I know the ultrasounds can sometimes be off by a bit, but I'm about 8 days over my due date and yesterday the tech said the baby is weighing in at 9 lb 13 oz. GULP. Ummmm...wow. I'm scheduled for an induction on Monday (if I don't go this weekend) and the doc had me come in again today to talk thru options. She felt that was a large baby (I'm average height/weight) and that a c-section might have to happen.
I'm going into this very open minded. My "plan" is to go naturally/vaginally, but if any complications arise, I'm open to an epi/c-section. My only concern is that it seems these days they jump the gun on c-sections. I know I'm not a doctor..and I will trust I'm in good hands which I know I am - just wondering if anyone else is going thru the same thing!?
Re: Anyone else having a "big" baby?
I will tell you this much, my cousin had her first daughter a few years ago - she was a peanut - maybe 6.5 lbs and had a TON of complications and almost needed a c-section. She had her second daughter almost a year a go, she was 10lb 6oz and had ZERO complications.
The weight of the baby isn't a good indication of how labor will go, it has more to do with the baby's position, where their arms are, the size of their head, etc.
Not to mention that those weight estimates can be off as much as 25% - and it seems to be more unusual when they're right.