer 2018
    mmc x2 . sep 2018 & may 2019
    RE workup, dx MTHFR mutation, ultimately unexplained . summer 2019
    surprise BFP .  aug 2019
    DS .  may 2020

    dx Hashimoto's 2023
    ttc #3 . feb 2023
    mmc . apr 2023
    mmc x3 . mar/jul/aug 2024
    dx elevated nk cells
    tx ovasitol, levothyroxine, baby aspirin, LP progesterone, lovenox, prednisone, femara + ti . jan 2025
    BFP . mar 2025

  • @izza2 Thank you for all of your hard work!! It is so appreciated.
  • Thank you @izza2 for all the effort.  I'm relatively new here but really enjoying the community.  I just wanted to add that I think we can find a happy medium where new question threads are welcome to keep the board interesting and so there is more to see than WTO and TWW threads.  In the pinned TTGP guide we can encourage new posters to search before posting a question and we can also remind people of this if they post a FAQ.  

    I am also really looking forward to unpinning some of the threads.  There are a lot up there.  
    History and blog link in spoiler
    2016 - dx with super low ovarian reserve; failed cycle with clomid, failed IUI, 
    2017 - egg retrieval #1 - 3 eggs, 0 embryos appropriate for transfer; ER #2 2 eggs, 0 embryos on day 3; ER #3 1 egg 0 embryos
    moved to donor egg in summer 2017; 35 eggs retrieved; 19 fertilized; 9 total embryos
    Fresh transfer Dec 2017= BFP!  baby boy born 8/22/18

    May 2019 - surprise natural pregnancy ended in MC
    Nov 2019 FET; MC at 9 weeks
    May 2020 FET; BFN
    July 2020 FET; CP treated with methotrexate
    Oct 2020 BFP! 

    Take a look at my blog


  • I agree with @mrsdaddario, I think Monday would probably be best. People are most active during the work week anyway
    Me: 30  DH: 31
    Married 2010
    TTC since Nov. 2015
    BFP#1: 2/8/16
    MC: 3/19/16  :'(
    BFP#2: 9/3/16   EDD: 5/17/17

    mommy to the cutest rescue mutt ever.
    my chart
  • I agree with @mrsdaddario, I think Monday would probably be best. I think people are most active during the work week anyway.
    Me: 30  DH: 31
    Married 2010
    TTC since Nov. 2015
    BFP#1: 2/8/16
    MC: 3/19/16  :'(
    BFP#2: 9/3/16   EDD: 5/17/17

    mommy to the cutest rescue mutt ever.
    my chart
  • izza2izza2 member
    Mondays sound good.

    As of right now, I'm battling with trying to get the intro thread unpinned. If staff decides not to unpin it for their own whatever reasons -- do we still want to go ahead and do a weekly intro thread (as they suggested to me), or just keep intros the way they are?
    Obviously we wanted to change it because right now the intros are just amassed and it's awkward for some to even think of replying to individual intros, and various other reasons.

    Hopefully our wishes are honored, but if they're not - thoughts on that matter?

    Me: 30 | DH: 34 | DSS: 14 | DS: 4
    PG #2, EDD 10/12/2023

  • I think we should still start the weekly intro thread if the massive one isn't unpinned and see how it works out.
  • ChaoticWolfChaoticWolf member
    edited July 2016
    TheJerilu said:
    @izza2

    RE: If you get a BFP, no need to post here, just move on to your BMB

    What up, ladiezzzzzzzzz.  As the original writer of the Weekly Grad thread, I'll go ahead and 2cents this.  When the weekly grad thread was started, there was the overwhelming attitude of "NO DRIVE-BYS THAT WILL BE THE WORST" as it had just gotten its kick off.  Community vote at that time was to have the "regulars only", even to the point where one particular post got flamed to heck and back for getting her BFP first cycle, despite posting daily here during that time.  Hence why we've added the "quantity and quality" language, hence why that line was there, etc etc.

    I've gone with what the community attitude was, but I can just say that I am super duper happy to remove that requirement and exclusionary language.  I've always been of the opinion that if you think a particular bfp post within the grad thread is a drive-by, then just... scroll past and move on your day.  So!  That line and anything similar is getting removed.

    When I post tomorrow, I will update the language accordingly (although I will keep the "this is not the thread to ask if you are pregnant" part because TOU).  Eh, I may post it late tonight so I don't forget.

    Also, izza2, I'd be happy to write the basic paragraphs to the other thread - you were talking about noob intro thread, yeah? I'll do it in the morning while I'm running reports at work. :)
    *Lurker here and TW in Siggy*
    To be fair though, I remember that flaming (if you're talking about the one back in late April), and there was a fairly good reason she got that attitude. She literally had 14 total posts excluding her grad thread posts (that was the only thing that stuck out in my mind about that flaming lol). It was just that no one knew her; no one could place her. There'd been almost no interaction between her and the community. 
    Previously PaukMeKiande
    Surprise BFP/MC February 2011 
    BFP May 16th 2016
    EDD January 25 2017
    DD born January 30 2017
    Surprise BFP/MC April 2017
  • izza2izza2 member
    TheJerilu said:
    @izza2

    RE: If you get a BFP, no need to post here, just move on to your BMB

    What up, ladiezzzzzzzzz.  As the original writer of the Weekly Grad thread, I'll go ahead and 2cents this.  When the weekly grad thread was started, there was the overwhelming attitude of "NO DRIVE-BYS THAT WILL BE THE WORST" as it had just gotten its kick off.  Community vote at that time was to have the "regulars only", even to the point where one particular post got flamed to heck and back for getting her BFP first cycle, despite posting daily here during that time.  Hence why we've added the "quantity and quality" language, hence why that line was there, etc etc.

    I've gone with what the community attitude was, but I can just say that I am super duper happy to remove that requirement and exclusionary language.  I've always been of the opinion that if you think a particular bfp post within the grad thread is a drive-by, then just... scroll past and move on your day.  So!  That line and anything similar is getting removed.

    When I post tomorrow, I will update the language accordingly (although I will keep the "this is not the thread to ask if you are pregnant" part because TOU).  Eh, I may post it late tonight so I don't forget.

    Also, izza2, I'd be happy to write the basic paragraphs to the other thread - you were talking about noob intro thread, yeah? I'll do it in the morning while I'm running reports at work. :)
    *Lurker here and TW in Siggy*
    To be fair though, I remember that flaming (if you're talking about the one back in late April), and there was a fairly good reason she got that attitude. She literally had 14 total posts excluding her grad thread posts (that was the only thing that stuck out in my mind about that flaming lol). It was just that no one knew her; no one could place her. There'd been almost no interaction between her and the community. 
    But if her 14 posts were daily or almost daily or whatever from the beginning of her time here - then she was an active member who was trying to be a part of the community and got lucky on her first month here. It's one thing if someone literally comes to the board just to post their BFP, I see why that would be flamed and would get backlash. But, if someone tried, then they tried. You can't fault someone for getting their BFP on their first cycle and not being in the community for months upon months before that happened for them.
    That's like saying "you didn't spend more than one month TTGP so you're not welcome here because you weren't really trying".

    Me: 30 | DH: 34 | DSS: 14 | DS: 4
    PG #2, EDD 10/12/2023

  • izza2izza2 member
    @LadyMillil @ahrains - Thanks, ladies. I guess we'll just start the weekly intro thread this coming Monday and hope that the BGs decide to go with what the community decided upon.

    Me: 30 | DH: 34 | DSS: 14 | DS: 4
    PG #2, EDD 10/12/2023

  • izza2izza2 member
    I've said my peace and I'm personally done with it. The poll results are over and the consensus was to let everyone post their BFPs in the grad thread, regardless of whether they're "regulars" or not, and skip over ones from randos.
    I'm not personally beating a dead horse of a topic any more than has already been done, so have at it.

    Me: 30 | DH: 34 | DSS: 14 | DS: 4
    PG #2, EDD 10/12/2023

  • @KirstinH88 I think that's a great start! I don't have anything to add at this point. 



  • @virginiaham I also didn't feel comfortable with that wording and question in general. One big reason why I wanted to pass it through everyone. I know I did see a lot of people include previous losses in their intro which is why I included it, but you are right, they can offer up that information elsewhere if/when they are ready. Thank you!
    Me: 29 DH: 33
    Married: 5/30/2013
    DSS #1: 5/25/2007
    DSS #2: 1/22/2011
    DS #3: 7/8/2012
    BFP: 3/14/2016 ~ MC: 3/19/2016
    DS #4: 4/21/17
  • izza2izza2 member
    @KirstinH88 - Thank you! I agree with keeping it simple. Have a few prompts, and then just open it up for anyone to share anything else they want to, without having it so formal.

    Me: 30 | DH: 34 | DSS: 14 | DS: 4
    PG #2, EDD 10/12/2023

  • izza2izza2 member
    BGs decided to unpin the intro thread, so we don't need to worry about that.

    I'm off this weekend, and aside from housework and basking in any sun we have, I have no plans, so I may start working on re-writing the Newbie post so we can get that updated and replace the current one.

    Me: 30 | DH: 34 | DSS: 14 | DS: 4
    PG #2, EDD 10/12/2023

  • @izza2 Thank you so much, dear! Enjoy your weekend. 
    Formerly ahrains
    Me: 42 | DH: 45
    TTC since Dec. 2014
    BFP #1 Oct. 2015 | MC Nov. 2015
    Sept. 2016: FSH, AMH, E2, TSH, etc. all normal. | Oct. 2016: HSG all clear! | Nov. 2016: Hysteroscopy & H's SA both great results
    Dec. 2016 - Follistim + TI
    BFP #2 12/25/16 | Natural MC 2/13/17 | False BFP leads to D&C 4/20/17 | Emergency D&C + hysteroscopy 5/16/17
    <3 The road probably ends here <3 


  • @izza2 Let me know if you need any help! I, too, have very few plans this weekend and I'd be happy to help out!

    Me: 32 years old
    DH: 33 years old
    Married in May 16, 2015
         TTC #1 (on and off) since September 2015
    DS1 Due 6.7.2021
  • izza2izza2 member
    @Maggie1202 - I will, thank you!

    Me: 30 | DH: 34 | DSS: 14 | DS: 4
    PG #2, EDD 10/12/2023

  • izza2izza2 member
    edited July 2016
    So, question - a lot of the newbie guide is specific information, and I've re-written most of it, kept parts, and omitted others.

    Do we want to have it as one big wall of text, like it currently is - one OP for all of the information - or do we want the OP to be the general opening/basics, and then separate other information by their topic, in to replies after the OP?

    Like...
    OP: general welcome, guideline links, How-To Guides, abbreviations
    Reply 1: TW info, BFP info
    Reply 2: Tools for TTC, TWW/WTO threads

    Me: 30 | DH: 34 | DSS: 14 | DS: 4
    PG #2, EDD 10/12/2023

  • izza2izza2 member
    I think if we separate it into comments, then the newbies may not actually read down into the comments for all that other good information. I would keep it in the original post, but clearly label every section with a Bold header.
    That's what I was thinking. Thank you!

    Me: 30 | DH: 34 | DSS: 14 | DS: 4
    PG #2, EDD 10/12/2023

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"