Anyone seen the cover of Elle?

Re: Anyone seen the cover of Elle?

• EcoMama33

  March 2012

  Beautiful, but def photoshopped.

  

  Report0 Reply
• Loading the player...
• WannaBMommy81

  March 2012

  I think I saw it on starcasm.net.  Definitely photoshop... how could you have that big of breasts and no stretchmarks?!?!
  

  Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml

  Report0 Reply
• sparkplug06

  March 2012

  Ambsies:

  I posted the pic earlier on my BMB and said I'm sure they photoshopped the hell out of it.  Everyone seemed to agree.

  But regardless- she looks amazing.

  I liked this pic better:
  

  ETA:  I thought you were talking about the "Demi" pic, I hadn't seen the cover.
  

   

   

  I agree I like this one better. It was for sure photo shopped there is no way she doesn't have any stretch marks.  

  

  Report0 Reply
• The_Jen626

  March 2012

  I have a build similar to JS and I didn't get any stretchmarks with my last pregnancy.  Even on my gigantic boobs. It's purely genetics, some people get stretch marks, and some don't.

  

  Report0 Reply
• ruthymusney member

  March 2012

  sparkplug06:

  Ambsies:

  I posted the pic earlier on my BMB and said I'm sure they photoshopped the hell out of it.  Everyone seemed to agree.

  But regardless- she looks amazing.

  I liked this pic better:
  

  ETA:  I thought you were talking about the "Demi" pic, I hadn't seen the cover.
  

   

   

  I agree I like this one better. It was for sure photo shopped there is no way she doesn't have any stretch marks.  

  Im not saying she doesn't have any, but I gained at LEAST 40 lbs with my first and didn't get any stretch marks. It's not impossible  

  <a href="http://s552.photobucket.com/albums/jj348/RuthyMunsey/?action=view

  Report0 Reply
• ckbolan member

  March 2012

  She was at my doctors office while I was there for my NT scan. She def looks bigger now than she does in these photos. But she still was really pretty pregnant!

  Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml

  Report0 Reply
• eebaehr member

  March 2012

  I always thought she was beautiful, thick or thin, and I love the fact that she's rockin the bump:)

  Report0 Reply
• robotsunlays

  March 2012

  i like this pic

  Report0 Reply
• FrickandFrack member

  March 2012

  Ambsies:

  I posted the pic earlier on my BMB and said I'm sure they photoshopped the hell out of it.  Everyone seemed to agree.

  But regardless- she looks amazing.

  I liked this pic better:
  

  ETA:  I thought you were talking about the "Demi" pic, I hadn't seen the cover.
  

  I think this is such a cute pic.

  Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml

  Report0 Reply
• queenie521 member

  March 2012

  LoisLane23:

  Every single model on every single cover of every single magazine is photoshopped. Yes, Jessica included. Who cares? Why is it ok to photoshop others but not pregnant women? She looks great and so happy.

  I wasn't saying it was good or bad, I was just curious......and maybe a little jealous since my stretch marks get worse and worse with each child. I think she looks fantastic either way and I say good for her for flaunting it all. I've always thought she was beautiful and much more "real" looking then a lot of celebs/models. 

  Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml

  Report0 Reply
• Bubblytoes118 member

  March 2012

  The_Jen626:

  I have a build similar to JS and I didn't get any stretchmarks with my last pregnancy.  Even on my gigantic boobs. It's purely genetics, some people get stretch marks, and some don't.

   

  Same here!  I gained 47 pounds and didn't have any stretch marks.  I carried very similar to JS too. 

  Here comes number 2! EDD 11.8.12

  Report0 Reply
• hailyf

  March 2012

  I am hoping I look that hot 8+ months in!

  Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml

  Report0 Reply
• futuremamabird member

  March 2012

  hailyf:

  I am hoping I look that hot 8+ months in!

  Amen. She's freaking adorable. 
  

  

  Report0 Reply
• IBackBevo member

  March 2012

  I agree that these pictures are beautiful but I think they are photoshopped for way more than just stretch marks.  She is MUCH bigger than that as can be seen from other pictures.  Her arms and legs look small in these pictures and you can tell from other pics that they are not.  Even her face looks much heavier in other pictures.  Regardless, I think she is beautiful but I actually like the fact that in most candid pictures she looks like a real pregnant woman with a little bit of chub going on. Here- not so much. 

  IF DX: DOR & Fragile X pre-mutation carrier
  2011: FSH 13.3 & E 99; AMH 0.54 2nd FSH 6.2 E 40's AFC: 8
  BFP from Clomid/IUI ~ Pre-e and IUGR during pregnancy ~ DS born 9/4/12
  Feb./March 2013: AMH less than 0.16 (undectable) and AFC = 4;
  BFP from supps ~ DS#2 due May 2014
  

  
  May 2014 January Siggy Challenge:
  
  

  Report0 Reply
• tobysnuggles member

  March 2012

  I've see a lot of pics in magazines of her clothed and they photoshopped a lot more then stretch marks here. I was shocked to find out shes only 6 months PG - in normal pics she looks like shes carrying multiples! She's def put on chub so it's a good thing she has this weight watcher deal lined up! In the newest US weekly magazine they had pics of pregnant stars and how far along they were...Jessica looked bigger then all of them no matter what month they were in.
  

  Report0 Reply