My friend had "twins" that are two weeks apart. She got pregnant, ovulated a second time and got pregnant 2 weeks later. It's very rare but can certainly happen. Her babies were born at the same time. Emery is just older than Sammie by 2 weeks.
My friend had "twins" that are two weeks apart. She got pregnant, ovulated a second time and got pregnant 2 weeks later. It's very rare but can certainly happen. Her babies were born at the same time. Emery is just older than Sammie by 2 weeks.
If they were born at the same time, aren't they the same age, regardless of what happened in utero?
Mom's of preemies feel free to educate me on adjusted age, I don't know that much about it. But this seems weird.
My friend had "twins" that are two weeks apart. She got pregnant, ovulated a second time and got pregnant 2 weeks later. It's very rare but can certainly happen. Her babies were born at the same time. Emery is just older than Sammie by 2 weeks.
If they were born at the same time, aren't they the same age, regardless of what happened in utero?
Mom's of preemies feel free to educate me on adjusted age, I don't know that much about it. But this seems weird.
They have the same birthday so technically they are the same age. There were previous posters (I'm sure teasingly) saying that they'd have to give birth 2 weeks later. I'm just stating that even though they were conceived 2 weeks apart their birth would be on the same day.
She meant the ultrasound from when the single fetus was younger vs. older.
GAVEL.
Yeah that's how I read it.
The first time and every time after.
If you read all the pp's comments (including the one with the link to a previous discussion about her babies being two weeks apart), you would know that the pp retracted her comments & GAVEL. TYVM.
My friend had "twins" that are two weeks apart. She got pregnant, ovulated a second time and got pregnant 2 weeks later. It's very rare but can certainly happen. Her babies were born at the same time. Emery is just older than Sammie by 2 weeks.
If they were born at the same time, aren't they the same age, regardless of what happened in utero?
Mom's of preemies feel free to educate me on adjusted age, I don't know that much about it. But this seems weird.
They have the same birthday so technically they are the same age. There were previous posters (I'm sure teasingly) saying that they'd have to give birth 2 weeks later. I'm just stating that even though they were conceived 2 weeks apart their birth would be on the same day.
My friend had "twins" that are two weeks apart. She got pregnant, ovulated a second time and got pregnant 2 weeks later. It's very rare but can certainly happen. Her babies were born at the same time. Emery is just older than Sammie by 2 weeks.
If they were born at the same time, aren't they the same age, regardless of what happened in utero?
Mom's of preemies feel free to educate me on adjusted age, I don't know that much about it. But this seems weird.
They have the same birthday so technically they are the same age. There were previous posters (I'm sure teasingly) saying that they'd have to give birth 2 weeks later. I'm just stating that even though they were conceived 2 weeks apart their birth would be on the same day.
Actually GAVEL was a joke. After all the people weighing in and going back and forth. So i gave my opinion, then hit the GAVEL to end the discussion.
I thought the fact that I was wrong in the end made it funnier.
I'm sorry you didn't get it. Not having a sense of humour must be hard.
I love my sense of humour. I'm sure if I posted on 1st Tri regularly and knew "you" then I would have seen the sarcasm. But since I don't know the 1st Tri regulars, I thought you were seriously using "GAVEL" in the sense of "the conversation is now over, no more posting". I was wrong. Now I get the joke.
Seeing as how I bought a 36-pack of condoms with spermicide today, I don't expect to be here again any time soon, so I will mosey on back to 12-24.
Um, yeah. The Bump be too crazy for pics of my kid.
I'm confused by the other link where she talks about the twins sharing the same sac. If these twins are in the same sac, then that would indicate identical twins. If her babies are identical, then they weren't conceived two weeks apart. Plus, it sounds like from the other thread, the doctor never said they were conceived separately. I think she's assuming they were to ease her mind about the big discrepancy in gestational age.
I'm confused by the other link where she talks about the twins sharing the same sac. If these twins are in the same sac, then that would indicate identical twins. If her babies are identical, then they weren't conceived two weeks apart. Plus, it sounds like from the other thread, the doctor never said they were conceived separately. I think she's assuming they were to ease her mind about the big discrepancy in gestational age.
I'm confused by the other link where she talks about the twins sharing the same sac. If these twins are in the same sac, then that would indicate identical twins. If her babies are identical, then they weren't conceived two weeks apart. Plus, it sounds like from the other thread, the doctor never said they were conceived separately. I think she's assuming they were to ease her mind about the big discrepancy in gestational age.
no she'd started with 1 baby and 2 weeks later got pg with the identical twins - but lost one. So babies that are left are supposedly different gestational ages.
My friend had "twins" that are two weeks apart. She got pregnant, ovulated a second time and got pregnant 2 weeks later. It's very rare but can certainly happen. Her babies were born at the same time. Emery is just older than Sammie by 2 weeks.
If they were born at the same time, aren't they the same age, regardless of what happened in utero?
Mom's of preemies feel free to educate me on adjusted age, I don't know that much about it. But this seems weird.
They have the same birthday so technically they are the same age. There were previous posters (I'm sure teasingly) saying that they'd have to give birth 2 weeks later. I'm just stating that even though they were conceived 2 weeks apart their birth would be on the same day.
Also, maybe she means that the babies are measuring at different weeks. I know that twins that are conceived at the same time can measure differently. Perhaps one twin is just two weeks behind in size.
Geez, ladies. Give her a break.
This is the way I took it, but I don't think the OP understood why they were different in size.
Re: what weeks are the critical time in development for the fetus?
Thank you Patty, you always know where to look for the background on this stuff.
:giggles:
Double giggle.
Interesting indeed.
Remembering Evelyn and raising Bailey
Evelyn Born at 24wks 6days on May 22, 2010 due to pre-e Passed away May 25, 2010
BFP# 2 Delivered 6wks early due to preeclampsia
Haha, you think it hurt the first time....2 weeks later? I think I would die.
If they were born at the same time, aren't they the same age, regardless of what happened in utero?
Mom's of preemies feel free to educate me on adjusted age, I don't know that much about it. But this seems weird.
They have the same birthday so technically they are the same age. There were previous posters (I'm sure teasingly) saying that they'd have to give birth 2 weeks later. I'm just stating that even though they were conceived 2 weeks apart their birth would be on the same day.
Yeah that's how I read it.
The first time and every time after.
If you read all the pp's comments (including the one with the link to a previous discussion about her babies being two weeks apart), you would know that the pp retracted her comments & GAVEL. TYVM.
Trevor Calvin 12.10.07 7:26pm 7lbs2.5oz 19.75in
Emerson Claire 07.07.11 11:34am 7lbs7oz 20.5 in
I'm not judging anyone for what her doctor told her.
But what the hell is the GAVEL for? Is this a 1st Tri thing? Why is always caps? Is fish/crab an AE?
This thread holds such promise and mystery for me.
I don't think it is what her doctor said, I think it is what she assumed.
GAVEL would be her punctuating a sentence, as in, end of story. It isn't a 1st tri thing, I think she just assumed everyone would figure it out.
She is not an AE.
Yeah, that's maybe one of the most asinine things I've ever seen on here.
Then you don't spend very much time on here.
Actually GAVEL was a joke. After all the people weighing in and going back and forth. So i gave my opinion, then hit the GAVEL to end the discussion.
I thought the fact that I was wrong in the end made it funnier.
I'm sorry you didn't get it. Not having a sense of humour must be hard.
For real.
And which part is asinine? The about the girl/doctor or the fact that you didn't get what Sam said was a joke? I am also lost now.
why, because you didn't get it?
Thing 2 = May 2009, Stillborn 33weeks 4lbs 9oz 18in
Thing 3 = October 2010, 27weeks 4days 2lbs 4oz 14.25in
I'm confused. Did I miss a joke?
I love my sense of humour. I'm sure if I posted on 1st Tri regularly and knew "you" then I would have seen the sarcasm. But since I don't know the 1st Tri regulars, I thought you were seriously using "GAVEL" in the sense of "the conversation is now over, no more posting". I was wrong. Now I get the joke.
Seeing as how I bought a 36-pack of condoms with spermicide today, I don't expect to be here again any time soon, so I will mosey on back to 12-24.
She says she had triplets initially.
you know it is possible to have two uteruses. There was just a woman this year that was pregnant in both.
It is rare but not impossible.
no she'd started with 1 baby and 2 weeks later got pg with the identical twins - but lost one. So babies that are left are supposedly different gestational ages.
TTC#1 Chart
TTC#2 Chart
IUI #1 - #4 (repronex trigger) = BFN
IUI#5 on 10/28/2008 ** BFP 11/10/08 ** EDD 07/21/09 *** It's a GIRL (07/14/09)
med/treatment free BFP 06/28/10. EDD 03/05/11 *** GIRL #2 (02/23/11)
beta#1 @ 17dpo = 1296 .... beta#2 @ 19dpo = 3034
it's the Bug and Baby Belle!
Yes, yes you did
This is the way I took it, but I don't think the OP understood why they were different in size.
::stumbles into post::
::wanders out, very confused::