There aren't many in our area but I found a few. I checked one out on Tuesday and was underwhelmed with the lack of structure. I'm worried that Montessori sounds good on paper but is difficult/ impossible to execute. Does anyone have any experience with Montessori?
Re: Montessori preschool/ daycares
DS1 has been at a Montessori school for just about a year now. It's been great for him. I like the child-led learning approach (and so does he - he always tells me what he "worked with" that day), but that they also do a lot of stuff as a group that traditional daycares might not do - for instance, they garden and go on nature walks. The kid can name like 8 times more birds and plants than I can.
It's taught him a lot of important skills and how to be more independent and he's just learned a ton in general. To be honest, we weren't necessarily looking for a Montessori but he aged out of his old daycare and wait lists here are insane for daycares. This was the first we were able to get into, and now that we will be moving in the next months or so, I definitely plan on enrolling him in a Montessori school in our new location.
My daughter attends a traditional Montessori preschool (not daycare, although they do offer before and aftercare that about 1/3 of the students attend) for kids 3-6. I really feel like the Montessori way of teaching is one that you, especially as a new parent, have to have faith in at first, and you will very likely see the proof of your patience as the months move along.
For us, the lack of structure was what I liked about Montessori--for me, it was important that my 3-4 year old was not doing table work most of the day, or just playing with toys (which is what we saw at some of the other daycare preschools we visited). I wanted to make sure she had the freedom to work on what she wanted, with who she wanted, in a non-classroom like atmosphere. I was not looking for a true "academic" experience at this age--that is what elementary school is for. She is learning through work and experiences she has with the materials rather than from worksheets and textbooks. Her classroom is "unstructured" from 8:30-10:30 for the kids to choose/do their own work with the classroom materials, and then from 10:30-11 they do line time and then go walk over to our local park to play before lunch.
I have been completely blown away with the academic progress she has made, in addition to the "life skills" she has picked up in her first year (she started right after she turned 3 and her class is a mix of 3-6 year olds working together). She knows all of her letter sounds and is using the movable alphabet to create simple words, counts (not just 1, 2, 3 but in tens as well), does simple math (knows addition and subtraction up to 10+10), and also has a great understanding of the world (continents and countries) and the solar system. As I said, this has all been icing on the cake for me because I really had very little expectation of academic progress while in preschool.
She is also progressing well socially. Because she has kids ages 3-6 in her classroom, she has the ability to learn from the older ones (and they get the chance to model, teach and lead behavior). She is also super self sufficient and independent-- at the age of 3, she was getting herself dressed/bathroom in the morning (including shoes and zipping coat), follows directions really well, and because of the "family style lunch with grace and manners" they do, has really great table skills (sets the table at home, clears the plates, wipes the table while we do dishes).
Very long answer--but I don't regret our decision (even with the hefty tuition checks we write each month) at all, and it has been a great experience for us. In fact, we have the option of switching her to a good Pre-K program at her future (private, Catholic) elementery school next year for half of what we pay now, and we are keeping her at Montessori for another year.
Will baby #3 be another girl?
]
LO is in Montessori and DH is the head of school for one (sister school of LO's). I really like it so far for LO. I feel he's thriving there. That being said, like any program, it's not for everyone, you have to see about your comfort level and the type of personality your LO has...because everyone learns different, so what's best for one isn't best for another necessarily.
They seem to have a scheduled regimine despite allowing the children to choose the "work" they do. They have snacks/lunch/nap/outdoor and everything at a certain time, story time, circle time, and then the teachers allow kids to choose their work and work individually with each kid on different skills.
I also like the idea that teaching is part of the learning process for the kids to master skills. So, after a child has mastered a certain skill individually, they then get the opportunity to teach that skill to someone trying to learn it. I think it really helps them understand the skill when they have to teach it to someone else and embeds it in their minds.
In this case, I would look for memberships or affiliations with a program like the American Montessori Society or American Montessori International. I know at our school they have to have at least have one admin be Montessori qualified for programming purposes, and one teacher in the classroom (99% of the time the lead teacher) Montessori qualified. If the teacher isn't qualified, I'd ask how long they have been teaching in that style...they may have the knowledge just not the certification.
I just enrolled DS into the montessori I toured last week. DD attended a montessori and I was simply amazed at how much she grew when left to self select the items that interested her. I was very nervous about a three to four year old with a glass pitcher to pour water into a glass cup, but she mastered this.
The school you described sounds like either the person who did the tour is not qualified to provide the tour OR they don't really follow the philosophy. I would look at a few others before giving up - and another mom on this board suggested Yelp - I hadn't checked there and did, as well as Great Schools - and was pleased with the reviews.
We actually use an at home caretaker similar to a nanny/sitter. However, she has an AP/Montessori approach instead of a structured daycare or preschool. We did send our oldest to a small, private preschool after he turned 4. However the difference between him and two close friends that are the same age and went to a highly ranked (and priced!) traditional preschool are huge. Not only are my boys adapting and learning music, art and open play, but they seem to behave better than the other kids that were in a structured, rigid scheduled preschool that pushed and only focused on reading/writing.
We don't have a Montessori school in our area, so we skipped the traditional daycare and preschool and hoped our caretaker would follow our parental approach and she did. I know it's not perfect but sometimes at a young age, too much structure and scheduling backfires and kids don't do well in a traditional setting when its time for full day Kindergarten or 1st grade.
My DD started at a traditional daycare and moved into a Montessori program when she was 2.5 (she's now 4), it is great for her as she is very independent, determined, competitive and driven. She has been in the same primary class since she started so there have always been older kids there for her to learn along with (hence the competitive streak). She will choose work over play most times (driven) and will do it herself. I know not every Montessori is the same, but my daughter can write, read small words (3 letters long), knows all the states and continents, can tell me about the solar system, mammals, reptiles, artists, and the digestive system.
Kids are sponges, so if you talk about the continents over and over for a week they will absorb it- the same applies to a traditional daycare. I found that some (not all) traditional daycares are just that- a place to drop your kid with supervision. While some do work off a curriculum, some just have playtime most of the day. Some kids do great with that, mine doesn't.
But- you walk into her classroom and there are no traditional toys- no dolls, trucks, balls, etc. It's all "work materials"- and she thinks that doing "work" is fun so she knows no different. My nephew is a very rambunctious four year old and would probably not excel in that environment because he is used to toys, movies, tv shows, etc.
Look at a few different ones; I looked at three within a few miles of each other and while they all follow the same curriculum, they were very different.
I did doubt the ability for a three and six year old to simultaneously coexist in a learning environment and both develop at their levels, but it works at our school.
My son started a few weeks ago, but he's only three months so I'm not sure what the infant program will be like.