I have a friend with a LO who is about 8 months old. She was telling me that her DD has started lunging for cords (power, usb, etc) so she has started telling her "NO" in a stern voice.
Is this an effective strategy for a baby? I have no idea since my LO is younger, and don't really know what I would do when Monk is that age.
For me, currently, I just try and re-direct by taking away what I don't want him to have and replacing it with his toys and rewarding good behavior (saying "good job", "Yay" etc always makes him smile).
Thoughts?
Re: Lets discuss telling a baby "no"
We tell her no, and redirect her attention, or move her away from whatever she is getting into. Not necessarily in a stern voice, but more a "No Madalyn, you cannot eat the dog's food/play in the trash can/lick the toilet"
However, right now, she thinks "no" is HILARIOUS.
Yeah I see that as a backfire.
Also, lick the toilet? Really?
So I'm in the camp that for REAL safety issues (like cords and things) it's a parent's responsibility to get rid of as MUCH as possible, then teach your child the limit as soon as possible.
Personally, my daughter was so stunned the first time I said NO! to her (when she bit me nursing at 8 months) that she NEVER did it again. But... she's always been a verbal child, and I've always been able to use words to teach her. always.
I have a feeling my son is not going to be the same way. He's 6 months, and is MUCH more physical than my DD, I think he's going to end up needing a lot more physical intervention in the form of redirection, and possibly a handswat for REALLY dangerous situations (not a spanking or a slap, just a little swat on his fingertips with a verbal NO! if he attempts to touch something like a hot stove).
I'm a big believer in multiple intelligence theory, and that different kids need instruction in different forms. If your friend's daughter is verbal, then NO! should do the trick. If not, then your friend will need to find a new way of teaching her daughter safety.
We are dealing with this right now with our almost one year old. I think ?no? just comes out naturally for me and I would love to stop this habit. I try to redirect his attention, but sometimes that just doesn?t work. I know in the past when we have said ?no? to DS, he would laugh at us, but just recently when we have said it he starts to stick out that lower lip of his and he gets his feelings hurt?it just breaks my heart. I would love to hear what other parents are doing in this situation.
Same, except I don't know about her obeying REALLY well. She's very good at stopping in her tracks, but then she usually gets this sneaky smile and defiantly touches it slowly. Luckily, the process is drawn out enough to give me time to get to her before she actually touches anything nasty. (It's always the toilets. WHY, Isis, WHY.)
I read in WTE:1st year that by 9 months your baby should know what NO means but will not necessarily obey it. I've tried saying NO to her but obviously she doesn't really react to it, and i won't say it in a really mean voice b/c i'm not comfortable with that at this point.
So do I know if it works? no. Do I expect it to work? Not really. But someday she'll know what NO means. So I do like you do and redirect her to something else.
LOL, luckily when I forget to shut the bathroom door Ro just plays with the scale... so far.
Also wanted to add that we explain why when we re-direct. And after he does stop in his tracks & we praise him we tell him to come into a different area or go pick him up and re-direct him.
Me too, good point.
that was me being sarcastic. And it's really just us talking to her while redirecting/removing her from the situation. I don't really think telling her "no" is going to get her anywhere at this age. Does that make sense? I don't feel i'm explaining myself well.
We do all of this. Problem is that ds now looks at us when we say no and tells us yes. Crazy kid.
This. I get weekly Infancy updates from my hospital (like the weekly pregnancy updates) and this is exacly what they said.
I guess this is my real question. I am not sure a baby can understand "no". Maybe after a while they can associate "no" with Mommy/Daddy being mad. IDK. My only experience with kids is with mine, so I don't know how much the older ones can understand.
HEHE. I was just kidding. I think kids are funny - they all go through that stage of doing gross stuff. MJ you always make sense
Same with us. Except now Willis is at the age that he is starting to understand "No".
Printing this off to show my husband. Thanks Kit
I have a friend who instead of saying "no", makes the "ehhh" sound in a stern way. This way the infant/toddler isn't always hearing the word "no" but gets the point that they are doing something they aren't supposed to be.
I have a feeling I'm just going to be a "no" mom.
One of the baby books say that when you say no, keep your sentences short at this age. Ex: "No, don't touch. No, don't pull. No, don't bite."
Just saying "no" is pretty pointless, IMO. The child has no idea what he's being told no about. Cords? Lunging? That spot particularly? I think something like "cords are dangerous, we don't touch those" is much better, and a loud "no" to get their attention if there's immediate danger (like an attempt to chew on said cord) followed by redirection and explanation.
SIL/BIL tend to just scream "NO" at their daughter when she's doing something she's not supposed to, like go behind the TV stand. Never once have I seen them go and get her, and say "no, we don't go back there, it's not safe for little girls" (or whatever.) They just scream and scream and eventually go and grab her and put her in time-out (which is a whole 'nother ball of stupid at her age.) It doesn't work, yet somehow it always seems to come back to her being a naughty baby rather than a totally clueless one.
Mes Petit Choux
I can't go back to yesterday - because I was a different person then. ~ Alice
Moses has started doing that too. It's driving me nuts. If he's touching something he shouldn't touch, I either say "Let go" or "Give me that, please". I think that's more positive than "No!" Then I redirect. Obviously he doesn't know what "let go" means, but he will eventually get it.
If he's grabbing my hair or pinching me or something I say "that hurts" instead of "no." It's important to try to limit the use of the words "No" and "Don't" with children.
A simple "No" and redirection can be understood a lot earlier than one would think.
Adding "mommy doesn't want you to do __ because ____ " is way too complicated, and is way to confusing to teach a LO the meaning of no.