Need an opinion!

MrsADE

What do you think about Rubyann Elizabeth?

We want to combine family names: Ruby, Mary Ann and Elizabeth.

We like it but want an very unbiased opinion. Thanks!

dairygirl19

Eh. It's all right. I don't like combined names though. Esp. Ruby. It's so pretty on it's own.

Ruby Elizabeth is on our list so I LOVE it.

I'd go with 2 mnames before I'd start combining first names.

Can you just go with Eliza as mn...it's somewhat combining Elizabeth and Ann.

FemmeNat01

I think Ruby Elizabeth would be much better or Elizabeth Ruby Ann.

magsugar13

FemmeFataleNat01:

I think Ruby Elizabeth would be much better or Elizabeth Ruby Ann.

this

BlueRidge8

FemmeFataleNat01:

I think Ruby Elizabeth would be much better or Elizabeth Ruby Ann.

This.

And I don't think Rubyann works phonetically. I think that might be properly pronounced "Ru-baya-n" 

jsillyfun

If you are really set on it, I'd spell it Ruby Ann Elizabeth. My grandma is Mary Jane (goes by both names as a fn) and I think it looks much better separated.

Baby*Kisses

Rubyann almost makes me think of Rueben.... i agree with giving 2 middle names instead of smooshing them like that. Ruby Elizabeth Ann is cute i think

Puppylove*85

I would break it out as Ruby Ann Elizabeth.  Personally, I would use Ruby as the first name with Ann and Elizabeth as middle names.

alliejo725

I'm with PP----space it out, and make it either a double FN (Ruby Ann) or a FN with two MNs (Ruby Ann Elizabeth). I agree that Rubyann does not look like "Ruby Ann," but more like "rew-by-un" or Rueben.

mbritto4

jsillyfun:

If you are really set on it, I'd spell it Ruby Ann Elizabeth.

This.  Don't combine names. 

KeriMichaelMarie

I think that is a lot of names.

I'd try to keep it more simple. 

abell77

I would just do Ruby Elizabeth.  Rubyann is just a bit too much to me and she would probably end up being called just Ruby anyway.  Ruby Elizabeth is nice.

angeliegrace

Ruby Elizabeth..