ETA: not looking for a chart stalk here. Wanting anecdotal information from people who have used both programs....
This is only my second month charting (and the first month was a freakishly long cycle--39, I'm never past 29). I used FF last month and both FF and ovasoft this month.
Do you all have thoughts about which software seems more accurate for you? AND do you generally agree with FF as it changes your cross hairs? FF originally said CD 13, then 14, now 16--I'm not sure I agree with the latest interpretation, since I had a mix of creamy and EW on 14 & 15.
Including my chart here if anyone wants to give input, but I'm mainly wondering over the long term, which do you find more reliable?
DD1 (2008) DD2 (2010), #3 (DH's first bio kid) on the way in January 2017!
Almost always mobile bumping--forgive my typos.

Re: FF/ovasoft & changing CH
I would read the newbie guide pinned at the top of the board, lurk, and participate more.
I feel like you're missing the part where I said--"but I'm mainly wondering over the long term, which do you find more reliable?"
if people want to give chart stalking info, that's great. If not, I care more about the answer to my general question. And I realize the newbie posts have info about preferred charting apps etc, but I'm wanting some more annecdotal info (hence the post) not a generalization.
Almost always mobile bumping--forgive my typos.
See you over there.
I am sure plenty of people have feedback on this!
Me:31 H:31
DX: MFI - 1% Morph
12/16 -IVF #1 - Antagonist Protocol w/ Lupron trigger
ER - 11 retrieved- 9 mature - 7 fertilized - 3 sent for PGS on day 5 - No normals (1 XXX Embryo - may use in future)
3/17 - IVF #2 - Antagonist Protocol w/ HCG trigger
ER- 13 retrieved - 11 mature - 8 fertilized - 2 sent for PGS on day 5 -2 Normal
FET #1 - 5/16/17 - BFP! - Beta #1 5/25 - 156 - Beta #2 5/30 - 2562 - Beta #3 6/1 - 5191!
10/2/10
Me:29 H: 31
TTC#1: Aug 2015
https://www.fertilityfriend.com/home/5e3072
Almost always mobile bumping--forgive my typos.
TTC#1: October 2015
dx: PCOS & MFI
IUI #1 w/Femara + Ovidrel June 2016 ~ BFP
July 2016: Blighted Ovum
IUI #2 w/Femara + Ovidrel September 2016 ~BFN
IUI #3 w/Femara + Ovidrel October 2016 ~BFN
IUI #4 w/Femara + Ovidrel November 2016 ~BFN
IVF with ICSI January 2017 ~BFN
FET February 2017 ~BFN
IVF with ICSI March 2017 ~BFP--Twins Due 12/8/17
Team Blue X 2!
We decided that this is a thing now right?
10/2/10
Me:29 H: 31
TTC#1: Aug 2015
https://www.fertilityfriend.com/home/5e3072
Edited to remove erroneous comma
And you say you arent looking for a chart stalk but then you post your chart again if any one wants input?
I saw you made an intro in early April, so you have been around a few weeks, but I haven't seen much from you in the way of support... And now you are creating and AW post to try to get people to respond to your chart when you have already done so in the TWW. this doesn't come off all that well.
... To answer your question, we use FF mostly.
Edited to fix some typos
I was going to say something.....but @furbabymom2007 is on a roll today!
*eta spelling
Me:31 H:31
DX: MFI - 1% Morph
12/16 -IVF #1 - Antagonist Protocol w/ Lupron trigger
ER - 11 retrieved- 9 mature - 7 fertilized - 3 sent for PGS on day 5 - No normals (1 XXX Embryo - may use in future)
3/17 - IVF #2 - Antagonist Protocol w/ HCG trigger
ER- 13 retrieved - 11 mature - 8 fertilized - 2 sent for PGS on day 5 -2 Normal
FET #1 - 5/16/17 - BFP! - Beta #1 5/25 - 156 - Beta #2 5/30 - 2562 - Beta #3 6/1 - 5191!
Just because the Newbie posts (that were made a long time ago) say we generally prefer FF, doesn't mean that it's the constant and no one else ever uses something else or doesn't prefer something else. Asking in WTO and TWW is great, but you're only getting half of the community (if that), and a question like this can be just as good of a conversation as a GTKY thread.
@zdmd_14: In the future, if you're looking for a CS; go to TWW/WTO. If you're not, we don't need to see your charts to know what you're talking about.
As for the base question of whether we prefer FF or Kindara; I personally prefer FF. I've tried Kindara and used it for two cycles, and it was more-so the interface that I did not like. I didn't use it while actively TTC, but rather after we started TTA as a comparison since I'd seen others mention that they prefer it -- but I was already so used to FF that I've stuck with that.
I've heard others say they're not fond of the data entry format for FF or how "user-friendly" it may not be to them; but I've never had problems with that, and personally I thought Kindara was less "user-friendly" than FF - whether on mobile or on my laptop.
As for CH - I had put a previous cycle's information in to Kindara to compare it to FF and see what it had said, and it put my O-date two days (I believe) after FF said I had ovulated. Which would have put my LP at 11 days for that particular cycle. So - in that respect, I didn't like Kindara for accurately tracking ovulation. FF tends to move CH on occasion depending on what you're putting in - but most of the time it's pretty accurate, if not spot on.
Me: 30 | DH: 34 | DSS: 14 | DS: 4
PG #2, EDD 10/12/2023
for me today it is
Me:31 H:31
DX: MFI - 1% Morph
12/16 -IVF #1 - Antagonist Protocol w/ Lupron trigger
ER - 11 retrieved- 9 mature - 7 fertilized - 3 sent for PGS on day 5 - No normals (1 XXX Embryo - may use in future)
3/17 - IVF #2 - Antagonist Protocol w/ HCG trigger
ER- 13 retrieved - 11 mature - 8 fertilized - 2 sent for PGS on day 5 -2 Normal
FET #1 - 5/16/17 - BFP! - Beta #1 5/25 - 156 - Beta #2 5/30 - 2562 - Beta #3 6/1 - 5191!
Me: 37
DH: 36
Married: 08-25-07
DS: 11-20-09
Name change alert: Formerly Lisswastaken
Me: 30 | DH: 34 | DSS: 14 | DS: 4
PG #2, EDD 10/12/2023
TEAM: PINK!!
Me:31 H:31
DX: MFI - 1% Morph
12/16 -IVF #1 - Antagonist Protocol w/ Lupron trigger
ER - 11 retrieved- 9 mature - 7 fertilized - 3 sent for PGS on day 5 - No normals (1 XXX Embryo - may use in future)
3/17 - IVF #2 - Antagonist Protocol w/ HCG trigger
ER- 13 retrieved - 11 mature - 8 fertilized - 2 sent for PGS on day 5 -2 Normal
FET #1 - 5/16/17 - BFP! - Beta #1 5/25 - 156 - Beta #2 5/30 - 2562 - Beta #3 6/1 - 5191!
Almost always mobile bumping--forgive my typos.
Me: 32 DH: 31
TTC #1: January 2008
Surprise BFP: November 2009
CP: September 2016
And for the record - I didn't say anyone was rude. I'm not sure where that came from. But, okay.
Me: 30 | DH: 34 | DSS: 14 | DS: 4
PG #2, EDD 10/12/2023
Me: 37
DH: 36
Married: 08-25-07
DS: 11-20-09
Name change alert: Formerly Lisswastaken
Me:31 H:31
DX: MFI - 1% Morph
12/16 -IVF #1 - Antagonist Protocol w/ Lupron trigger
ER - 11 retrieved- 9 mature - 7 fertilized - 3 sent for PGS on day 5 - No normals (1 XXX Embryo - may use in future)
3/17 - IVF #2 - Antagonist Protocol w/ HCG trigger
ER- 13 retrieved - 11 mature - 8 fertilized - 2 sent for PGS on day 5 -2 Normal
FET #1 - 5/16/17 - BFP! - Beta #1 5/25 - 156 - Beta #2 5/30 - 2562 - Beta #3 6/1 - 5191!
As far as Glow - in case anyone was wondering - it really sucked and I would not recommend it - it was not reliable.
ETA: I just remembered that when I used Glow for 3 months or whatever it was I would put in that I would spot for 2-3 days before my period started and it was like "ALERT! YOU PROBABLY HAVE PCOS" Um. What the fuck.
ETA: If Ovasoft is Ovia then I'd say I definitely prefer FF. I charted with Ovia and FF for about.... 6 months? Give or take a month or so. Ovia doesn't seem to have any idea what to do with temp data. It mostly just ignores them. Sometimes Ovia will give me a message that makes me think it may consider temps somewhat like "if your temps stay elevated in the luteal phase it could be a sign you've conceived. So watch for that!" Although usually when I get that message I cannot figure out what about my temps would have prompted that message. And Ovia has never shifted my O date based on temps. Ovia only seems to move O dates based on OPKs/Fertility monitor results. It will shift a FW forward from the original projected FW based off CM sometimes, but otherwise the FW only moves because of an OPK. Ovia nearly never gets my O date correct and when it does it feels more like an accident than an intelligent use of the information I input.
FF, on the other hand, seems to consider pretty much all the information I give it. And what it does with the information makes sense. I trust FF to consider all my fertility signs and come up with the most likely O date for me. I won't say that there have never been times where I question what FF is doing. But most of the time I'm confident with what FF sets as my O date.
What I do like about other programs, such as Ovia, is they make it really easy to track nutrition, exercise and weight. FF doesn't seem to have a way to input weight on the mobile app, or if it does I haven't found it yet. It certainly isn't as easy as just entering it into Ovia. So for the ladies who aren't temping and are mostly just looking for a calendar app with a couple of bells and whistles Ovia may be a good solution. It doesn't matter if Ovia doesn't use temps appropriately if you aren't temping. And then you can easily track nutrition, vitamins, weight and exercise. However, I can see that you are temping so I'd definitely recommend FF.
TTC#1: January 2015- September 2016
Infertility, Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
Rainbow baby born June 6, 2017 ❤️
Baby #2 due June 12, 2018
Also, I completely agree with @izza2 on this. I've been hardcore lurking this board since October, and this feels like such a frivolous thing to waste that beat-down/redirect-straight-to-noobie-thread energy everyone has stored up. Sure, CS goes in the TWW, but program preferences is a legitimate question for the reasons @izza2 pointed out.
Me: 25 | DH: 25
DD: Aug. 15
10/2/10
Me:29 H: 31
TTC#1: Aug 2015
https://www.fertilityfriend.com/home/5e3072
...poor marketing
ovasoft is by the TCOYF people from what I can tell.
Almost always mobile bumping--forgive my typos.
I don't see the necessity of creating a AW thread when you can participate in one of the daily threads or use the search function. If she had truly lurked any of the boards, she would have noticed how many of us use FF. It's not too difficult to read that or the newbie guide.
^^ this
and i basically turned it into a shameless CS there after getting fussed at and then the bump ate my attempt at c&p this into the 2WW format. :shrug:
Almost always mobile bumping--forgive my typos.
I've never used ovusoft so I can't really comment on that one. But I stand by my opinion that FF is amazing and I'd absolutely recommend it to anyone who is charting.
As to the CS: I'm not sure I'd agree with O on CD13. I'm not sure I'd agree with O on CD16. It's just really hard to tell because I can't tell from that screenshot if you're entering CM/OPK/cervical position and texture etc. Really to pick a day there I'd kinda need to know all that and I'm either bad at reading the chart you posted or you didn't include that information. If I had to just take a guess based on temps alone so I'd that I tend to favor CD14 or 15 for O. But I wouldn't completely rule out the possibility of 13 or 16.
TTC#1: January 2015- September 2016
Infertility, Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
Rainbow baby born June 6, 2017 ❤️
Baby #2 due June 12, 2018
The whole point of the forum isn't just for dailies, it's for people to engage the community as a whole and if they want to ask about two different tracking programs and not just target it toward one half, then so be it. Why is it such a bad thing that people want to engage the community as a whole versus posting in the dailies? Obviously for CSs, dailies. Obviously drive-byes are ridiculous. But something like this? When did TTGP honestly turn in to "everything must be on a daily thread or you'll get flamed"?
Ranting there, but really. Come on. Not every single thing belongs in the WTO or TWW threads. Hell, if I want to ask a question like this I have a very limited audience in the Benched/TTA thread - so do I leave it at the 10-ish people who are regularly contributing there because popping in to the WTO/TWW threads that I haven't done more than lurk and love-tit on in the past 5 months of TTA is a little ridiculous IMO; or do I get flamed for asking it to the entire community as a whole?
It's not being an AW if you're asking for the community's opinion on two different tracking programs. That's a bit far-fetched. And as I said before - just because the majority of the community uses FF doesn't mean everyone does, and it shouldn't be a huge deal that someone wants to know if anyone has experience with another program.
And FWIW, if we're going to tell people to use the search function, make sure there are actually threads for them to refer to. Ovasoft/Ova Graph/whatever has literally only been mentioned on this thread, from my search that I just did. How exactly do you refer to another thread and search for it if no results come up?
Me: 30 | DH: 34 | DSS: 14 | DS: 4
PG #2, EDD 10/12/2023
Me: 32 DH: 31
TTC #1: January 2008
Surprise BFP: November 2009
CP: September 2016
________________________________________________________
Started TTC #1 November 2015
BFP 6/10/2016 - EDD 2/22/2017
I won't participate anymore since we are turning on people who have been contributing and participating over someone that no one in here knows.
ETA: I won't be back to TTGP if I'm going to get flamed for...what exactly? I'm not even sure what I freaking did wrong.
Me: 32 DH: 31
TTC #1: January 2008
Surprise BFP: November 2009
CP: September 2016
TTC#1: January 2015- September 2016
Infertility, Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
Rainbow baby born June 6, 2017 ❤️
Baby #2 due June 12, 2018