Babies: 9 - 12 Months

You do know that Mum-Mums are full of sugar...right?

It's the second thing on the ingredients list.

My friend has mentionned that her daughter is over-weight to me a few times now. She's 25lbs at 1 year old. My son is two and rather under-weight at about the same weight.

But her little girl is a total carb and sugar junkie. I just don't have the heart to tell her.

Please, please, learn the "code" words for types of sugar and know that ingredients are listed from highest to lowest quantities. sigh

«1

Re: You do know that Mum-Mums are full of sugar...right?

  • Wait.  You're saying 25lbs at a year is overweight?  I guess by those standards Henry is obese. haha
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Pregnancy Ticker
  • Loading the player...
  • imageAMYfromKY:
    Wait.  You're saying 25lbs at a year is overweight?  I guess by those standards Henry is obese. haha

    DS is right there with your Henry ;)

  • i was thinking the same thing 25lbs at 1 doesnt seem to be obese to me but who knows
  • Like "organic evaporated cane juice"??

    lol

    If sugar (of any wording) is in the top 5 ingredients I think about the product for quite some time before purchasing.

     

  • really.  25 pounds is overweight?

     

    :::sigh:::

     

    go away.

    Rylee - 3.28.08
    Malakai - 8.3.09
    Ezra - 12.1.11 ASD
  • She was 6 lbs at birth, so I guess the "triple your birth-weight" in the first year thing...?

    I didn't think it was too bad either.

  • Its not like these kids are only eating Mum-Mums all day long...

    and my kids are almost one and are just approaching 17 and 18 pounds and are in the bottom 5th percentiles for weight... have been eating Mum-Mums since they were 7 months old... I guess we should put them on a diet because they are going to get fat...

    imageAlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
  • imageCyrbia:

    She was 6 lbs at birth, so I guess the "triple your birth-weight" in the first year thing...?

    I didn't think it was too bad either.

    So was my girl... she has ALWAYS been at the 95% for weight... SOMEONE has to be there... doesn't mean they are obese OR overweight.

    Rylee - 3.28.08
    Malakai - 8.3.09
    Ezra - 12.1.11 ASD
  • Well then, my 20lb 6 month old is a tank! Confused

    I don't think anyone here has their child on a Mum Mum regimen. A snack here and there is not going to cause an issue...not that a 25lb 1 year old is an issue.

  • imageCyrbia:

    She was 6 lbs at birth, so I guess the "triple your birth-weight" in the first year thing...?

    I didn't think it was too bad either.

    This is only if your LO was at an average birthweight. My LO was just under 5 lbs, and now he's pushing 20. He's DEFINITELY not obese.

    Pregnancy Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker imageimage
  • I think maybe some of you are missing the point.  The point is sugar is not good for your kids.  Read the ingredients - if sugar is in the first 5 ingredients - there is too much.  Doesn't anyone watch Dr Oz?
    AlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers Image and video hosting by TinyPic
  • imageivs112:

    Well then, my 20lb 6 month old is a tank! Confused

    I don't think anyone here has their child on a Mum Mum regimen. A snack here and there is not going to cause an issue...not that a 25lb 1 year old is an issue.

    this exactly! height has a huge factor in this whole conversation as well. 

    Lilypie Fourth Birthday tickers Lilypie Third Birthday tickers Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • imagemadameladauphine:
    I think maybe some of you are missing the point.  The point is sugar is not good for your kids.  Read the ingredients - if sugar is in the first 5 ingredients - there is too much.  Doesn't anyone watch Dr Oz?

     

    well if teevee says it then it must be true! 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagemadameladauphine:
    I think maybe some of you are missing the point.  The point is sugar is not good for your kids.  Read the ingredients - if sugar is in the first 5 ingredients - there is too much.  Doesn't anyone watch Dr Oz?

    I think we all get the point, but are a little pissed that the OP seems to think that a 25 pounds one year old is overweight.

    Rylee - 3.28.08
    Malakai - 8.3.09
    Ezra - 12.1.11 ASD
  • I get your point and agree with you...except that like pp said, I doubt most moms are idiotic enough to feed their LOs Mums and Puffs all day long and count them as meals...they are just snacks and it isn't going to hurt to offer them occasionally. 
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Pregnancy Ticker
  • Are you saying that I shouldn't be giving DS a basket full of Peeps for Easter??? Crap. Darn sugar code words. Stick out tongue

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagemadameladauphine:
    I think maybe some of you are missing the point.  The point is sugar is not good for your kids.  Read the ingredients - if sugar is in the first 5 ingredients - there is too much.  Doesn't anyone watch Dr Oz?

    THANK YOU!

    I DIDN'T say it, my friend did...ugh. And Mum-Mums are her "daily" snack. So are those gerber candies "fruits"

    Anyhow, sugar reduces your bodies ability to fight infection, it causes you to "crash" after a sugar "high" and it also can contribute to diabetes and more.

  • Does that mean that I shouldn't give DS a basket full of Peeps for Easter??? Crap. Darn sugar code words Stick out tongue

    Edit: Sorry for the double post - "the server was busy" got me.

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageEmmSquared:

    imagemadameladauphine:
    I think maybe some of you are missing the point.  The point is sugar is not good for your kids.  Read the ingredients - if sugar is in the first 5 ingredients - there is too much.  Doesn't anyone watch Dr Oz?

     

    well if teevee says it then it must be true! 

    I was just using him as a reference. I'm pretty sure you could find many other Doctors that would say the same thing.  Should I start linking reputable websites/quoting books to make my point instead? 

    AlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers Image and video hosting by TinyPic
  • i think that sugar is that high on the list b/c they can't really list air as an ingredient-  each one is a whopping 7.5 calories-  i doubt they are making any kid obese.

    and my 20 lb 9 month old is 40th percentile for weight-  interesting

    EDD with #4  01-20-14
    Proud mama to a boys-  6/17/09 - a girl 2/23/11- and a boy 8/20/12

  • I didn't know WTF a mum mum was so I looked it up.  1 serving has 0.5gm of sugar, not exactly a lot.  You can eat 10 of them and only have 5 gm of sugar.  A banana has 21 gms.
  • Mum-mums are not full of sugar.

    They have .5g of sugar per serving (and a serving is 2 mum-mums). Yes, it's second on the ingredient list, but there are only 4 ingredients in it. Mostly it's just rice. So there could be one teaspoon of sugar and one half teaspoon of salt in five pounds of rice and the ingredients would say 'rice, sugar, salt.'

    [For reference, one of those little sugar packets at restaurants has 4 grams of sugar (15 calories) in it. So each mum-mum has 1/16th of a sugar packet--and about 1 calorie from sugar.]

    Obviously no one should be feeding their kid only mum-mums but to say they are full of sugar is ridiculous. As is saying that a 25lb one year old is overweight (whoever said it).

    Sigh.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Good evening everyone! I agree with PP. Mum Mums aren't as bad as other "baby" foods. I think Gerber puffs are ridiculously sweet and most of those yogurt drops have sugar. The fact is most foods aren't going to be entirely sugar free, the natural sugar in food is still present. 

     

    DS#1~ 6/8/09 DS#2~ 5/12/11
  • imagemadameladauphine:
    imageEmmSquared:

    imagemadameladauphine:
    I think maybe some of you are missing the point.  The point is sugar is not good for your kids.  Read the ingredients - if sugar is in the first 5 ingredients - there is too much.  Doesn't anyone watch Dr Oz?

     

    well if teevee says it then it must be true! 

    I was just using him as a reference. I'm pretty sure you could find many other Doctors that would say the same thing.  Should I start linking reputable websites/quoting books to make my point instead? 

    I would prefer peer-reviewed studies published in reputable journals but whatevs. J/K! Seriously, though- sone babies are just big. O is pushing 25 lbs now (at least) and he doesn't eat sugar-loaded food. Breastmilk and veggies, yo, and fruit and some cereal but less of those things.
  • Give me a break.  =/  I doubt Mum mums are a problem unless she's letting the kid eat a whole box at a time.
  • imagemadameladauphine:
    I think maybe some of you are missing the point.  The point is sugar is not good for your kids.  Read the ingredients - if sugar is in the first 5 ingredients - there is too much.  Doesn't anyone watch Dr Oz?

    First, wth, babies are not overweight at ONE.  Whoever thinks that has serious issues.

    Second:

    Ingredients are listed as a percentage. 

    A food might be 99.9% rice flour, and 0.05% sugar, 0.03% salt, and 0.02% whey  (I am not bothering with the math, as PP's have shown that a banana has way more sugar than a MumMum, I am just pointing out the faulting reasoning behind the crappy way the US lists food ingredients)

    So, Sugar can be the second ingredient and be a minuscule part of the actual food item.

    Lilypie First Birthday tickers Lilypie Fourth Birthday tickers
  • 25lbs at 1 year is NOT overweight! Most babies double their weight at 6 months and triple at a year. If DD tripes at a year she will be close to 25lbs....and she is tiny! At her 9 month appt she weight 17lbs.

    Your tone was rather condescending. We all know "code" words, and that ingredients are listed from highest to lowest. A little bit of sugar (the tiny amount in mum mums) is not going to make a baby obese.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Exactly.  There is 0.25g of sugar in a single Mum-mum.  There's more sugar in just about everything else that I feed her (including her veggies), than there is in Mum-mums.
  • rice crackers is not the reason that our nation/world is overweight.

     

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • DDs carrots have more sugar per serving and its not even listed as an ingredient.

    Get your head out of your ass and learn to process information, kthx.

  • i am beating a dead horse, but shouldn't everyone know that sugar is not the culprit, it's the amount of calories consumed versus calories burned that makes someone overweight?!? since ds weighs 22 pounds at almost 9 months, then he's bound to be obese by cyrbia's standards at a year. (biggest eyeroll in the universe)
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageMrs.Carlybella:

    i think that sugar is that high on the list b/c they can't really list air as an ingredient-  each one is a whopping 7.5 calories-  i doubt they are making any kid obese.

    and my 20 lb 9 month old is 40th percentile for weight-  interesting

    Yeah, I was going to say, obviously sugar is in the top 5 ingredients, there is only 3 ingredients in them.  A mom would be an idiot to think mum mums were a meal, and just because its placed as the second ingredient (and hey, its the second to last ingredient too!) doesnt mean its "full" of sugar.

    And the OP did make it sound like she felt the 25lb kid at a year was obese considering she used that child as her example of a fat child to support her PSA.

  • screw mum mums ... my DD ate two small chocolate chip cookies at a fancy restaurant we went to over the weekend .... and she is only 17 lbs at 11 months .... i must be a horrible mommy to have let her have them!!

    seriously people - a little sugary treat here and there won't do any harm! 

  • imageluckyNJ:
    Mum-mums are not full of sugar.

    They have .5g of sugar per serving (and a serving is 2 mum-mums). Yes, it's second on the ingredient list, but there are only 4 ingredients in it. Mostly it's just rice. So there could be one teaspoon of sugar and one half teaspoon of salt in five pounds of rice and the ingredients would say 'rice, sugar, salt.'

    [For reference, one of those little sugar packets at restaurants has 4 grams of sugar (15 calories) in it. So each mum-mum has 1/16th of a sugar packet--and about 1 calorie from sugar.]

    Obviously no one should be feeding their kid only mum-mums but to say they are full of sugar is ridiculous. As is saying that a 25lb one year old is overweight (whoever said it).

    Sigh.

    This.

    And according to the package I have of organic rice cereal. There is the same amount of sugar in 2T of the cereal as there is in 2 MumMums.

    Maybe Dr.Oz should tell people to read the entire package!

  • I'm totally out of the loop... who's dr. oz?
    Me 38, DH 34 Missed M/C 10/08 at 10 weeks DD born 8/09, TTC#2 since Jan 2011 Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagemadameladauphine:
    I think maybe some of you are missing the point.  The point is sugar is not good for your kids.  Read the ingredients - if sugar is in the first 5 ingredients - there is too much.  Doesn't anyone watch Dr Oz?

    image

  • this entire thread is ridiculous.

     

  • I know kids that only eat sugar and crap and are UNDERweight.  They are extremely unhealthy but no one seems that concerned because they appear to be a "normal" weight.

    So, just because a child is overweight doesn't mean they are eating too much sugar - or any sugar for that matter.  They may just eat a lot of healthy food.  Or they may just be big kids that will grow into their bodies.

  • Jo was 25 lbs at 6 months on nothing but breastmilk.

    I lead to her obesity and should be ashamed. Clearly there were mum mums in my tatas. 

    image Josephine is 4.
  • imageluckyNJ:
    Mum-mums are not full of sugar.

    They have .5g of sugar per serving (and a serving is 2 mum-mums). Yes, it's second on the ingredient list, but there are only 4 ingredients in it. Mostly it's just rice. So there could be one teaspoon of sugar and one half teaspoon of salt in five pounds of rice and the ingredients would say 'rice, sugar, salt.'

    [For reference, one of those little sugar packets at restaurants has 4 grams of sugar (15 calories) in it. So each mum-mum has 1/16th of a sugar packet--and about 1 calorie from sugar.]

    Obviously no one should be feeding their kid only mum-mums but to say they are full of sugar is ridiculous. As is saying that a 25lb one year old is overweight (whoever said it).

    Sigh.

    You rock. :)

    fraternal twin boys born january 2009
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"