October 2019 Moms

** Oct19 Mummies Private Group Info **

13»

Re: ** Oct19 Mummies Private Group Info **

  • I can see newbies that haven’t put in much of an effort being excluded. But I am bummed to be excluded and to feel untrustworthy with this being my third BMB. Forming a PG is new to me because my other 2 went to Fb post baby so there was still months to be an active member and contribute. 

    I dont want to join a separate PG or Fb group just for the sake of joining one. I like the liveliness of a larger group and don’t want to be in one with say 12 people. 

    image

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker






    Me (32) DH (34) | |
    BFP #1 4/5/12 | Natural m/c on 4/18/12 (6w1d)
    BFP #2 8/23/12 | DS born 5/3/13
    BFP #3 12/6/15 | DD born 8/23/16
    BFP #4 2/22/19 | EDD 10/28/19
  • Loading the player...
  • @telicious2 this is my 3rd too and the previous groups went to fb so this pg thing is new to me also. Hopefully a fb group is made later bc I am more likely to check fb anyways.  Not that I have much time for social media having 2 littles already though haha
  • dogmom5 said:
    @telicious2 this is my 3rd too and the previous groups went to fb so this pg thing is new to me also. Hopefully a fb group is made later bc I am more likely to check fb anyways.  Not that I have much time for social media having 2 littles already though haha
    Yeah, I'm not on here as often as I would like with two little ones and we just moved but I check FB waayyyy more than I do this app. I'm not upset about not being in the PG because I hardly ever post on here but it definitely seems like it was a crappy PG process. I'm sorry there are so many frustrated people ☹️
  • And and to elaborate more with my rambling two cents, I think it was a bigger blow to previous BMB users that weren’t able to be as regular or communicative. But were still active and offered support and advice when able to. 


    image

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker






    Me (32) DH (34) | |
    BFP #1 4/5/12 | Natural m/c on 4/18/12 (6w1d)
    BFP #2 8/23/12 | DS born 5/3/13
    BFP #3 12/6/15 | DD born 8/23/16
    BFP #4 2/22/19 | EDD 10/28/19
  • jenferlee82jenferlee82 member
    edited July 2019
    And and to elaborate more with my rambling two cents, I think it was a bigger blow to previous BMB users that weren’t able to be as regular or communicative. But were still active and offered support and advice when able to. 


    So, may I ask - if you were not able to be regular or communicative, how would you expect folks to want to open up to you in a PG? I’m genuinely curious because I’m really struggling to follow this logic but would like to understand. 

    Edited because autocorrect 
  • @jenferlee82 Like sammygirl18 said, it would have been nice to have the PG as the get to know everyone better group. And if some users were let into the PG but remained more of a lurker (say after 2 weeks time) then maybe the mods would have the power to remove people for remaining inactive? Had I thought of this stipulation I would have brought it up when the criteria for the PG was being discussed. And I totally agree with lurkers from the start or those with barely any posting history being excluded from the PG. 
    image

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker






    Me (32) DH (34) | |
    BFP #1 4/5/12 | Natural m/c on 4/18/12 (6w1d)
    BFP #2 8/23/12 | DS born 5/3/13
    BFP #3 12/6/15 | DD born 8/23/16
    BFP #4 2/22/19 | EDD 10/28/19
  • I do feel for people who were not voted into the PG. I truly do. But wouldn't it be worse to be voted OUT of it due to inactivity?
    *TW in Spoiler*BabyFetus Ticker

    Me 39 - DH 41

    Married 8/26/07

    TTGP #1 Jan '15 - 

         BFP 9/11/15 - DS born 5/31/16

    TTGP #2 July '17 -

         CP July '17

         Blighted Ovum MC Dec '17

         CP June '18

         BFP 1/30/19 - EDD 10/13/19

Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"