question! I know this has been asked before and some of you long timers are probably going to be rude and tell me to "lurk" but you know what? I wanted to ask for myself and maybe get some new-comer answers! So please, if you're going to be negative, please leave because that is soooo not what this website is used for! So, I'm on my cycle after a very early miscarriage (hoping for the best this time) and had a drink last night and two tonight! I don't plan on drinking anymore till we know seeing I have a short cycle and will probably know sometime next week! My question is how many of you abstain from drinking or actually drink till its pink?! I heard that the first few weeks don't matter since you don't share anything with the baby, yet I still feel this slight regret thinking what if those two drinks tonight will make me miscarry again, or something else not good?!
Re: Drink till its pink?
This is not the best way to start a discussion. Just sayin'.
Personally, I wait until AF.
https://forums.thebump.com/discussion/12564614/
https://forums.thebump.com/discussion/comment/87250376
https://forums.thebump.com/discussion/comment/86586006
TTC #1 --- BFP #1 5/15, loss at 5 weeks --- BFP #2 12/15, loss at 4+3 --- RE testing 3/16 normal, still trying for our rainbow
DS: 9/18/12 - 40w5d // DD: 05/17/16 - 40w
DS: Born 5-17-16
Thank you @letyourheartbeyourguide for providing just how much this topic is discussed.
The poll was actually made maybe two weeks ago that @lalala2004 was describing so it's not like this was SUCH a long time ago.
And actually the "long timers" LOVE this topic because to TTC for months on end, going through losses and the cray cray of everything LOTS OF WINE IS USUALLY NEEDED TO DEAL.
No need to poke a potentially drunk bumping bear so to speak with your presumptions.
And in answer to your question
give me all the wine.
TTC #1 --- BFP #1 5/15, loss at 5 weeks --- BFP #2 12/15, loss at 4+3 --- RE testing 3/16 normal, still trying for our rainbow
TTC #1 --- BFP #1 5/15, loss at 5 weeks --- BFP #2 12/15, loss at 4+3 --- RE testing 3/16 normal, still trying for our rainbow
TTC #1 --- BFP #1 5/15, loss at 5 weeks --- BFP #2 12/15, loss at 4+3 --- RE testing 3/16 normal, still trying for our rainbow
So what you are saying is that you don't have to follow established rules or community standards? That you are too much of a special sneauxflake to use the search feature? That is what you are communicating.
To answer your question: I'm 7DPO & I am getting wine drunk currently. Until I test positive give me all the booze.
LFAF Summer 2016 Awards:
If the answer is to use the regulars on this board as your personal Google, then maybe you can understand why the repeats of questions, particularly ones that are against the rules, would grow tiresome.
If you had asked your question without the clear attitude of your assumptions, you probably wouldn't have gotten a negative response. Now we'll always remember you as a person who thinks we are rude. Why would you want that?
*post it*
LFAF Summer 2016 Awards:
TTC #1 --- BFP #1 5/15, loss at 5 weeks --- BFP #2 12/15, loss at 4+3 --- RE testing 3/16 normal, still trying for our rainbow
The only negative response you are getting is because of your negative assumptions.
It must be easy of you to assume what would have happened if you hadn't prefaced your post with how negative you expected it to go. You can bet your money all day long, but it proves nothing, other than the fact that you have a negative opinion of the board, which still begs the question of why you chose to post in the first place if that was your impression.
I truly fail to understand....
TTC #1 --- BFP #1 5/15, loss at 5 weeks --- BFP #2 12/15, loss at 4+3 --- RE testing 3/16 normal, still trying for our rainbow
IUI August 2016 : Cancelled due to polyp
September 2016: Polyp removal/hysteroscopy
October 2016: IUI #1- BFN
November 2016: IUI #2- BFN
December 2016: IUI #3 - BFN
January/February 2017 - IVF + ICSI + PGD
March 2017 - FET
You know the phrase of "you know what you get when you ASSume"? Pretty sure just the first part in that phrase applies in this case though.
LFAF Summer 2016 Awards:
LFAF Summer 2016 Awards:
TTC #1 --- BFP #1 5/15, loss at 5 weeks --- BFP #2 12/15, loss at 4+3 --- RE testing 3/16 normal, still trying for our rainbow
See how easy it is to get the TOUs into this argument?
This whole post is one gigantic FAIL
That is like punching someone in the face and calling them violent when they retaliate.
I am starting to doubt that you even wanted to have your question answered as much as you want to yell at people on the Internet.
You have given no logical reason for why you chose to post based on statements you yourself have made.
This is really quite perplexing.
*insert Spock gif I am too lazy to put in myself*
Don't call me sweetie either. Totally condescending reply. I stand by my word, if you don't like it here, leave. Don't keep insulting regular members here. If you want to learn more, use the search function.
Married Sept '13
TTC Dec '13
BFP 10/8/2014 MMC 11/20/2014 D&C 11/26/14
BFP 9/20/2015 MMC 10/7/2015 D&C 10/15/15