2nd Trimester

How do you feel about vaccinations?

My SO and I are butting heads about whether or not we are vaccinating our LO. I think some are necessary, and he thinks that we shouldn't at all. How do you feel about vaccinating your LOs?
«1

Re: How do you feel about vaccinations?

  • Loading the player...
  • Kayciejoe56Kayciejoe56 member
    edited May 2015
    Working in the autism field, this is something I hear about a lot, from both sides. For my child, I will vaccinate, since I myself have not seen enough evidence, to risk it. However, we will do a modified schedule. While I know my child needs them, there is no reason to overload a small baby with so much. We will spread them out, and eliminate a few less crucial shots. Decreasing the amount of shots each visit helps narrow it down if there is a reaction, and helps baby have time to process before the next round.

    I agree with PP that you need to do your own research. Do what you are comfortable with. I will loosely be following dr. sears schedule, but there are lots of alternative schedules out there.
  • Here's a great NOVA episode on vaccines, hopefully it can help with your research.

  • My child will be vaccinated without a doubt.
  • nofrogsnofrogs member
    edited May 2015
    We butted heads over this as well. I wanted vaccines, hubby was influenced by his family and didn't want them. Our compromise was Dr. Sear's delayed schedule. DD is almost fully vaccinated now, but we did skip the rotavirus. Some people really hate the Dr. Sears Vaccine book, but my daughter wouldn't have been vaccinated without it.

    I found the CDC website to be really informative as well. 
    Anniversary
  • Both of my daughters have gotten every vaccine the pediatrician said they needed and they have never had adverse reactions. One of my best friends has a special needs child (they cannot figure out what is going on with her) and she always had bad reactions to vaccines, so they have chosen not to vaccinate their second child. While I would never feel comfortable with that, I see their side with all they have been through especially knowing their oldest always reacted poorly to them. With children who don't have adverse reactions, there is no reason not to. There is no Mercury by-products in them anymore and the "link" to Autism has been proven false. My grandmother died of polio. Why risk any preventable deadly disease?
  • We vaccinate and have friends that don't. Find a compromise that works for your family.
    Lilypie Breastfeeding tickers Lilypie Angel and Memorial tickers
    Parent of Baby Boy M, born December 2013 Angels: Miscarriage @ 9 weeks, May 2015, Chemical Pregnancy November 2015



    Lilypie Maternity tickers
  • Vaccinate. It is the responsible thing to do both for the health of your child and those in society who rely on "herd immunity". The only reason parents of this generation buy into the anti-vax nonsense is because they have never lived in a world where smallpox, polio, measles and mumps were real threats....but if this keeps up then our kids will.
  • delujm0delujm0 member
    We never thought twice about it...we will vaccinate on schedule.

    Something to think about...when we visited pediatricians, every office we went to said they wouldn't accept families that refused to vaccinate on a regular or slightly modified schedule as patients. That was a huge plus for us...but if you don't plan to vaccinate you better start looking for a doctor now...it won't be easy to find one.
  • My SO and I are butting heads about whether or not we are vaccinating our LO. I think some are necessary, and he thinks that we shouldn't at all. How do you feel about vaccinating your LOs?

    All are necessary. Even the chicken pox can be deadly. I would not be willing to parent with someone who is willing to be so reckless with my child's health. 
    DS1: BFP 04/03/11 | EDD 12/02/11 | born 11/21/11 
    DS2: BFP 02/09/13 | EDD 10/26/13 | said goodbye 06/02/13
  • I think children should absolutely be vaccinated. Diseases have been irradicated for a reason! It is very irresponsible to not vaccinate and put your child and others at risk. I'm thankful that most schools now require it and that "not believing in them" is no longer a valid excuse.
  • We will be vaccinating on the recommended schedule.
    CafeMom Tickers

  • I will vaccinate. Absolutely. No question. I love my baby way too much to put him/ her at risk. Also, because as much as people can be wonderful, good, loving people... you can't really trust all people. So we'll vaccinate to protect our child as well as others and maybe, just maybe, we can help prevent one more sick child in the world. 
  • Peony1982 said:

    My SO and I are butting heads about whether or not we are vaccinating our LO. I think some are necessary, and he thinks that we shouldn't at all. How do you feel about vaccinating your LOs?




    Unless your SO has "M.D." After his name, tell him to suck an egg.
    Even if he does, tell him the same thing, as more (quantity and qualified) MDs support vaccines.
  • kaybee03kaybee03 member
    edited May 2015
    We are absolutely vaccinating. The measles scare recently is a perfect example of WHY! 
    ----------------------------
    BFP#1: 01.06.2015 ... Baby Boy Due Date: 9.14.2015 FTM! :)
  • I know this is against popular opinion, but we have decided against it. We have no problem with people that chose to vaccinate their children, but for us we just don't feel good about it. We would rather give our children's immune system a chance at growing stronger on its own before pumping them full of things we aren't really sure they need. Now don't get me wrong, if they are sick, then we will do everything and give them anything to make them better. But to just give it to them by the off chance they may get sick doesn't make sense to us.
  • We are absolutely vaccinating on the recommended schedule. IMO, people who don't vaccinate (other than for legitimate medical reasons) are selfish, irresponsible, and reckless.

    It's interesting and worth noting that of the 27 people who have responded to this post, only 1 doesn't plan to vaccinate. That's roughly the percentage of Americans who don't vaccinate (3-5%), but it's enough to compromise herd immunity for everyone. You need only look at the recent measles outbreaks to see that.


  • Okay, I read this and I just have an honest question. Not trying to point fingers or anything, I just need clarification! So if I am reading correctly she had children with some vaccinations and some without, and they all got sick?
  • morbid007 said:



    Okay, I read this and I just have an honest question. Not trying to point fingers or anything, I just need clarification! So if I am reading correctly she had children with some vaccinations and some without, and they all got sick?
    The ones who received their initial vaccinations did not receive the necessary booster shots and thus their immunity dropped down to nearly 0%. https://thescientificparent.org/with-7-kids-in-recovery-from-whooping-cough-tara-hills-answers-your-questions/
  • csy2947 said:

    morbid007 said:

    I know this is against popular opinion, but we have decided against it. We have no problem with people that chose to vaccinate their children, but for us we just don't feel good about it. We would rather give our children's immune system a chance at growing stronger on its own before pumping them full of things we aren't really sure they need. Now don't get me wrong, if they are sick, then we will do everything and give them anything to make them better. But to just give it to them by the off chance they may get sick doesn't make sense to us.

    Do you plan to home school?

    I only ask because in my opinion there are two big flaws with the parents' choice movement. The first is the lack of the child's autonomy but I understand that is a slippery slope and we can't legislate an idea of good parenting. But the other is that your choice could very easily endanger other people's children in a real and scary way. For example, if you allowed your child to go near another mother's infant in a stroller or at a park you could expose the infant to pertussis which could be fatal. Or if you were visiting a relative at a hospital and your child encountered a cancer survivor at school who had lowered immune system responses they could become very ill.

    I'm trying not to seem like I'm attacking, this is something I genuinely don't understand about anti vaxxers, how they reconcile that risk to others concept.
    We don't plan on homeschooling. I guess my question is, even with these vaccinations, isn't there still a chance that you will get sick?
    I have been around many, many children and it seems to me that the ones that are up to date on vaccinations are much sicker in general. Please understand. It's not that I am 100% against vaccinations, I just think that I would like to give my child's body a chance before I start pumping them full of medicine. Your immune system will get stronger the more you are exposed to the outside world. And I believe these vaccinations were fantastic when they were created! We needed them, but I also believe we needed them because we weren't as medically advanced as we are now. Most people don't die of a fever or dehydration now a days.
    If for school my children need them, then my husband and I agreed we will revisit the decision. As for now though, I just don't feel comfortable with it.
  • delujm0 said:

    morbid007 said:

    csy2947 said:

    morbid007 said:

    I know this is against popular opinion, but we have decided against it. We have no problem with people that chose to vaccinate their children, but for us we just don't feel good about it. We would rather give our children's immune system a chance at growing stronger on its own before pumping them full of things we aren't really sure they need. Now don't get me wrong, if they are sick, then we will do everything and give them anything to make them better. But to just give it to them by the off chance they may get sick doesn't make sense to us.

    Do you plan to home school?

    I only ask because in my opinion there are two big flaws with the parents' choice movement. The first is the lack of the child's autonomy but I understand that is a slippery slope and we can't legislate an idea of good parenting. But the other is that your choice could very easily endanger other people's children in a real and scary way. For example, if you allowed your child to go near another mother's infant in a stroller or at a park you could expose the infant to pertussis which could be fatal. Or if you were visiting a relative at a hospital and your child encountered a cancer survivor at school who had lowered immune system responses they could become very ill.

    I'm trying not to seem like I'm attacking, this is something I genuinely don't understand about anti vaxxers, how they reconcile that risk to others concept.
    We don't plan on homeschooling. I guess my question is, even with these vaccinations, isn't there still a chance that you will get sick?
    I have been around many, many children and it seems to me that the ones that are up to date on vaccinations are much sicker in general. Please understand. It's not that I am 100% against vaccinations, I just think that I would like to give my child's body a chance before I start pumping them full of medicine. Your immune system will get stronger the more you are exposed to the outside world. And I believe these vaccinations were fantastic when they were created! We needed them, but I also believe we needed them because we weren't as medically advanced as we are now. Most people don't die of a fever or dehydration now a days.
    If for school my children need them, then my husband and I agreed we will revisit the decision. As for now though, I just don't feel comfortable with it.
    I don't get this logic.

    Yes, even if you keep up with vaccines and boosters, there is still a chance that your child will get sick. But that chance is very significantly lower if you have vaccinated, and those that are vaccinated often have less fatal responses to the disease. Why would you want your kid, for example, to have a 10% chance of getting fatal whooping cough when if he had been vaccinated that chance is lower than 1%?

    Unless your child is allergic to the vaccine or has an autoimmune disorder or other issue that precludes his ability to receive the vaccine, there is zero risk associated with getting the vaccine itself. So why would you not get a risk free as-close-to-guarantee-as-you-can-get against a disease? Why even bother taking your chances?

    Seriously though you should do research on what these diseases actually look like. People in other countries where they are prevalent would kill for the vaccines that you think are unnecessary. And the more people in this country that don't get them, the closer we get to having the diseases be regularly present in our society again.
    I have done my research and will continue to do so. A majority of these diseases went away before the vaccinations even came about, all through proper sanitation, hygiene and nutrition.
    Research has found that those who are vaccinated are more susceptible to these illnesses. Our immune system recognizes and "attacks" viruses that come through our mouth, eyes and nose, it's not the same coming though a needle into our body. And the vaccinations, at best, only boost our immunity temporarily.
    I just find it difficult to trust companies and organizations who's number one goal is to make money, not for the safety of my child.
  • delujm0delujm0 member
    morbid007 said:

    delujm0 said:

    morbid007 said:

    csy2947 said:

    morbid007 said:

    I know this is against popular opinion, but we have decided against it. We have no problem with people that chose to vaccinate their children, but for us we just don't feel good about it. We would rather give our children's immune system a chance at growing stronger on its own before pumping them full of things we aren't really sure they need. Now don't get me wrong, if they are sick, then we will do everything and give them anything to make them better. But to just give it to them by the off chance they may get sick doesn't make sense to us.

    Do you plan to home school?

    I only ask because in my opinion there are two big flaws with the parents' choice movement. The first is the lack of the child's autonomy but I understand that is a slippery slope and we can't legislate an idea of good parenting. But the other is that your choice could very easily endanger other people's children in a real and scary way. For example, if you allowed your child to go near another mother's infant in a stroller or at a park you could expose the infant to pertussis which could be fatal. Or if you were visiting a relative at a hospital and your child encountered a cancer survivor at school who had lowered immune system responses they could become very ill.

    I'm trying not to seem like I'm attacking, this is something I genuinely don't understand about anti vaxxers, how they reconcile that risk to others concept.
    We don't plan on homeschooling. I guess my question is, even with these vaccinations, isn't there still a chance that you will get sick?
    I have been around many, many children and it seems to me that the ones that are up to date on vaccinations are much sicker in general. Please understand. It's not that I am 100% against vaccinations, I just think that I would like to give my child's body a chance before I start pumping them full of medicine. Your immune system will get stronger the more you are exposed to the outside world. And I believe these vaccinations were fantastic when they were created! We needed them, but I also believe we needed them because we weren't as medically advanced as we are now. Most people don't die of a fever or dehydration now a days.
    If for school my children need them, then my husband and I agreed we will revisit the decision. As for now though, I just don't feel comfortable with it.
    I don't get this logic.

    Yes, even if you keep up with vaccines and boosters, there is still a chance that your child will get sick. But that chance is very significantly lower if you have vaccinated, and those that are vaccinated often have less fatal responses to the disease. Why would you want your kid, for example, to have a 10% chance of getting fatal whooping cough when if he had been vaccinated that chance is lower than 1%?

    Unless your child is allergic to the vaccine or has an autoimmune disorder or other issue that precludes his ability to receive the vaccine, there is zero risk associated with getting the vaccine itself. So why would you not get a risk free as-close-to-guarantee-as-you-can-get against a disease? Why even bother taking your chances?

    Seriously though you should do research on what these diseases actually look like. People in other countries where they are prevalent would kill for the vaccines that you think are unnecessary. And the more people in this country that don't get them, the closer we get to having the diseases be regularly present in our society again.
    I have done my research and will continue to do so. A majority of these diseases went away before the vaccinations even came about, all through proper sanitation, hygiene and nutrition.
    Research has found that those who are vaccinated are more susceptible to these illnesses. Our immune system recognizes and "attacks" viruses that come through our mouth, eyes and nose, it's not the same coming though a needle into our body. And the vaccinations, at best, only boost our immunity temporarily.
    I just find it difficult to trust companies and organizations who's number one goal is to make money, not for the safety of my child.
    I trust that you have a medical degree? Or at least advanced schooling on the adequacy of research studies based on their testing methods so that you can make sure the ones you are using are trustworthy? If so go on with your bad self.

    I just find it hard to believe that if the FDA came out tomorrow and said "guess what? We have found and fully tested a cancer vaccine. If you get this shot once, your chances of getting any kind of cancer in your lifetime drops below 1%! It is now available for everyone!" that there are people out there that wouldn't get that vaccine.

    The reason people think measles vaccines aren't helpful is because the vaccines basically irraticated measles in this country years ago. If we were talking about a cancer vaccine right now, I am willing to bet thar most people would be all over that one. But really there is no difference in the logic here.
  • slhawkins25slhawkins25 member
    edited May 2015
    @morbid007 simply Google an educational video, or just YouTube a video of baby's who contract pertussis or whooping cough. If that alone doesn't pull at your heartstrings...well I have nothing more to say. I most definitely will be vaccinating my children for their safety and every other persons safety.

    ETA: I really mean nothing personal nor am i attempting to be snarky in any way. I took a child psych class when I was 22, one day happened to be centered around vaccines. From a simple heartbreaking lesson and video, I forever vowed I would vaccinate. To each their own though.
  • I'd also suggest find a doctor soon cause most are starting to deny patients if they're not going to vaccinate.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"