haha, not that you were calling me crazy, but I decided to look into my theory from jnk's post.
For those who don't want to go back. I asked about jnk's DH's siblings and brothers children in her gender guess post. This is because I believe that when a male has all male sons, and a couple of his sons has only sons, it is likely his other sons will have mostly/only sons. (not 100% IMO just better than 50%). Well since Wash wanted to know why I was asking about siblings and nieces/nephews, I decided to google my thoughts to see if any reseach had been done on it.
Here is what I found. I think it has some cool thinkings/theorys on baby gender trends.
https://www.ncl.ac.uk/press.office/press.release/item/boy-or-girl-it-s-in-the-father-s-genes
Disclaimer: As I wrote this is just a theory and I don't believe it to be 100%
Re: Wash-- I'm not crazy! lol
I learned a lot while TTC. Men's sperm can have a slight variance off of the 50/50 but no more than 52/48. The very slight difference combined with the right timing, I think can give the illusion of boy heavy or girl heavy. But bottom line, genetics have nothing to do with which sperm gets to the egg first.
I am a proof person --- what research proves that male sperm is no more than 52/48.
I know there is some research backing up the timing of sex with sperm life.
I am trying to remember which book I have that says there can be slight variation, it is the only thing I have read that slightly supports your idea. Other than that one, every other thing says it is straight up 50/50.
Here is one article from a gender selection and fertility clinic that has just about all the information I have seen everywhere else put together.
https://mygenderselection.com/origins-pseudoscience/xx-vs-xy-the-biology-of-gender/