December 2013 Moms

FFFC!

135

Re: FFFC!

  • I
    My FFFC is that i think everyone should be able to have the joy of a child in their lives regardless of their job situation. I dont think just because you work fastfood or have a dead end job you shouldnt be able to have a child/baby.

    Ya i decided to wait until i was stable and have a child later in life... But what is gonna  make me a better mom then someone who works at taco bell? 
    My concern is if you can't feed your child and provide housing which are basic needs. You don't need to be rich to have kids but to have a kid you can't afford to feed is wrong.
    Exactly!!
    To follow up, what would you propose we do in regard to preventing poor people from having children? Force sterilizations? BC doesn't work all of the time and you can't regulate someone keeping up with it if they don't want to. You'd have to sterilize them. Doesn't that violate a lot of their human rights? Do poor people have human rights to you? Who's paying for the sterilizations? And, again, how do we determine who'd qualified to have children and who's not? It may be that we as a country decide one day that we're too overpopulated, so only the rich can have children, and since we've already upheld the precedent, it'd be NBD. Then you and I wouldn't be having children either. And before you say that's crazy, look at China.

    From a practical standpoint, that opinion just isn't defensible. It'd be great if people who couldn't provide the basic necessities for their children would avoid pregnancy, but you can't force that one them in any way. And if you think we should, then China's still over there...
    I never said sterilize nor would I. I just think it is highly irresponsible to have a baby you can't feed.
    You said it was wrong, not irresponsible. I don't think anyone is going to argue with "irresponsible," but it being wrong? Define wrong. Did you mean they shouldn't if they made good choices, or did you mean they shouldn't be able to? You never said sterilize, but how would you enforce it? There's only one way. So, if you wouldn't do that, then you didn't really think about the first statement you made before you made it.

     

     

     
  • Loading the player...
  • I farted the other day while my fiance was in the other room and then blamed it on the cat.  He totally bought it.
     BabyFetus Ticker
    Baby GIRL due 12/26
  • Ktrue85 said:
    Okay, here's another confession.

    I DVR the following shows:

    19 Kids and Counting
    Sister Wives
    Amish Mafia
    Breaking Amish: LA
    Extreme Couponing
    My Strange Addiction
    The Little Couple

    So, basically, I have an addiction to bad TLC realty shows.

    ETA: Sister Wives
    I have a love/hate relationship with sister wives. I watch the show just to bitch about it the whole time. 

    My FFFC: I've known/been with my husband for 11 years and married for 2 and 1/2. He "accidentally farted in front of me yesterday when we were outside with the dog (I guess he thought it would be quiet) and we both about died of laughter. I have never farted in front of him. 
    I think there are a few women on here that never have either.  I think that's crazy! To each his own, but I can't imagine that! When I gave birth to DS i pooped on the table a little lol so i've definitely farted in front of him.
    Actually, we're really gross and try to "out stink" one another.  He's always scared when I'm pregnant since I always win then.  I know, we're disgusting and immature. 
    Haha I told him I might poop on the table when I deliver and he said he'd do his best to pretend he doesn't notice. Not farting in front of him is definitely getting difficult lately. I just can't bring myself to do it!
    Well hopefully you don't poop on the table! I would say most women do but maybe you'll be one of the lucky ones! I know with DS, they removed it right away.  I actually asked DH about an hour after I delivered....I whispered, "Uh...so did I..poop?" He laughed and said only a little bit but they quickly removed the chux and replaced it with a new one.

    View Full Size Image 
    View Full Size Image View Full Size Image  View Full Size Image

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

  • Well hopefully you don't poop on the table! I would say most women do but maybe you'll be one of the lucky ones! I know with DS, they removed it right away.  I actually asked DH about an hour after I delivered....I whispered, "Uh...so did I..poop?" He laughed and said only a little bit but they quickly removed the chux and replaced it with a new one.
    I will say that I've never pooped on the table. Not to say it couldn't happen to me, but I'm pretty sure I've had poops harder to pass than both of my DSs. If you're as constipated as I am, then no matter how much you push that baby out, you're prolly still not going to poop!

    No wonder people tell me I have a stick up my ass.

     

     

     


  • My confession: I GPS track my DH! I know it sounds awful but let me explain! Well it started like 2 years ago when he started working out of town. A friend of mine said she did it with her H and to just call AT&T and they would explain. I called and they told me as long as we both have iPhones, which we did, to just install an app call "Find iphone" and you simply log in and you can see exactly where the phone is. The lady from AT&T even said she does it with her H. So yea that's why I do it. And I rarely use it! I only use it to see if he's on his way home so I can be ready. It's an awesome feature and he knows I do it.
    I'm just confused...Couldn't you ask DH when he plans to be home?  I feel this is like snooping through his phone, looking to catch him doing something bad....



    Nah... Didn't you read my replies?

    image
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Ktrue85 said:

    Okay, here's another confession.

    I DVR the following shows:

    19 Kids and Counting
    Sister Wives
    Amish Mafia
    Breaking Amish: LA
    Extreme Couponing
    My Strange Addiction
    The Little Couple

    So, basically, I have an addiction to bad TLC realty shows.

    ETA: Sister Wives

    I loveeee Sister Wives, Little Couple and 19 Kids and Counting! Sister Wives = very interesting show, I don't judge other people's lifestyles, I like to learn about others. Little Couple = they are simply amazing and adopting and giving their child an amazing life! 19 Kids = they have the most respectful and responsible children and they have 19! It's incredible!

    image



    My sweet girl Lilijana Jane 12/16/13
    View Full Size Image 
  • @Mamahanna
    Me and my dad never had a relationship. He was never there for me. He would sit at home watching TV when I had a band performance or something for karate. He was givin many opportunities to fix this. I told him many times how I felt. He passed away 10 yrs ago when I was 19. It still hurts I never had a dad that everyone deserves. There is a difference in being a father and a dad. Mine was definitely a father. That's why I will make sure DH is there as much as possible which I know won't be an issue that's why I picked him.

  • Marchmellow2Marchmellow2 member
    edited August 2013





    My confession: I GPS track my DH! I know it sounds awful but let me explain! Well it started like 2 years ago when he started working out of town. A friend of mine said she did it with her H and to just call AT&T and they would explain. I called and they told me as long as we both have iPhones, which we did, to just install an app call "Find iphone" and you simply log in and you can see exactly where the phone is. The lady from AT&T even said she does it with her H. So yea that's why I do it. And I rarely use it! I only use it to see if he's on his way home so I can be ready. It's an awesome feature and he knows I do it.
    I'm just confused...Couldn't you ask DH when he plans to be home?  I feel this is like snooping through his phone, looking to catch him doing something bad....
    Nah... Didn't you read my replies? Some of your replies came after my post...And even then, it doesn't really change my opinion...


    Well you're wrong. If it was to catch him doing something I would have no problem saying so. I'm not fake or making stuff up. I'm straight up, and if I was doing it cause I didn't trust him, I would say so.


    image
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • This is more of a vent than a FFFC but I'm so sick of women complaining about how long they were in labor. One of my cousins had a baby last week and she's still bitching about being in labor for 14 hours. Uh, I'll be happy with 14 hours this time around.

    News flash. Laboring can take awhile and it hurts.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • I think there are a few women on here that never have either.  I think that's crazy! To each his own, but I can't imagine that! When I gave birth to DS i pooped on the table a little lol so i've definitely farted in front of him.
    Actually, we're really gross and try to "out stink" one another.  He's always scared when I'm pregnant since I always win then.  I know, we're disgusting and immature. 
    I try to be like a lady most of the time.  But, seriously, since being pregnant, I have the loudest nastiest farts ever!  Most of the time they don't stink...But, there have been some times lately, DH is even disgusted.  He mocks me, "they don't stink."  I'm like, X(   I'm pregnant, I can't really help it.  And He just laughs and laughs and laughs and says I have no room to talk about him being stinky anymore.  But, it is really only since I've been pregnant......
    Haha, I totally lol'd when I read that...pregnancy definitely makes them worse! I'm a lady for the most part but we totally act like teenagers behind closed doors ;)

    View Full Size Image 
    View Full Size Image View Full Size Image  View Full Size Image

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • I'm not going to argue with anyone on this thread. Nor defend my opinion. So I just want to tell you ladies to have a nice day!! And smile! :)
    That's your prerogative.

    My FFFC is that it's a huge pet peeve of mine that people have opinions that they can't or won't back up with logic. Sure, everyone's entitled to their opinion, but if you respect yourself you'll form an opinion that informed on facts and can be upheld with logic, not just one that sounds good to you.

    Honestly, I really don't care about most of the stuff that gets discussed on this board in principle, but when I see people making judgments, comments or choices that just don't make sense, I feel like I should say something to them, or at least make sure I understand the entirety of their position (hell, I could just be misunderstanding them). And the, "whateva whateva I think what I want," response makes me feel like I've wasted my time. :(

     

     

     
  • MEP923 said:



    I don't know if I can handle two days in a row of the poor people should get jobs and stretch their pittance of EBT to make gourmet healthy meals bullshit. It's really easy to claim you've hit a home run through hard work and gumption when you're born on second base.




    See, these comments make me mad though. It is just as ignorant as any other comment in here. That is like saying anyone who is successful had help growing up. It is possible to become successful in this world when you come from NOTHING through hard work. My husband came from a low income town. His parents didn't give him a penny. Him and his siblings worked for everything they have. When DH was 16 (he is the youngest) his mom left him in the house by himself to be with her third husband. He was financially and in every way independent. He worked 2 jobs, went to school (graduated second in his class) then worked his way through college paid completely by himself (plus his car payments, bills, etc completely on his own). He still has student loans but he works his butt off to get where he is now with the help of nobody. 2 of his siblings did the same thing and 1 didn't go to school but worked his ass off in his trade and now lives very comfortably.

    I understand it is easier for people with help but it's not impossible for people in bad situations. My husband and all of his siblings managed to make something out of themselves without ever receiving one penny from anyone.

    It just makes me mad when people come on here and say my husband is so lazy I am leaving him then come on and say their salaries should be raised for doing nothing. Yes harder work could pay off. You want a full time job or a different job? Look for it! I don't feel bad for the person playing video games all day who plays the woe is me card when there are people like my husband who has worked his butt off. Do we really live in such an entitled country that we can't see that hard work pays off? And to be honest it's people who claim "people who come from bad situations can't go to school" or "Can't make anything of themselves" that further allow the entitlement. Everyone has opportunities. It's what you make of your situation.

     

    End rant. I am exiting this thread to eat a snickers before my head explodes haha.

    Some of the people here cracking on the poor for taking a free ride have previously admitted to coming from families who make six figures. Second base.
    D13 June Siggy Challenge Awkward (Awesome) Bathing Suits
    photo d5230f4f-07cc-4b75-b11c-da060b42a66d.jpg

  • You said it was wrong, not irresponsible. I don't think anyone is going to argue with "irresponsible," but it being wrong? Define wrong. Did you mean they shouldn't if they made good choices, or did you mean they shouldn't be able to? You never said sterilize, but how would you enforce it? There's only one way. So, if you wouldn't do that, then you didn't really think about the first statement you made before you made it.
    Nicholssquared, love, I think you're reading way too much into this. You're taking a conversation about how it's responsible for people to wait to have kids until they can reasonably afford them, and turning it into a conversation about sterilization.
    Hmm...I was just trying to probe further into her position good-naturedly. Sterilization is the logical next step of what she was suggesting. I'm just trying to make sure that's clear, because most people who are of the opinion that it's wrong for poor people to have children make that statement without really understanding the consequences of that opinion.

    Like I said, I think everyone can agree that it's irresponsible. But she didn't say that at first - she said it was wrong. I don't think asking her to further clarify her position is taking it too far. If she thinks it is, she won't respond, and that'll be the end of it.

     

     

     
  • I have my own FFFC on a different note. We walked our dog over to my MIL's so she could see my MIL's dog. Our dog got tired so MIL offered to keep her over night and we were going to pick her up the next day. Well DH shot himself in the hand with a nail gun and got a bad infection. It winded up taking 2 days to get her. MIL seemed to be enjoying her and I kind of wished she offered to take her. DH even offered to buy her food for both dogs plus extra money every month and she refused (she is never working but always complaining she is broke so this is actually a good option for her). I know every dog lover is probably hating me right now but she is 6 and still a puppy. (example: I woke up to DS and the dog running out of the room. It took me 7 minutes to get upstairs. In those 7 minutes she ate the fresh rolls off our table and was tearing the garbage apart. This kind of things happens a few times a week at least) I don't have the time anymore with 2 kids and my own home. I also genuinely worry about her being around a newborn that may be on the floor. She is so hyper and runs in circles all day and she does not pay attention at all. If she was at MIL I would know she was safe and we could still visit all the time. I was bummed. It was the only option I'd really "give her away" so now it looks like she's all ours.

     imageimage

     


  • You said it was wrong, not irresponsible. I don't think anyone is going to argue with "irresponsible," but it being wrong? Define wrong. Did you mean they shouldn't if they made good choices, or did you mean they shouldn't be able to? You never said sterilize, but how would you enforce it? There's only one way. So, if you wouldn't do that, then you didn't really think about the first statement you made before you made it.
    Nicholssquared, love, I think you're reading way too much into this. You're taking a conversation about how it's responsible for people to wait to have kids until they can reasonably afford them, and turning it into a conversation about sterilization.
    Hmm...I was just trying to probe further into her position good-naturedly. Sterilization is the logical next step of what she was suggesting. I'm just trying to make sure that's clear, because most people who are of the opinion that it's wrong for poor people to have children make that statement without really understanding the consequences of that opinion.

    Like I said, I think everyone can agree that it's irresponsible. But she didn't say that at first - she said it was wrong. I don't think asking her to further clarify her position is taking it too far. If she thinks it is, she won't respond, and that'll be the end of it.

    I think you're focusing too much on "wrong".  I'm sure she wasn't using it as you believe.  A lot of people use "wrong" a little bit more loosely.  Like, if someone does something jacked up, I hear people say "oh man, that's just wrong". And that's what I got from her FFFC, she thinks it's jacked up that people who can't afford kids have them.

    photo b1f62123-e338-48e2-a2d8-373638902d4d.jpg 

  • zxifnswdjdfnzxifnswdjdfn member
    edited August 2013

    On the topic of fast food. We drove by Burger King yesterday and there was a sign saying we now accept EBT cards ( food stamps). I think if you are getting food money from the government you should have to buy your food from the grocery store. Going out to eat is a "treat" and if you can't afford to go out you should be cooking your family well balanced meals at home.

    EBT isn't just food stamps, it's also cash assistance. I'm going to have to assume that they'll accept cash assistance off an EBT because its illegal for someone to use food stamps on anything but actual groceries.

    ETA: Just saw the other posts says the exact same thing, so sorry for beating a dead horse.
    NOPE.
  • My confession is that I want an elective csection. I know they are riskier (generally) than VBs but I'm really worried about irreversible trauma to my pelvic organs, baby getting stuck, and oxygen deprivation. I doubt I'll ask for one bc I don't think my obgyn does them.

    image

    DS #1 born 12.3.13
    BFP #2 09.21.14 EDD: 06.06.15

    BabyFetus Ticker

  • You said it was wrong, not irresponsible. I don't think anyone is going to argue with "irresponsible," but it being wrong? Define wrong. Did you mean they shouldn't if they made good choices, or did you mean they shouldn't be able to? You never said sterilize, but how would you enforce it? There's only one way. So, if you wouldn't do that, then you didn't really think about the first statement you made before you made it.
    Nicholssquared, love, I think you're reading way too much into this. You're taking a conversation about how it's responsible for people to wait to have kids until they can reasonably afford them, and turning it into a conversation about sterilization.
    Hmm...I was just trying to probe further into her position good-naturedly. Sterilization is the logical next step of what she was suggesting. I'm just trying to make sure that's clear, because most people who are of the opinion that it's wrong for poor people to have children make that statement without really understanding the consequences of that opinion.

    Like I said, I think everyone can agree that it's irresponsible. But she didn't say that at first - she said it was wrong. I don't think asking her to further clarify her position is taking it too far. If she thinks it is, she won't respond, and that'll be the end of it.

    I think you're focusing too much on "wrong".  I'm sure she wasn't using it as you believe.  A lot of people use "wrong" a little bit more loosely.  Like, if someone does something jacked up, I hear people say "oh man, that's just wrong". And that's what I got from her FFFC, she thinks it's jacked up that people who can't afford kids have them.
    Fair enough. If she really meant it that way, then she and I are in agreement, and the discussion is over. It is irresponsible to have a child you can't provide the basic needs for.

    However, in the context of the original FFFC and the statements that were made early on, you can't deny that her original position was very unclear. And I still really don't think engaging in a good-natured discussion on the FFFC post is taking anything too far. Plenty of FFFCs have gone down in firey balls of death and rage, and I'm not anywhere close to that. I guess I just don't understand why people are randomly taking such issue with me inquiring further.

     

     

     
  • I don't know if I can handle two days in a row of the poor people should get jobs and stretch their pittance of EBT to make gourmet healthy meals bullshit. It's really easy to claim you've hit a home run through hard work and gumption when you're born on second base.

    See, these comments make me mad though. It is just as ignorant as any other comment in here. That is like saying anyone who is successful had help growing up. It is possible to become successful in this world when you come from NOTHING through hard work. My husband came from a low income town. His parents didn't give him a penny. Him and his siblings worked for everything they have. When DH was 16 (he is the youngest) his mom left him in the house by himself to be with her third husband. He was financially and in every way independent. He worked 2 jobs, went to school (graduated second in his class) then worked his way through college paid completely by himself (plus his car payments, bills, etc completely on his own). He still has student loans but he works his butt off to get where he is now with the help of nobody. 2 of his siblings did the same thing and 1 didn't go to school but worked his ass off in his trade and now lives very comfortably.

    I understand it is easier for people with help but it's not impossible for people in bad situations. My husband and all of his siblings managed to make something out of themselves without ever receiving one penny from anyone.

    It just makes me mad when people come on here and say my husband is so lazy I am leaving him then come on and say their salaries should be raised for doing nothing. Yes harder work could pay off. You want a full time job or a different job? Look for it! I don't feel bad for the person playing video games all day who plays the woe is me card when there are people like my husband who has worked his butt off. Do we really live in such an entitled country that we can't see that hard work pays off? And to be honest it's people who claim "people who come from bad situations can't go to school" or "Can't make anything of themselves" that further allow the entitlement. Everyone has opportunities. It's what you make of your situation.

     

    End rant. I am exiting this thread to eat a snickers before my head explodes haha.

    Some of the people here cracking on the poor for taking a free ride have previously admitted to coming from families who make six figures. Second base.
    No trust me. I completely get what you are saying. It's always easier to judge when you haven't had to be there. My only point is people not from second base can also make something of themselves if they choose to. It is harder but possible.

     imageimage

     


  • You said it was wrong, not irresponsible. I don't think anyone is going to argue with "irresponsible," but it being wrong? Define wrong. Did you mean they shouldn't if they made good choices, or did you mean they shouldn't be able to? You never said sterilize, but how would you enforce it? There's only one way. So, if you wouldn't do that, then you didn't really think about the first statement you made before you made it.
    Nicholssquared, love, I think you're reading way too much into this. You're taking a conversation about how it's responsible for people to wait to have kids until they can reasonably afford them, and turning it into a conversation about sterilization.
    Hmm...I was just trying to probe further into her position good-naturedly. Sterilization is the logical next step of what she was suggesting. I'm just trying to make sure that's clear, because most people who are of the opinion that it's wrong for poor people to have children make that statement without really understanding the consequences of that opinion.

    Like I said, I think everyone can agree that it's irresponsible. But she didn't say that at first - she said it was wrong. I don't think asking her to further clarify her position is taking it too far. If she thinks it is, she won't respond, and that'll be the end of it.

    I think you're focusing too much on "wrong".  I'm sure she wasn't using it as you believe.  A lot of people use "wrong" a little bit more loosely.  Like, if someone does something jacked up, I hear people say "oh man, that's just wrong". And that's what I got from her FFFC, she thinks it's jacked up that people who can't afford kids have them.
    Fair enough. If she really meant it that way, then she and I are in agreement, and the discussion is over. It is irresponsible to have a child you can't provide the basic needs for.

    However, in the context of the original FFFC and the statements that were made early on, you can't deny that her original position was very unclear. And I still really don't think engaging in a good-natured discussion on the FFFC post is taking anything too far. Plenty of FFFCs have gone down in firey balls of death and rage, and I'm not anywhere close to that. I guess I just don't understand why people are randomly taking such issue with me inquiring further.
    I think you nitpicked her words and changed them around to be honest. Then threw it to a whole different level by saying sterilization. Honestly, I wouldn't want to answer you either because you completely misconstrued her words. I got the sense she meant it was irresponsible. We've had girls on here say their husbands are lazy and don't work and they are on their second child. When you admit to struggling to take care of one then why add a second to the mix? It is irresponsible. A baby has basic needs that need to be met and if you can't meet them then all the love in the world isn't going to feed them or clothe them etc. A good parent can start off by making sure they wait to have kids until all their basic needs can be met. I think that is all she meant.

     imageimage

     

  • My FFFC:

    1) I threw up in my mouth a little bit when I logged on today and saw the FFFC thread was already over 100 posts.  Oi.

    2) I am legitimately concerned that my husband is on his way to developing Type II diabetes.  The man loves his sugar and carbs.  He can down two cans of coke in one meal.  LOVES his white rice - sometimes eat plain white rice for lunch (which is weird to me).  He adds sugar to koolaid mix (...shudder....).  When he has a glass of milk, he has a big, bar-sized glass of milk.  Same thing with his morning OJ.   I will fully admit to being sensitive about watching how people consume carbs and what kind of carbs.  I have tried pointing this out to him, offered to help him improve his eating habits, etc.  He's aware of how I feel, but really doesn't seem motivated to change anything.  And of course, I can't make him change, either.

    3) My university used to let people leave an hour or two early on days before vacations, but stopped that practice in the last year or so.  Out of protest (because no one's doing anything and students aren't contacting me anyway), I'm perhaps not as dedicated to being productive today as I should be. : )
    1) ME TOO.  

    2) Oh my g-d, this sounds like my husband when we met, only he was addicted to meat and I was a vegetarian.  I tricked him into getting a physical and when his cholesterol came back elevated I just kinda let the rest work itself out -- just kidding, I insisted on having conversation after conversation after conversation about it.  (Prior to my pregnancy, he'd been vegan for a year -- we're taking a break from veggie living until the baby is born because bacon and also maybe because pastrami)  I know how unsettling that can be. 
    :(

    3) This sounds like my Friday, too.  SOUL SISTERS 4EVA.
    image
    Lilypie - (V9Ze)

  • Fair enough. If she really meant it that way, then she and I are in agreement, and the discussion is over. It is irresponsible to have a child you can't provide the basic needs for.

    However, in the context of the original FFFC and the statements that were made early on, you can't deny that her original position was very unclear. And I still really don't think engaging in a good-natured discussion on the FFFC post is taking anything too far. Plenty of FFFCs have gone down in firey balls of death and rage, and I'm not anywhere close to that. I guess I just don't understand why people are randomly taking such issue with me inquiring further.
    You didn't just inquire though (i.e., "can you expand on what you mean by wrong?"), you jumped to a what is possibly the most extreme, implied solutions to the problem possible - sterilization. That's where I was like, "Whooooooa, Nelly.  Where did that come from?" 

    There's no problem with you inquiring further, I just felt it was a really, really big jump.
    I did ask her to define what she meant by wrong, if you go back and look.

     

     

     
  • On the topic of fast food. We drove by Burger King yesterday and there was a sign saying we now accept EBT cards ( food stamps). I think if you are getting food money from the government you should have to buy your food from the grocery store. Going out to eat is a "treat" and if you can't afford to go out you should be cooking your family well balanced meals at home.
    I was at Walgreens one day and the girl in front of me got pissed because there wasn't enough money on her EBT card to pay for her 10 candy bars. She then proceeded to pay for them in cash. Are you freaking kidding me?!
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • MEP923 said:

    I think you nitpicked her words and changed them around to be honest. Then threw it to a whole different level by saying sterilization. Honestly, I wouldn't want to answer you either because you completely misconstrued her words. I got the sense she meant it was irresponsible. We've had girls on here say their husbands are lazy and don't work and they are on their second child. When you admit to struggling to take care of one then why add a second to the mix? It is irresponsible. A baby has basic needs that need to be met and if you can't meet them then all the love in the world isn't going to feed them or clothe them etc. A good parent can start off by making sure they wait to have kids until all their basic needs can be met. I think that is all she meant.
    I will admit to using a common logical argument - it's called reducto ad absurdum, reducing their statements to the point of it being absurd, so as to more clearly point out the error in their thought process. Did I say she was for sterilizations, no, not directly. And clearly she isn't because she said so. However, pointing out that that's where that thought process is going, and that's it's a slippery slope was a perfectly valid way of illustrating my point. I didn't turn her words around. If she really meant irresponsible, she should have said so in the first place.

    And I understand using the FFFC thread to go back and forth about other people's positions on things, but I guess I feel like telling people they've gone too far when they're still being completely civil defeats the point. Why should anyone bring something up in the first place if they're going to get bashed for making comments on it? We tell that to our newbies all the time. I don't see how it's different.

     

     

     
  • I farted the other day while my fiance was in the other room and then blamed it on the cat.  He totally bought it.
    I farted yesterday and DS1 said, "What was that noise?" I was embarrassed and said, "well, what do you think it was?" And he said, "Vincent (DS2) tooted!"

    I didn't correct him. Flame away.
    Any day where there are two FFFCs involving farts is an OK day by me.  :-bd
    image
    Lilypie - (V9Ze)
  • My FFFC:  It really bothers me when I hear ladies say that their SOs get upset, pouty, sad, etc. when they don't get sex. 

    When I tell my DH I'm not in the mood, he's completely chill about it and even if it does bother him, he doesn't show it or make me feel bad about it. 

    With pregnancy, everyone sacrifices something and fortunately for DH the only thing he has to sacrifice is the frequency of sex; he realizes that and can deal with it.  He's not going to complain about sex knowing that my body is going through some crazy shit to produce OUR baby.

    Eh. I get it. I'd pout if DH repeatedly turned me down. Sex on the regular is one of the best things about being married. I think it's reasonable to express disappointment if your spouse isn't meeting your needs, be they sexual or emotional.
    D13 June Siggy Challenge Awkward (Awesome) Bathing Suits
    photo d5230f4f-07cc-4b75-b11c-da060b42a66d.jpg





  • You said it was wrong, not irresponsible. I don't think anyone is going to argue with "irresponsible," but it being wrong? Define wrong. Did you mean they shouldn't if they made good choices, or did you mean they shouldn't be able to? You never said sterilize, but how would you enforce it? There's only one way. So, if you wouldn't do that, then you didn't really think about the first statement you made before you made it.

    Nicholssquared, love, I think you're reading way too much into this. You're taking a conversation about how it's responsible for people to wait to have kids until they can reasonably afford them, and turning it into a conversation about sterilization.



    Hmm...I was just trying to probe further into her position good-naturedly. Sterilization is the logical next step of what she was suggesting. I'm just trying to make sure that's clear, because most people who are of the opinion that it's wrong for poor people to have children make that statement without really understanding the consequences of that opinion.

    Like I said, I think everyone can agree that it's irresponsible. But she didn't say that at first - she said it was wrong. I don't think asking her to further clarify her position is taking it too far. If she thinks it is, she won't respond, and that'll be the end of it.

    By wrong I meant the person made the wrong choice. Should something to be done to help people make better choices? Yes, better available birth control would be one. But I would never suggest we dicatate who can have a baby. I just think it is a wrong decision /poor choice to have a baby you can't feed.
    Btw I am off to work so I won't be able to comment further.





    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • My FFFC:  It really bothers me when I hear ladies say that their SOs get upset, pouty, sad, etc. when they don't get sex. 

    When I tell my DH I'm not in the mood, he's completely chill about it and even if it does bother him, he doesn't show it or make me feel bad about it. 

    With pregnancy, everyone sacrifices something and fortunately for DH the only thing he has to sacrifice is the frequency of sex; he realizes that and can deal with it.  He's not going to complain about sex knowing that my body is going through some crazy shit to produce OUR baby.

    Yeah, I side eye the crap out of people whose H complains about not getting any while they're pregnant. I have s friend who is pregnant and is still sick all the time and he complains about not getting any and that she SHOULD at least give him a bj, but she doesn't. What the hell? I wish all the men who are upset about not getting any while their SO is KU could feel half as sick as their SO. 
    Every once in a while H will give a pouty lip about not getting any and I say "sorry dear, I am busy making your child from scratch" and he says "I know, sorry you don't feel good" and we cuddle....well, more like he cuddles with the back of a leacho pregnancy pillow. (: 


    imageimage


    BFP #1 July 4, 2011 Baby girl born Feb 22, 2012!!
    BFP #2 December 17, 2012 MMC January 24, 2013
    BFP #3 April 7, 2013 Baby girl born December 11, 2013!!
    Amelia has Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome. She has had 3 open heart surgeries, 1 g-tube surgery, and one tracheostomy. She is the strongest, most precious little fighter. 
    You can follow her at. Www.ameliafaithsheart.blogspot.com
  • MEP923 said:

    I think you nitpicked her words and changed them around to be honest. Then threw it to a whole different level by saying sterilization. Honestly, I wouldn't want to answer you either because you completely misconstrued her words. I got the sense she meant it was irresponsible. We've had girls on here say their husbands are lazy and don't work and they are on their second child. When you admit to struggling to take care of one then why add a second to the mix? It is irresponsible. A baby has basic needs that need to be met and if you can't meet them then all the love in the world isn't going to feed them or clothe them etc. A good parent can start off by making sure they wait to have kids until all their basic needs can be met. I think that is all she meant.
    I will admit to using a common logical argument - it's called reducto ad absurdum, reducing their statements to the point of it being absurd, so as to more clearly point out the error in their thought process. Did I say she was for sterilizations, no, not directly. And clearly she isn't because she said so. However, pointing out that that's where that thought process is going, and that's it's a slippery slope was a perfectly valid way of illustrating my point. I didn't turn her words around. If she really meant irresponsible, she should have said so in the first place.

    And I understand using the FFFC thread to go back and forth about other people's positions on things, but I guess I feel like telling people they've gone too far when they're still being completely civil defeats the point. Why should anyone bring something up in the first place if they're going to get bashed for making comments on it? We tell that to our newbies all the time. I don't see how it's different.
    I think it's because people keep egging others on when the discussion is clearly at a point where it can be stopped. It's like repeatedly poking somebody lightly until they snap and then saying "god why are you getting so upset?!" Nobody is changing any minds in this thread and it's really just beating a dead horse.
    I really don't think I'm doing that. FTR, if she had stopped responding then, it would have been over, except I felt the need to defend myself to other people for merely engaging in conversation.

     

     

     
  • MEP923 said:

    I think you nitpicked her words and changed them around to be honest. Then threw it to a whole different level by saying sterilization. Honestly, I wouldn't want to answer you either because you completely misconstrued her words. I got the sense she meant it was irresponsible. We've had girls on here say their husbands are lazy and don't work and they are on their second child. When you admit to struggling to take care of one then why add a second to the mix? It is irresponsible. A baby has basic needs that need to be met and if you can't meet them then all the love in the world isn't going to feed them or clothe them etc. A good parent can start off by making sure they wait to have kids until all their basic needs can be met. I think that is all she meant.
    I will admit to using a common logical argument - it's called reducto ad absurdum, reducing their statements to the point of it being absurd, so as to more clearly point out the error in their thought process. Did I say she was for sterilizations, no, not directly. And clearly she isn't because she said so. However, pointing out that that's where that thought process is going, and that's it's a slippery slope was a perfectly valid way of illustrating my point. I didn't turn her words around. If she really meant irresponsible, she should have said so in the first place.

    And I understand using the FFFC thread to go back and forth about other people's positions on things, but I guess I feel like telling people they've gone too far when they're still being completely civil defeats the point. Why should anyone bring something up in the first place if they're going to get bashed for making comments on it? We tell that to our newbies all the time. I don't see how it's different.


    Yes the FFFC is meant so you can argue with somebody's point. It's not meant to change someone's point completely to make it work with your own opinion. You can disagree with her but don't change what she said. People argue with people's FFFC all the time. Look at this one but you took it to a whole different level. The difference between wrong and irresponsible? Who cares?

    And sterilization? Seriously? She didn't even say they shouldn't have kids, she said it was wrong. Wrong meaning wrong at that time. And yes it is wrong to bring a baby into the world when you can't provide it's basic needs. It doesn't mean you need to be sterilized. It means you should wait until you are in a better place. I think that is obvious to most people. So for you to connect one thing to another was just plain stupid no matter what fancy word you put on it.

    Have our own opinion. Just stop changing what other people said. That's where you are wrong. I am very seriously not arguing this anymore because I don't really care enough.

     imageimage

     


  • You said it was wrong, not irresponsible. I don't think anyone is going to argue with "irresponsible," but it being wrong? Define wrong. Did you mean they shouldn't if they made good choices, or did you mean they shouldn't be able to? You never said sterilize, but how would you enforce it? There's only one way. So, if you wouldn't do that, then you didn't really think about the first statement you made before you made it.
    Nicholssquared, love, I think you're reading way too much into this. You're taking a conversation about how it's responsible for people to wait to have kids until they can reasonably afford them, and turning it into a conversation about sterilization.
    Hmm...I was just trying to probe further into her position good-naturedly. Sterilization is the logical next step of what she was suggesting. I'm just trying to make sure that's clear, because most people who are of the opinion that it's wrong for poor people to have children make that statement without really understanding the consequences of that opinion.

    Like I said, I think everyone can agree that it's irresponsible. But she didn't say that at first - she said it was wrong. I don't think asking her to further clarify her position is taking it too far. If she thinks it is, she won't respond, and that'll be the end of it.
    By wrong I meant the person made the wrong choice. Should something to be done to help people make better choices? Yes, better available birth control would be one. But I would never suggest we dictate who can have a baby. I just think it is a wrong decision /poor choice to have a baby you can't feed. Btw I am off to work so I won't be able to comment further.
    Thank you for clarifying! I thought we might be in agreement, but I hope you don't hold it against me that I was trying to make sure.

     

     

     
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"