my friend is having a new baby girl when her son will be 18 months. I personally couldnt do it.. i have a 3 yr old and am just now ready to start trying.. .. was it really really hard in the beginning and/ or is it harder when they are both toddlers running around? thanks
Re: 18 months apart? how hard will it really be?
My two are 14 months apart. The hardest thing is just that they don't always nap at the same time, so we are stuck in the house a lot more than if I just had 1 toddler.
It's really not as hard as people say. I like it. We actually were trying for #3, but miscarried that pregnancy. If it was successful, it would've been 15 months younger than DS (3 kids under 2.5 yrs). I was so excited!
ETA: DS isn't walking yet, and is still a baby so I can't comment on the '2 toddlers running around'.
Mine are 15 months apart - and DS did just fine with DD in the beginning. Was I busy? Yes, but DD was a great baby, DS was nice to her, and we got along just fine. Now that I have a 2.5 year old and a 16 month old? Hands down 10x harder than the newborn phase for me. DS is in the middle of the terrible 2's, DD is walking around with no sense of danger, and is in the middle of the food throwing stage.
Don't get me wrong, we have fun - they play together, and it is great watching their personalities come out. But it is hard!!
It's really going to depend on the temperaments of the baby/toddler.
I didnt have that hard a time with 2 kids 12 months apart, and now they are starting to interact and play together, life is even easier.
My youngest isnt fully mobile yet (crawling/cruising/standing, but not yet walking) but it hasnt gotten that much more difficult due to that. I wear my youngest in a carrier a lot, so I will continue to do that so I will only have 1 to chase in public places.
Meh, I don't think that there is a "perfect" time honestly. It is always challenging to introduce a new baby into the mix. I think the only reason people tend to think it is easier when the babies have a bigger gap is because the older one tends to be in preschool or school for a good chunk of the day. But in terms with the transition for the kids involved, I actually think smaller age gaps are easier.
My DS and nephew were born one day apart. My DD and my older nephew are 2 years apart. So when we had our babies my DD was 16 months and adjusting to her new brother and my nephew was almost 3.5 and adjusting to his new brother. My 3.5 year old nephew had a MUCH harder time than my 16 month old daughter. And now that my DD is a little over 2 and my son is 10 months, they have a lot more in common than my 4 year old nephew and his 10 month old brother.
So..... I guess I feel like it is a personal family decision and there isn't any "right" way. There is actually no good research that indicates any "best" age gap for kids.
And please tell me that you haven't given her the "I could never do that..." line. I hate that line (I hear it all the time right now with my kids and deployed husband) and find it to be incredibly rude.
Married 6/28/03
Kate ~ 7/3/09 *** Connor ~ 11/11/10
4 miscarriages: 2007, 2009, 2013, 2014
*~*~*~*~*
No more TTC for us. We are done, and at peace, as a family of 4.
"Suffering has been stronger than all other teaching, and has taught me to understand what your heart used to be. I have been bent and broken, but – I hope – into a better shape.” — Charles Dickens
Our family blog
Our family blog
I've been pretty lucky in that both girls sleep pretty well. For the most part, they tend to nap at the same time every afternoon so I get some free time to myself.
Regardless of the spacing between children, there will be benefits and setbacks. You just learn to deal with it.