I'm a doctor specializing in internal medicine and pregnant with my first child.
I've been through obstetrics and gynae as a medical student and I'm well aware of risks vs. benefits of caesarean vs. NVD (normal vaginal delivery)
C section pros- planned delivery, no risk of 1st, 2nd or 3rd deg vaginal tear, reduced risk of future uterine prolapse and stress incontinence, haha no uncertainty regarding when you will deliver. I've seen primips be in and out of labor ward ... taking hours to reach 10cm then only to realize there is cephalopelvic disproportion needing c section anyway.
c section cons - well I am subjecting used to anaesthesia, spinal now a days still. Includes intra op and post op risks not all inclusive but includes things like infection, haemmorhage, pulmonary embolism, longer hospital stay (only by 1 or 2 days) and then there are risks in of placenta previa / percreta / accreta in future pregnancy possibly requiring a hysterectomy (I've seen this in people without hx of c section too though)
So anyone here ever consider caesarean by maternal request ??? I know my mother had 3 LSCS with no issues at all. I'm considering NVD but ...... I'm just thinking what y'all ladies are thinking.
love
Parsa
Re: C section by maternal requests
RE appointment & testing December 2013 - February 2014= Unexplained IF, possible endometriosis
IUI#1- March 22 (100mg clomid, 75 mg of Bravelle, Ovidrel trigger) = BFP!!!
With DS I had what they called a 'precipitous birth', he was taken almost immediately from my arms to the Special Care Nursery for breathing problems. I couldn't hold him for the first 12 hours and when I could he was hooked up to wires. In the end, it all turned out fine and we were both released 48 hours later. They told me that because of his speedy entrance into the world he did not have the benefit of being squeezed through the birth canal and that his problems were more consistently seen with c/s babies. One nurse said how perfectly shaped his head was (he had no coning) and I said, "He looks like a c/s baby" and the nurse said, "He pretty much was." You still blame yourself, but at least when DS when in the Special Care Nursery I had the benefit of knowing that nothing could have been done to prevent it, I went into spontaneous labor and just delivered very fast, but imagine how I would have felt had I chosen a c/s for no medical reason?
Yet women here where I am from do it all the time. It's not a good thing, it can cause havoc for your next pregnancy (which I see as the biggest turn off...uterine rupture, placenta previa)
(although I've seen nvds go terribly wrong, maybe asian women > smaller > higher chance of cephalopelvic disproportion ? haha just a theory
I've just seen too many brutal instrumental deliveries and conversion to LSCS during my 4 months as a student
I am from Singapore where "LSCS by maternal request" is a lot more common than in United States / UK (a lot of my relatives had it) I just wanted to know why they made this choice.
Haha I know my mom made this choice as she was scared of labor.
But how about the rest.
No doctor recommends LSCS in Sg unless you have pre eclampsia, large baby, gestational DM or another proper indication. However there is a growing trend of "maternal request LSCS", I'm guessing that's not happening in United States
Surgeons can be too knife happy sometimes
Dx: balanced translocation and LPD
TTC since Oct 2011
BPF 02/19/12, EDD 10/31/12, natural m/c 02/28/12 (4w6d)
IVF (BCPs starting 10/30/12, ER 11/18/12, 5dt of 1 beautiful, healthy embryo 11/23/12)
BFP 12/02/12, u/s @ 6w,5d showed 2 HBs! Identical twins!!
Bed rest from 21w-35w due to short cervix, hospital bed rest from 23w-32w due to PTL
Our rainbows were born 07/19/13 (36w, 5d)
bfp#4 3/19/2014 edd 12/1/2014 please let this be the one!
beta @ 5w0d = 12,026! u/s 4/22/14 @ 8w1d it's twins!
The risks of a C-section accrue almost entirely to the mother. There are risks to baby from being delivered vaginally - ask the women who have shoulder dystocia. Women have the right to make informed medical decisions about method of birth, and IMO it's telling that so many OB-GYNS and urogynecologists support elective C-sections. They treat women with prolapse and incontinence decades after pregnancy and childbirth, so they understand that vaginal deliveries carry certain risks and long-lasting negative effects that some women might prefer to avoid.
Married Bio * BFP Charts
One of my best friends died trying to give birth to her daughter vaginally. I was due 2 days before the 1 yr anniversary of her death. The thought of dying the same way she did was more terrifying than I can express. Wanting a c-section was my choice. And I'm thankful my OB understood and supported my decision.
But if you want to continue to be arrogant and judgemental, then nothing anyone says will makes you stop and consider someone else's point of view.
I don't believe in coddling or enabling people either, but I do believe in allowing them to make their own informed decisions.
I should have been more clear. I was trying to say that my opinions, not just on childbirth, are made from research and experience. I, personally, don't form opinions by judging others, which is what was said.
My entire point was that no one knows the reasons someone else chooses a c-sections, and the risks that come along with it, and we shouldn't be so quick to judge them. I gave my situation as an example only. I am very comfortable with the fact that I had a c-section. I'm not seeking anyone's approval. I could have used different examples (sexual abuse for instance) but since I haven't been in that situation, I don't think it's right for me to speculate.
My point, which is clearly being missed, is that YOU don't know why someone chooses a c-section and it is completely arrogant to think that you know what is best for someone else.
This has clearly dissolved from a constructive discussion into a childish argument ( I'm at fault too), so we should probably stop.