So the other day we went out to a family dinner and we gave my lo a lemon slice to suck on, she didn't eat it! and the faces she made were cute. My husband took a video and posted it to facebook. The next day his dad calls and says she shouldn't have had the lemon, and that we are being irresponsible, and are nothing like my husbands cousin, who is very over cautious with what they eat, but they have a lot of food allergies on their dads side. My husbands food allergies only consist of shrimp, which we figured out I can't eat them and bf her, she gets a rash. Am I wrong to let her suck on lemons and oranges. I looked it up before i gave them to her, and it said if it was to early, she would get a rash around her mouth, which she doesn't have, and I haven't given her actual chunks of oranges yet, but her favorite baby food is the orange and banana medley! I don't know, I guess it made me question what I do with her and am i doing a lot of it right! I try to figure out what she can have before I give it to her.
Re: Lemons....
Everyone has an opinion. A little taste of citrus won't damage your kid. If you weren't force feeding it to your baby, then presumably your baby has the option of discarding it if she didn't like it.
This is exactly why we do BLW. I prefer the idea of trusting my babies cues as to whether she likes something or not (within reason, of course), and not relying on arbitrary assessments of when babies are ready. It's funny that even for babies who are deemed healthy and have no allergies the family, different pediatricians will offer vastly different opinions on when they can have certain foods.
If you love your baby and doing your best to make good choices for her, then everyone else's opinion (pediatrician aside), is irrelevant.
If the baby is ok, I'm sure your lo will be just fine. People get crazy. Just say "oh thanks! I never thought of that!" And press on: