Hi ladies, I have never posted here but I have a question for you natural mamas! I am pregnant with my third child. I went natural with my second son and loved the experience. The labor was super fast and I was glad I got to check it off the to do list in life. I was planning on going natural with #3 as well.
So plans changed today. I have been monitored the last few weeks for mild preeclampsia. Today I was told they are going to induce me next Tuesday. I'm excited about meeting my baby so soon but definitly nervous about being induced.
I've heard pitocin hurts way worse than natural contractions and I had wanted to avoid it. Any ideas for being induced without pitocin? At what point can they start labor by breaking your water? I was 3cm dialated and 30% effaced at my last appointment. Thanks for any input!
Re: Inducing without pitocin?
I was induced for PIH at 40w with DS, although I was closed and he was +2. I was admitted on a Sunday night and got discharged on a Wednesday afternoon since my blood pressure went down and the proteins in my urine did as well, so obviously my induction didn't work. However, what we did do was Cytotec, Cervadil and the breast pump before going to Pit on the last day (I got maxed out on it). I felt like the Pitocin contractions for me were similar to the ones I got from the breast pump. They were more of a uterine irritability vs. real contractions since I only go to about a 2 by the time I was discharged.
Have you read any Henci Goer books? I actually had that with me during my induction since she covers different methods. I know they normally say to hold off until 7ish cms before having your water broken, but it might be different for an induction. However, it wouldn't be my first choice since I feel like it was one of the reasons I ended up with a c/s since they broke it around 8 cm and DS was in a funky position, etc. I might just be an unlucky one, so my view of it all is different and I know many people have had much success with it.
So anyways, I would ask about doing the breast pump first.
I was induced with Pitocin with both my twin labors. I don't know how it feels like "naturally' so my goal this time is to not be induced if I can help it. I have one labor without pain meds (really intense) and one with an epi. I'm not sure other ways to induce now but Pitocin was the major if not only way 7-9 years ago. They usually just hook you up to IV, monitor you for a little while, start pitocin through your IV, pop your water and let it go from there. I plan on going with another epi, I really enjoyed the experience and it was a relaxing birth, but if I don't get induced I'm not sure I want an epi if I can handle it....I guess we will see.
I had severe preclampsia with my first labor and was very sick. I ended up needing two blood transfusions after the birth due to all the blood lose. Babies were very healthy at 34 weeks so it all ended up being ok. Please monitor headaches and vision issues. Preclampsia can get back very quickly, but I'm sure your DR already told ya all you need to know.
Ok great! This is good news. I think I want to go into my dr. office and meet with a midwife to discuss this stuff. I will ask about this option. The only parts of a "birth plan" I had was that I want mobility and not have to lay in the bed the whole time and I hoped to avoid pitoicn. Oh yeah, and I want the baby on me before they clean her up. I know that seems gross but I've had two babies by now so I know you don't notice it so much in the moment. I want that skin to skin as quickly as possible. Sure hope this can happen with an induction!
I was induced due to PreE with DS. I was put on a very low dose of pit overnight that was gradually upped in hopes of gradually putting me into labor. Because of the mag sulfate that I had to be on, the pit never induced any effective contractions (I actually couldn't feel them at all for the most part) and labor didn't start until several hours later when they broke my water. Luckily, I was already 2-3cm when I went in to be induced, so this was an option.
Even though the water-breaking was really what put me into labor, they kept the pit on when they should have probably turned it off (I think this in hindsight b/c during active labor I definately wasn't able to advocate for myself like this, I just wanted to tune out the world while dealing with contractions). I think the pit pushed my labor forward too quickly, causing a few issues which could have otherwise been avoided.
In hindsight, I would have done this: 1) Foley bulb, until I was 4 cm, in hopes that the pressure would put me into labor. If it didn't then 2) Rupture of membranes. No pit at all unless AROM didn't put me into labor. Of course, AROM has it's own dangers such as cord prolapse (if LO's head is engaged, this is less of a danger) and you're put on the clock, but with the PreE, DS needed to come out pronto, so being on the clock wasn't really an issue in my circumstance.
Of course, your situation might be different, but this is what I did, and what I would have done in hindsight. Best of luck!
BFP#2: EDD 2/11/14, MMC confirmed 7/15/13 (growth stopped at 6 weeks), D&C @ 12 weeks 7/25/13