ETA: not looking for a chart stalk here. Wanting anecdotal information from people who have used both programs....
This is only my second month charting (and the first month was a freakishly long cycle--39, I'm never past 29). I used FF last month and both FF and ovasoft this month.
Do you all have thoughts about which software seems more accurate for you? AND do you generally agree with FF as it changes your cross hairs? FF originally said CD 13, then 14, now 16--I'm not sure I agree with the latest interpretation, since I had a mix of creamy and EW on 14 & 15.
Including my chart here if anyone wants to give input, but I'm mainly wondering over the long term, which do you find more reliable?
DD1 (2008) DD2 (2010), #3 (DH's first bio kid) on the way in January 2017!
Almost always mobile bumping--forgive my typos.