I know this question is a common one, but now that I'm in the boat I thought I would ask my fellow bumpies if they had any answer for me,
At my 16wk appt today my uterus is measuring 19cm, 3cms too large for 16 wks. Dr ordered an ultrasound (I expected to have one done at 20 wks anyway) to make sure everything's ok.
I had an u/s done at 7wks and Dr confirmed my dates I had for LMP were right since the baby was measuring perfect for 7wks. So if my EDD is still the same, why would my uterus be measuring large? Big baby? BTW I have only gained one pound this pregnancy and I still don't have real bump anyone would notice.
Re: Reason for measuring large?
bfp#4 3/19/2014 edd 12/1/2014 please let this be the one!
beta @ 5w0d = 12,026! u/s 4/22/14 @ 8w1d it's twins!
It's probably nothing. Shape or tilt of your uterus, the way the baby is laying...that or your having a litter
Those measurements rely alot on where baby is sitting and what position they're in. I take the u/s dates with a grain of salt. I know they're supposed to be super accurate but I chart and know when I conceived. I could see a few days difference but the tech told me she was measuring two weeks ahead and it's not physically possible for her to be that old.
I didn't think the fundal height measurement was really accurate this early--is that what your OB was measuring?
I wouldn't worry about it at this point--I think an u/s will be much more accurate this early. I don't think my mw started measuring my uterus until 24-28 weeks. I measured a couple of weeks behind my entire pregnancy, and my DD was 8 lbs when she was born.
Measurements are based on averages but our bodies and babies are different, plus things like different position, growth spurts, etc. My LO measured 5d behind for most of 1st tri on u/s. Now with fundal height he measures 2 weeks ahead. That said, I think fundal height is only valid after 24w and it has a margin of error of up to 3 cm.
More Green For Less Green
I'm actually in the same boat--I'll be 14 weeks on Monday, and when I posted about this (my aunt is a former ob/gyn and when she felt my bump she measured and commented and looked confused b/c i was measuring 3 weeks larger) several ladies mentioned the same reasons (fibroids, large baby, fluid, and possibly twins)...i don't have my next appointment till wednesday so i'll find out what she says then...but you'll find out soon enough with the u/s. and several women at work told me that its common to measure large, and they all had normal, single babies even though they thought they were having twins too!
good luck and keep us posted!
DD #1 born 10/21/03
DD #2 born 2/8/06
DS no hb 11/17/10 at 21w1d, d&e 11/24,demise due to fetal hydrops, from congestive heart failure, probably caused by structural malformation
Our Rango....BFP 2/6/11...hb on 2/23...perfectly healthy, but no hb on 6/9/11 d & e 6/15/2011
Rango's Blog