Community› The Bump Month Clubs› August 2013 Moms
August 2013 Moms
New Discussion

FFFC

12467…13

Re: FFFC

  • Loading the player...
  • CaliforniaDream87CaliforniaDream87 member
    orlaithsheanon16 said:

    CaliforniaDream87 said:

    @orlaithsheanon16 did I say YOUR baby was barefoot? Didn't think so.

    If you read my response to @roostermemphis you would see where I said they are a very necessary accessory. If you don't want your baby in shoes....whatever. Mine will always be in shoes.

    Oh ok. Good for you. You are totally entitled to do what you want with your baby. I would prefer my baby's feet to develop properly than have him decked out in the latest accessory. That's just me.
    Oh, well aren't you "mommy of the year" lol. My LO will stay "decked out in the latest accessory" and his feet will develop just fine, thanks though.

    FWIW, @washingtonqueen and @roostermemphis I appreciate you two agreeing to disagree on this topic. To each their own right? @orlaithsheanon16 to imply that those of us who choose to put shoes on our baby's and that their feet will somehow not develop properly...*rolls eyes*.
        DS born 8-16-2013
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    image
    Report Reply
  • Soleil3Soleil3 member
    My kids are barefoot alllll the time. Never in public, then they either rock a pair of fuzzy non-restrictive-because-heaven-forbid-something-be-close-to-their-feet boots or crocs. Oh yeah, red carpet here we come!
    image image

    Report Reply
  • CaliforniaDream87CaliforniaDream87 member
    edited December 2013
    Soleil3 said:


    RoosterMemphis said:

    I meant barefoot as in soft soled shoes. But by 3yo though, I'll have her in heels. Never too early to be a lady! ;)

    image
    Why wait until 3? Here they have some for 0-6months!







    Shit...why not? @roostermemphis :)

        DS born 8-16-2013
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    image
    Report Reply
  • Leosmom13Leosmom13 member
    CaliforniaDream87 said:

    orlaithsheanon16 said:

    CaliforniaDream87 said:

    @orlaithsheanon16 did I say YOUR baby was barefoot? Didn't think so.

    If you read my response to @roostermemphis you would see where I said they are a very necessary accessory. If you don't want your baby in shoes....whatever. Mine will always be in shoes.

    Oh ok. Good for you. You are totally entitled to do what you want with your baby. I would prefer my baby's feet to develop properly than have him decked out in the latest accessory. That's just me.
    Oh, well aren't you "mommy of the year" lol. My LO will stay "decked out in the latest accessory" and his feet will develop just fine, thanks though.

    FWIW, @washingtonqueen and @roostermemphis I appreciate you two agreeing to disagree on this topic. To each their own right? @orlaithsheanon16 to imply that those of us who choose to put shoes on our baby's and that their feet will somehow not develop properly...*rolls eyes*.
    I'm doing what I think is right and you're doing what you think is right for your LO. I just feel like I need to defend where I am coming from given that you "judge" moms who don't put shoes on their LO's. Your the one who started with the judgemental attitude.
    Also I would love to be mom of the year but sadly I fell short on lots of things, maybe next year..... ;)
    imageimage
    Leo John, Born August 12th 2013


    Report Reply
  • Soleil3Soleil3 member
    Not to be all blah blah about it, but most shoes on baby feet can hinder proper development. Robeez and the like are ok because they are basically socks, but anything with a real sole isn't ideal.

    image image

    Report Reply
  • CaliforniaDream87CaliforniaDream87 member
    Soleil3 said:

    Not to be all blah blah about it, but most shoes on baby feet can hinder proper development. Robeez and the like are ok because they are basically socks, but anything with a real sole isn't ideal.


    Meh, he wears them when we go out and when he's at home with the nanny/or us he has on socks. I'm fine with my decision.
        DS born 8-16-2013
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    image
    Report Reply
  • girlmama83girlmama83 member
    Soleil3 said:

    Not to be all blah blah about it, but most shoes on baby feet can hinder proper development. Robeez and the like are ok because they are basically socks, but anything with a real sole isn't ideal.


    Oh nothing with a real sole here

    ;;)
    Lilypie Maternity tickers

    <3 Mama to 2 girls - H&I <3
    Report Reply
  • CaliforniaDream87CaliforniaDream87 member
    orlaithsheanon16 said:

    CaliforniaDream87 said:

    orlaithsheanon16 said:

    CaliforniaDream87 said:

    @orlaithsheanon16 did I say YOUR baby was barefoot? Didn't think so.

    If you read my response to @roostermemphis you would see where I said they are a very necessary accessory. If you don't want your baby in shoes....whatever. Mine will always be in shoes.

    Oh ok. Good for you. You are totally entitled to do what you want with your baby. I would prefer my baby's feet to develop properly than have him decked out in the latest accessory. That's just me.
    Oh, well aren't you "mommy of the year" lol. My LO will stay "decked out in the latest accessory" and his feet will develop just fine, thanks though.

    FWIW, @washingtonqueen and @roostermemphis I appreciate you two agreeing to disagree on this topic. To each their own right? @orlaithsheanon16 to imply that those of us who choose to put shoes on our baby's and that their feet will somehow not develop properly...*rolls eyes*.
    I'm doing what I think is right and you're doing what you think is right for your LO. I just feel like I need to defend where I am coming from given that you "judge" moms who don't put shoes on their LO's. Your the one who started with the judgemental attitude.
    Also I would love to be mom of the year but sadly I fell short on lots of things, maybe next year..... ;)

    Oh yea, that implication was really "defending". As previously stated, do you. I don't mind taking flames from those that disagree. It's my FFFC, whatever.
        DS born 8-16-2013
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    image
    Report Reply
  • Leosmom13Leosmom13 member
    CaliforniaDream87 said:

    orlaithsheanon16 said:

    CaliforniaDream87 said:

    orlaithsheanon16 said:

    CaliforniaDream87 said:

    @orlaithsheanon16 did I say YOUR baby was barefoot? Didn't think so.

    If you read my response to @roostermemphis you would see where I said they are a very necessary accessory. If you don't want your baby in shoes....whatever. Mine will always be in shoes.

    Oh ok. Good for you. You are totally entitled to do what you want with your baby. I would prefer my baby's feet to develop properly than have him decked out in the latest accessory. That's just me.
    Oh, well aren't you "mommy of the year" lol. My LO will stay "decked out in the latest accessory" and his feet will develop just fine, thanks though.

    FWIW, @washingtonqueen and @roostermemphis I appreciate you two agreeing to disagree on this topic. To each their own right? @orlaithsheanon16 to imply that those of us who choose to put shoes on our baby's and that their feet will somehow not develop properly...*rolls eyes*.
    I'm doing what I think is right and you're doing what you think is right for your LO. I just feel like I need to defend where I am coming from given that you "judge" moms who don't put shoes on their LO's. Your the one who started with the judgemental attitude.
    Also I would love to be mom of the year but sadly I fell short on lots of things, maybe next year..... ;)

    Oh yea, that implication was really "defending". As previously stated, do you. I don't mind taking flames from those that disagree. It's my FFFC, whatever.
    Fine your right. So my confession is, you judge me for not putting shoes on my baby, and I judge you for putting shoes on your baby.
    imageimage
    Leo John, Born August 12th 2013


    Report Reply
  • CaliforniaDream87CaliforniaDream87 member
    WashingtonQueen said:

    Directly from the AAP -  "Optimum foot development occurs in the barefoot environment."

    Yep, and he's barefoot when were home.
        DS born 8-16-2013
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    image
    Report Reply
  • CaliforniaDream87CaliforniaDream87 member
    RoosterMemphis said:

    Soleil3 said:

    Not to be all blah blah about it, but most shoes on baby feet can hinder proper development. Robeez and the like are ok because they are basically socks, but anything with a real sole isn't ideal.


    With all the research I've done, and I really have because people gave my mom SHIT for it back in the 80s/90s, I'm going to have to agree. I didn't get my first pair if soled shoes till I went to kindergarten. My mom is a whack job, but some of the stuff she did was ok. @californiadream I also totally understand where you're coming from. This is why I'm trying to make my own baby stuff because I'm vain in that regard and I want her to look cute as fuck. :)
    We can't all be as crafty as you @roostermemphis!
        DS born 8-16-2013
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    image
    Report Reply
  • CaliforniaDream87CaliforniaDream87 member
    @soleil3 I'm confused with the whole "our parents did it when we were kids" thing. Where did I say that?
        DS born 8-16-2013
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    image
    Report Reply
  • CaliforniaDream87CaliforniaDream87 member
    orlaithsheanon16 said:

    CaliforniaDream87 said:

    orlaithsheanon16 said:

    CaliforniaDream87 said:

    orlaithsheanon16 said:

    CaliforniaDream87 said:

    @orlaithsheanon16 did I say YOUR baby was barefoot? Didn't think so.

    If you read my response to @roostermemphis you would see where I said they are a very necessary accessory. If you don't want your baby in shoes....whatever. Mine will always be in shoes.

    Oh ok. Good for you. You are totally entitled to do what you want with your baby. I would prefer my baby's feet to develop properly than have him decked out in the latest accessory. That's just me.
    Oh, well aren't you "mommy of the year" lol. My LO will stay "decked out in the latest accessory" and his feet will develop just fine, thanks though.

    FWIW, @washingtonqueen and @roostermemphis I appreciate you two agreeing to disagree on this topic. To each their own right? @orlaithsheanon16 to imply that those of us who choose to put shoes on our baby's and that their feet will somehow not develop properly...*rolls eyes*.
    I'm doing what I think is right and you're doing what you think is right for your LO. I just feel like I need to defend where I am coming from given that you "judge" moms who don't put shoes on their LO's. Your the one who started with the judgemental attitude.
    Also I would love to be mom of the year but sadly I fell short on lots of things, maybe next year..... ;)

    Oh yea, that implication was really "defending". As previously stated, do you. I don't mind taking flames from those that disagree. It's my FFFC, whatever.
    Fine your right. So my confession is, you judge me for not putting shoes on my baby, and I judge you for putting shoes on your baby.

    Difference is...I don't give a fuck...
        DS born 8-16-2013
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    image
    Report Reply
  • WashingtonQueenWashingtonQueen member
    somebodysmama21 said:
    Not to be all blah blah about it, but most shoes on baby feet can hinder proper development. Robeez and the like are ok because they are basically socks, but anything with a real sole isn't ideal.

    Right no one is trying to make anyone feel bad for putting shoes on their kid but it is a proven fact hard sole shoes are bad for development. Like I said before hard soles=bad, soft soles =basically socks.


    Yep.

     "Stiff and compressive footwear may cause deformity, weakness, and loss of mobility."

     

    Now with all this being said, I have a pair of Juicy Couture shoes a friend got for DD that she will be wearing for pictures.

    Report Reply
  • WildRumpusWildRumpus member
    RoosterMemphis said:

    Jill9288 said:

    image

    I thought this was Garth.

    It's Kelly!
    Ezra James 08/22/2013  <3
    Nora Grace Due 12/26/2016  <3

    Two Angel Babies 
    07/03/2012
    08/08/2015

    "If you're still my small babe
    or you're all the way grown,
    my promise to you
    is you're never alone.
    You are my angel, my darling,
    my star...and my love will find you,
    wherever you are."
    Report Reply
  • Soleil3Soleil3 member
    CaliforniaDream87 said:
    @soleil3 I'm confused with the whole "our parents did it when we were kids" thing. Where did I say that?
    madelinegrace said it. 
    image image

    Report Reply
  • RoosterMemphisRoosterMemphis member
    CaliforniaDream87 said:

    @soleil3 I'm confused with the whole "our parents did it when we were kids" thing. Where did I say that?

    I whipped that out. She might be talking about me.

    photo crunchy_zps41233998.gif
    Report Reply
  • CaliforniaDream87CaliforniaDream87 member
    somebodysmama21 said:

    Soleil3 said:

    Not to be all blah blah about it, but most shoes on baby feet can hinder proper development. Robeez and the like are ok because they are basically socks, but anything with a real sole isn't ideal.


    Right no one is trying to make anyone feel bad for putting shoes on their kid but it is a proven fact hard sole shoes are bad for development. Like I said before hard soles=bad, soft soles =basically socks.

    Well that is great information. All of his shoes (except 3) are made with soft soles. :)
        DS born 8-16-2013
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    image
    Report Reply
  • girlmama83girlmama83 member
    somebodysmama21 said:

    Soleil3 said:

    Not to be all blah blah about it, but most shoes on baby feet can hinder proper development. Robeez and the like are ok because they are basically socks, but anything with a real sole isn't ideal.


    Right no one is trying to make anyone feel bad for putting shoes on their kid but it is a proven fact hard sole shoes are bad for development. Like I said before hard soles=bad, soft soles =basically socks.

    Who said they were putting their baby in hard soles?

    Lilypie Maternity tickers

    <3 Mama to 2 girls - H&I <3
    Report Reply
  • CaliforniaDream87CaliforniaDream87 member
    @lindsey61811 exactly. Most baby shoes don't even come in hard soles (very few do).
        DS born 8-16-2013
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    image
    Report Reply
  • Leosmom13Leosmom13 member
    lindsey61811 said:

    orlaithsheanon16 said:

    CaliforniaDream87 said:

    @orlaithsheanon16 did I say YOUR baby was barefoot? Didn't think so.

    If you read my response to @roostermemphis you would see where I said they are a very necessary accessory. If you don't want your baby in shoes....whatever. Mine will always be in shoes.

    Oh ok. Good for you. You are totally entitled to do what you want with your baby. I would prefer my baby's feet to develop properly than have him decked out in the latest accessory. That's just me.
    Every single thing you post irritates me.
    That doesn't really impact my life. We can't all be best friends forever.
    imageimage
    Leo John, Born August 12th 2013


    Report Reply
  • girlmama83girlmama83 member
    Jill9288 said:

    We use the envelope system for budgeting. I miiiiiiiight have dipped into Ezra's envelope today for coffee. I didn't have mine with me and knew DH would have been annoyed if I'd swiped my card for Starbucks when we have coffee at home

    Guilty :-h
    Lilypie Maternity tickers

    <3 Mama to 2 girls - H&I <3
    Report Reply
  • girlmama83girlmama83 member
    orlaithsheanon16 said:

    lindsey61811 said:

    orlaithsheanon16 said:

    CaliforniaDream87 said:

    @orlaithsheanon16 did I say YOUR baby was barefoot? Didn't think so.

    If you read my response to @roostermemphis you would see where I said they are a very necessary accessory. If you don't want your baby in shoes....whatever. Mine will always be in shoes.

    Oh ok. Good for you. You are totally entitled to do what you want with your baby. I would prefer my baby's feet to develop properly than have him decked out in the latest accessory. That's just me.
    Every single thing you post irritates me.
    That doesn't really impact my life. We can't all be best friends forever.
    Shucks, that's the effect I was going for.

    Lilypie Maternity tickers

    <3 Mama to 2 girls - H&I <3
    Report Reply
  • Emeraldeyed315Emeraldeyed315 member
    My friend posted this article on fb: https://zenpsychiatry.com/love-is/

    My fffc is that while I feel empathy for the woman, and am glad she is getting treatment I'm also really annoyed. She was able to expedite treatment/tests because of who she knows. I lost one of my best friends on September to cancer and she had to wait weeks sometimes to find out results. I know this is how the world works- but it really sucks that everyone cant find faster answers when they are in a scary place in their life. 
    BabyFruit Ticker
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

     Daisypath Anniversary tickers

    VOTE on my Name List
    Report Reply
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"