Seriously why do all the boy underwear have all the cool characters on them? We are going to attempt potty training this summer and my daughter has no clue/interest in princesses/Dora/Tangled/Minnie. However she loves all things Thomas/Mickey/Finding Nemo and Monsters Inc. But those characters are only on the boys' underwear. WTF?
Re: Underwear for toddler girls?
I say let her wear boy underwear. Boy's briefs fit better anyway. Yay for no wedgies!!
ETA: FTR, I wore mens briefs in late high school/early college. I love them. In fact this makes me want to buy some to wear to bed at night. They are so comfy.
I am thinking of going the no character route too but I think she would enjoy the character underwear betterat least for training purposes.
bfp#4 3/19/2014 edd 12/1/2014 please let this be the one!
beta @ 5w0d = 12,026! u/s 4/22/14 @ 8w1d it's twins!
My DD2 wears the boy undies for that very reason. She loves Monsters Inc., Toy Story and Jake & the Neverland Pirates, and they're all considered "boy" patterns apparently.
Plus the boy ones are better constructed, IMO, than the toddler girl character undies -- the elastic is covered better and the fabric is thicker.
We have a bunch of nice non-character undies from Old Navy & Gap, but for that initial motivation piece of "you don't want Jake to get wet, right?", we opted for her favorite characters, "boy" or not.
DD1, 1/5/2008 ~~~ DD2, 3/17/2010
"We like nothing better than buffing our Zygoma. And imagining a horny time traveling long overcoat purple scarf wearing super sleuth nordic legend fuck fantasy. Get to work on that, internet." Benedict Cumberbatch
<a href
Cant do clicky but here is some girls Finding Nemo:
https://www.pottytrainingconcepts.com/Nemo-Underwear-Girl.html