Hi ladies! Just wondering if any other FTMs have noticed the "lightening" yet...I'm 33 weeks and 2 days now, but I'm fairly certain she dropped last Friday. Suddenly I could breath, I can eat without feeling full, and ALL the pressure is on my bladder and pelvic area. I know there is no exact science, but What to Expect says that the baby usually drops 2-4 weeks before labor. Any STMs find this to be the case? Just wondering how much time I have left so that I can make arrangements for coverage at work if she doesn't stay in until my due date!
Re: Baby has dropped!
DS: Born 5-17-16
According to my doctor and the midwife leading my birthing class, 37 weeks is full term. They recently broke up the period between 37 and 41 weeks into different categories, with 37-39 weeks being called "early term" because of the recognition that, for some women, 37 weeks still isn't enough time for full development. However, it also recognizes that everyone is different. The midwife says that every woman has a different "incubator" and for many women, 37 weeks is how long their body is designed to be pregnant. 40 isn't a magic number. There is plenty of room for error given there is no exact science to calculating due dates..if there were, more than just 10% of women would deliver on their set due date.
My baby is perfectly healthy according to my doctor and could come at 36 weeks and she would not be concerned. Lots of snotty responses to a simple post that I thought was expressing my excitement. So sorry to offend anyone with my eagerness about finally getting to meet my baby in the near future in a safe way.
I'm glad that your baby is healthy, but that does not mean that your baby being born at 36 weeks would be the best situation. Since dating ultrasounds are becoming much more standard, it allows doctors and patients to more accurately determine a due date.
DD was born at 37 weeks due to me having pre-eclampsia. It was safer for both of us for her to be born early than for her to stay in. And yes, she was born early. They classified her as 'late pre-term', NOT 'early term'. If she had been born 1 day before before 37 weeks my doctor would have requested that a NICU team be in the room when she was born. I was never able to breastfeed because she wouldn't latch. They decided that part of the reason for that is that she was late pre-term. Her not being full-term hindered her ability to latch and I had to exclusively pump. So trust me when I say, I would've given anything to be pregnant for 3 more weeks if it meant I was able to breastfeed my child. It's so selfish to want your baby to come early just so you don't have to be pregnant anymore. Yes, pregnancy is uncomfortable, but why would you not want your child to have the BEST chance to thrive and do well?
Sorry, but it is irresponsible to spread this information for everyone to read when it is not accurate.
I love how the people who are upset about my excitement are implying that I'm a bad person in some way because I don't see it as an absolute necessity to go to 40, 41, or 42 weeks in order for a baby to be healthy. Also, more importantly, I do not control when she's ready--she and my body do. You are acting as if I'm saying, wow, I can't wait to ask my doctor to induce me at 37 weeks so I can be done with this. Never did I imply I WANT a premature baby. But I won't apologize for being excited that my body is showing signals that she may come sooner rather than later. And, if she does, I have the full confidence that my doctor knows exactly what to do (i.e., allow her to be born or intervene to stop labor if there are concerns that it's too soon).
For those debating the terminology (old, new, whatever, medical information is constantly changing and probably will again--just like they go back and forth about whether eggs are good for you or terrible for you) about what's full-term, I'll let my doctor know that she is wrong and is spreading misinformation. Just FYI, she explained to me that the rationale for changing the distinction into early, full, or late term was to deter any medically unnecessary inductions that some doctors and women were opting to do. NOT because they discovered that there is a set standard for every single woman and every single baby about what week is required for a fully matured baby. I am quite surprised that the same people who say to other posters "every woman and every pregnancy is different" will say in the same breath that 40 weeks is best for everyone.
Also, don't put words in my mouth. I never said "I don't want to go full term". I said--"I was hoping to keep her in full term" and because there was a recent change in medical terminology you didn't agree with my 37 week specifier and implied I meant "I want to have a premature baby so I can be more comfortable." Not at all what I said.
Bottom line--I'm not in control of when I go into labor. I never said I'm hoping for a premature birth and am certainly not planning on asking to be induced so I can be "done with being pregnant". I love being pregnant, but after almost 8 months of doing that, I'm excited about the next step and I don't think that makes me a terrible person.
it sounds like you WANT your baby to be born early, so people were just trying to understand why anyone would want their baby to be born early.. I dont understand how people wondering why you would want your baby born early is "rude" or "snotty"? Having a baby born before they are ready is a very serious thing that no one on this board takes lightly, so please have respect and understanding for that. It's not a joke to the women on this board- especially to those who have had premature babies
Just as a side note, it's easy to get caught up in arguments on here because we all have an opinion. And that's ok - we're all human. And babies are a touchy subject. Stop replying to the thread if you're getting annoyed with people's responses. I agree this should be a place of support but like so many people have said on here before, when we choose to voice our opinion in an open forum unfortunately you cannot control the opinions of others and they have the right to comment as they choose.
Nope.
Or perhaps the response I was looking for, @JessiecaB0627 is "hey, baby dropping early doesn't necessarily mean you'll go into labor" or "maybe have coverage for work just to be sure, but it isn't a sure thing that you'll go into labor during any set time frame". I wasn't asking to start a poll on how many weeks I had left OR ask your opinion on the health of my baby--I simply asked whether it would be prudent to plan with my boss or if I should continue on with working as usual.
I don't think I'll be opening this one again.
I get what you mean, OP, but you still have a ways to go. Some of the PPs aren't wrong though, according to March of Dimes, a full term baby is 39 weeks, 0 days to 40 weeks, 6 days. But that is really a generalization. Your doctor would know your progress best of course!
You're in the home stretch and you should have faith that your doctor will be able to tackle any obstacles that could come up in late pregnancy. At this point though, the longer your baby can stay in, the better it is for her.
OP I doubt anyone intended to say that you would want anything but what's best for your baby! There is a lot of different information out there and I personally find it intimidating to try and keep up w/it all, like I'm supposed to be an expert about pregnancy now that I'm pregnant!! It can be overwhelming!
Try to look at it like this: someone in your community heard something they thought might put you and baby at risk and said something because they were worried about you
Been married since 2009.
Unicornuate Uterus (yes I menstruate glitter)
Several MCs
DD born 2013 (our miracle "you can't have babies" baby!)
Been married since 2009.
Unicornuate Uterus (yes I menstruate glitter)
Several MCs
DD born 2013 (our miracle "you can't have babies" baby!)
I have to deliver via c-section at 36 or 37 weeks (which for me is next week or the week following) because I have a high risk for uterine rupture. My OB has acted like 36 to 37 is normal, even extremely safe, and it was actually a former NICU employee here on The Bump that helped me ask questions I didn't know to ask. After speaking with L&D at my hospital, I realized there are significant differences in how LO will be treated based on even 1 week. 36 weeks meant increased and more frequent tests, higher likelihood of breathing issues, jaundice, issues regarding glucose regulation, and difficulty latching. But was this ever told to me? No.
Do I think my OB purposely tried to deceive me? No, but I also think that not giving me a full picture was causing me to make less informed decisions. At this point, I have no signs of pre labor and am insistent that as long as I am medically stable, I will fight to keep him in as long as possible, even if that's only to 37 weeks 1 day.
I want to meet my son, and even right now when I'm covered in PUPPS and utterly miserable, I will fight for everyday that he is able to stay inside. The women on this board can be incredibly helpful, especially to FTM's, because their experiences enable us to better advocate for ourselves. I know I'm incredibly grateful for one post and one Bumpie who helped me to fight for my son and hopefully give him the best start that I can.
Hugs and good luck.
I also went to a few La Leche League meetings, but I'm not certain I'm quite hardcore enough for them... The hospital lactation specialist made me a bit more comfortable.