Dh and I always said that when we have a boy we will get him circumcised, but I've been doing a little reading about it and I think when DH gets home, I want to talk to him some more about it. So, I'm wondering, those having boys, already have boys, what made you decide to go ahead or not get your LO's circumcised? Have you thought about or talked about it yet? I wasn't aware that the having this procedure done is one of the only main surgeries that they don't use something stronger than a topical cream and its not fully recommeded by the APA.
Re: Those having boys...circumcision?
We decided no. Just un-ncecessary and want to give him the choice (if we have a boy.) Funny story, H isn't cut, but he wanted to cut Bug just cause it's "easier" but then we looked more into it and decided no. My family isn't going to be a fan because of religious reasons, but I take the New Testament's stance on it. To me it comes down to:
I don't want them taking my newborn away from me to cut a part of him off.
Why do it if you don't REALLY care as it is a cosmetic procedure? (If something happens later on down the road and he needs it for health reasons ---very rare--- he would probably get some sort of anesthetic.)
An un.circ'ed penis is NOT difficult to take care of.
It isn't a social issue anymore since only like half of boys his age WILL be circ..
Also, decided that if we did it and he didn't like our decision, sure there are plastic surgeries to get the look, but he wouldn't get the same nerve endings, ect. It's permanent.
If we didn't and he didn't like it, he could get a surgery to correct our "mistake."
This blog helped the decision making process in my case
https://9davids.blogspot.com/2010/11/50-reasons-to-leave-it-alone.html
this exactly.
also, OP, can-o-worms. pretty sure this has been discussed multiple times before, and it always leads to a huge debate. to each her own.
Baby Blog!
If we have a boy, he will be circumcised. There was not a huge debate in our house; my husband said he wanted it done, I said I wanted it done, end of discussion.
As a nurse who currently works for a dermatologist, I cannot tell you how many times we have seen males of all ages come into our office with some sort of infection or irritation on their uncircumcised penis. That's not to say that people who are circ'ed don't have problems down there as well but we see a lot of people who are not that have a problem/rash/infection under that extra foreskin.
I witnessed several circumcisions while working in the maternity ward of a hospital. It is a quick, routine procedure. The baby has some discomfort for the 5 minute procedure. The baby likely will not remember this discomfort. For an adult male who chooses to have this done, it is extremely painful as most surgical centers only use a local anesthetic for the procedure and it takes a lot longer to perform the procedure on an adult versus an infant.
I also have seen patients come into our practice because the circumcision they had during adulthood has caused complications. One male continued to develop infections because the site wouldn't heal properly, causing pain and discomfort for months. Another male had a large amount of scar tissue develop, which then continually developed painful cysts on his penis and had to have each one surgically removed. Many patients state they wish their parents would have done it when they were a baby so they didn't have to deal with issues in adulthood.
This being said, I am not trying to sway someone's decision to circ or not to circ. I am just trying to state the facts presented later in life since so many people are arguing that it's cosmetic and genital mutilation and barbaric. I am not judging anyone who chooses not to circumcise their child and I think that a few too many posters are being far too judgemental towards the people who are choosing to circumcise their sons. To each their own.
You are correct, not every single procedure is quick and painless. But a majority of them are. And I guarantee you if you ask anybody if they remember their circumcision as a newborn, most people will tell you no. I was simply stating that in most cases, it's far easier to have it done as a newborn versus having it done during adulthood. And as parents, we all have the right to request a specific doctor you are comfortable with doing the procedure rather than having a resident do the procedure if you prefer.
If this LO is a boy we will not be circumcising him. The PP pretty much covered our reasoning.
I do think there are reasons to choose to have it done (decreased HIV transmission etc), but I do not think looking the same as daddy or locker room worries are particularly valid reasons to put our future child through a painful procedure. I think as long as parents make an informed decision on the pros/cons and come to an agreement together then that is what they should do.
My husband is circumcised and has no complaints about his sexual stimulation and pleasure. He actually seems quite pleased.
Again, as I stated in my original post, I'm not trying to sway anyone's decision. I was simply giving my opinion and giving some examples of why I was choosing to circ just as some people gave their reasons not to because I saw that some people are kind of being attacked for choosing to circumcise their kid. Again, to each their own.
THIS!
I completely agree. I usually don't take part in the circ discussions for this reason, but I'll pop-in to say this before I step back from it again:
DS is circ'd, and it was not at all a decision taken lightly. It was researched extensively and discussed at length between DH and myself, my OB and our pediatrician. Yes, the less important issues were brought up (like DH is circ'd himself, most babies are in our region, therefore most of his friends will be) but those things were not at all the deciding factors. We did our research and we did what we thought was right for our child.
I appreciate a good discussion/debate, but I do not appreciate being judged for doing what DH and I determined as parents to be the best thing for our child. I do not judge anyone who makes the opposite choice, it upsets me that that respect doesn't usually go both ways.
DH is cut, DS is cut, this one will be as well. It was never really a discusion in our house, when they asked us at the hospital after DS was born we both said yes and that was that. Our pedi performed ours and insurance covered it 100%.
I respect other's choices and will admit that to my knowledge, I've never seen an uncirc'd penis. How's that for a FFFC thrown in?
IDK what I'm having yet but DH and I discussed and THIS for sure. Dh is circumcised and my son will be too.
This.
I had a friend in college who was not circumcised and did it then. His doctor warned him that doing it at a later age is much more painful and inconvenient than having it done at birth. I wouldn't want him to have to go through that if he wanted to change it.
If we have a boy, we are circumcising.
I wouldn't let the opinions of the women on this board interfere w/a decision DH and I have already made together. There are always extremists on both sides that are irrationally loud.
IVF #1 ET 1 d3 embryo 10/30/11 BFP
3 Embryos frozen (1 d5, 2 d6)
DS born 07/29/12
FET #1 ET 1 d5 embryo 02/10/15 BFN
FET #2 1 d6 embryo didn't survive thaw, transferred last d6. CP
Yep. This issue is not one to get on the soapbox for. There are pros and cons for both sides and it's up to the parents to make their own decision. I will say for pure demographic information that we are not going to have it done.
This is mostly how I feel, so I'm letting my husband who I love and trust have most of the say-so in the decision. He wants to have it done. I don't really have a preference either way.
I do believe that because this is such a sensitive subject, and since each opinion is so strong either for or against, that we can't judge or condone someone else for their decision.
I completely see the reasons/research for not having the procedure done, but I also know of the benefits of having it done too. We personally know a friend from high school whose parents left it up to him to decide whether he wanted it done or not, and he did. So they let him have the surgery. It was extremely painful for him and a much longer healing process. He said he wished his parents had had it done for him as a baby. ...but again, that was HIS opinion, and not necessarily everyone's.
my read shelf:
I feel like this could be a very healthy discussion for people actually wanting to hear arguments both for and against to help then with a decision. I do not think it's right to put people down for their opinions on the matter.
That being said, we are still talking about it and have more to read. Right now we're leaning towards having it done. DH is not but his friend had to be when he was 6 and he said it was the worst thing that's ever happened to him. Horrible pain even after the surgery. Not the only reason, but something for us to consider.
Very well said.
EDD 1/31/11 m/c 6/21/11 miss you little circus peanut.
Do we really want a generation of boys/men running around wanting sex MORE b/c it feels better????
Kidding. We haven't made a decision yet, we're looking at all the research we can.
I respect your fervor on this topic, but to play devils advocate I have to say I have yet to meet a circumcised man who doesn't enjoy sex.
We are not having it done. I am not comfortable at all with handing over my newborn to some doctor who will strap him to a table and cut off part of his body with perhaps minimal pain relief.
I've done some research and found NO medical need for having this done, and I am so glad that my DH agrees with me on this!