Sorry to bring up a sensitive subject...I know there's already a lot written about this out there. I just wanted to share why we ultimately decided not to circumcize, even though it was almost a forgone conclusion for us to have it done when I found out I was having a boy. My husband is circumcised after all, so it seemed like the 'normal' thing to do. I think the way I arrived at a decision was atypical, so I thought there would be some value in sharing. Anyway...
Long story short, after a conversation with friends I ended up taking a deep dive into online resources published by medical organizations in other countries. There are only five other countries in the world with a history of routine infant circumcision: UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and South Korea. Although the majority of boys in these countries used to have the procedure, circumcision rates are in very steep decline or practically eliminated in EVERY country. That's right, it was 'normal'...until it wasn't. Why? The medical establishment in each country decided the procedure was an unnecessary risk with dubious benefits. As a result, the circumcision guidelines published by foreign medical bodies tend to be more comprehensive than ours are. At the same time, they are much less in your face or biased than some of those anticircumcision websites out there.
I don't want to play activist here...this is a deeply personal decision and all advice should be given weight. I just encourage expecting parents to seek out resources from some of the countries I mentioned in order to make what they consider the best decision. If you care to take a look, here is a link to page that shifted my attitude towards circumcision. Notice how similar it is to American medical literature supporting the procedure:
https://raisingchildren.net.au/guides/a-z-health-reference/circumcision
Re: Our Circumcision Decision
You are subliminally trying to tell expecting mom not to circumcise- trying to play neutral - but its screaming 'don't circumcise.'
QFP
I don't know if I'm 'screaming don't circumcise'... obviously I made the decision not to, so I do hold a position...at one point I was really on the fence however. I just wanted to share my story with other people in the same position. I posted this on 3rd trimester so as not to offend anyone who has already reached a conclusion. I'm sorry...it's very hard not to come across as insensitive or preachy discussing this...
<img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/5020794/uploads/editor/c4/4ok89zx4qyju.gif" alt="">
That individual would no longer be my kids' pediatrician, faster than you can say, "hippocratic oath."
I'm sorry. I didn't realize you live in UGANDA. Based.
I personally have a thing I like to call, "first do no harm." Recognizing that just because he doesn't remember it, doesn't mean it didn't happen. Absolutely, there may be real and justified reasons based on a family's personal situation. But as a woman who had providers try to <i>scare me </i>into consenting<i> </i>to a c-section without a TOL, and then to see providers try to <i>scare parents</i> into cutting their child when he's "too young to remember," to my mind, seems pretty grim.
You may feel it's justified. I'm also allowed to say as a counterpoint, FOR MY CHILD, I wouldn't consider HIV prevention a justifiable argument. 🤷
I also didn't cuss at you. I am merely trying to point out for any other new or future parents out there, just because a doctor says a scary-sounding thing, or even presents a journal article or glossy brochure, doesn't mean that's necessarily the right decision for you. Parents ought to be empowered to research and think for themselves. White coat syndrome is real. Hopefully you're in a position where you trust your providers implicitly, but that's not always the case.
</div>
married 11.1.14
ttc #1 since 5.18
bfp 12.22.18 letrozole + progesterone
d&e due to trisomy 13/hydrops at 15wks
bfp 7.21.19 letrozole + IUI
little girl A born 3.26.20
The *first thing I said, actually*
<div class="Quote">BusinessWife member</div><div class="Quote">March 12</div><div class="Quote">Agreed that it's a personal decision and there's a lot to it. </div>
We can all agree to do own research, and be empowered to make whatever choices we feel are best for our own families. That there may be valid circumstances for one or the other. Glad to see once again, after all the <i>unecessary</i> <i>DRAMA</i>, to see we are actually in agreement.
<img alt="" src="https://us.v-cdn.net/5020794/uploads/editor/qc/o6x1wtmzbpuz.gif">
Lates.
<img alt="" src="https://us.v-cdn.net/5020794/uploads/editor/9z/2b53pgun8x34.gif">
Saying my personal choice is fear based is uncool. Experience is a cruel teacher and I refuse to put my kids through hell over a flap of skin they will never miss.
I am only playing devil's advocate if you will, because clearly the provider bias in the United States is towards performing circumcisions. (Arguably, pretty radical ones at that.) A parent is not going to get provider pushback in most cases from making that choice for their child. However, if choosing NOT to have it performed - in THIS country - parents are likely going to have to stand their ground if it's something they feel strongly about. You're not stating a controversial opinion by saying that was / would have been your choice to do. That is why I believe OP brought up the topic in the first place, to bring awareness to the opposite viewpoint.
*TW* I had a difficult labor/delivery and my son had an IV For antibiotics in his foot pretty much our whole stay so getting him circumcised was the last of my worries at that moment. Everything was all good though.
Married: 4/5/13
"You know that place between sleep and awake,
that place where you can still remember dreaming?
That's where I will always love you.
That's where I'll be waiting."
~Peter Pan
*TW*
BFP #2: 10/29/17 MMC dx @ 9 weeks
BFP #3: 2/2/18 MC 2/7/18
BFP #4: 3/2/18 MC 3/9/18
RPL testing and hysteroscopy: all normal
BFP #5: 4/1/18 MMC dx @ 14 weeks ----> genetically normal girl
Hysteroscopy to remove scar tissue 9/28
BFP #6 11/5/18 EDD 7/20/19 Rainbow baby girl born 7/23/19
BFP #7 12/8/2021 EDD 8/22/2022
<div class=" Spoiler">In all loving kindness, I would sincerely hope someone does have a better reason than _______ <i>scary thing my doctor said and handed me literature about,</i> (and she indicated that were was in fact more that went into the decision than that), but you are absolutely right that at the end of the day it's not my kid, not my decision. What do I care.</div>
Those kind of provider situations *do* make me a legit ragey however, because I have been in them more than once and I don't tolerate it anymore.
Married 8/16/13
BFP#1 DS 11/13/16
BFP# 2 MMC dx @ 13w 10/30/18
BFP# 3 Preemie DD born at 38w (IUGR) on 8/28/19 weighing 5.5lbs. Our little miracle
Married 8/16/13
BFP#1 DS 11/13/16
BFP# 2 MMC dx @ 13w 10/30/18
BFP# 3 Preemie DD born at 38w (IUGR) on 8/28/19 weighing 5.5lbs. Our little miracle
<div class=" Spoiler">You don't know me (but apparently you're following me), and I'm not your sister. I don't owe you any explanation. Suffice it to say it's got zero to do with homophobia or CLASSISM. 🤦
<img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/5020794/uploads/editor/t0/evs4csra989v.gif" alt="">
Spoiler alert: The answer to the question is not always to spin the wheel of, "because racism, because classism, because priviledge," etc. </div>
I did not wish to come back to this thread because certain individuals have chosen to single me out and attack me for whatever personal reasons, and I'm not interested. I don't expect everyone to agree with me, but I was attacked on this thread for reasons that have nothing to do with this thread, and lurkers took the opportunity to jump on board and pick me apart, too. Frankly, it's tacky.
I have long been a well-respected member of this community, and I have no time or love for ANYONE WHO WOULD SEEK TO MAKE THE BUMP UNWELCOMING. Which is exactly what certain individuals have done.
"circumcising males <i>seems </i>highly <i>desirable</i>, <i>especially in countries with a high prevalence of HIV infection</i>"
The article's conclusion is merely the authors's personal opinion, using terms like, "seems desirable," and then going on to state the rest.
</span>
<a rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_HIV/AIDS_adult_prevalence_rate" title="Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_HIV/AIDS_adult_prevalence_rate">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_HIV/AIDS_adult_prevalence_rate</a>
Granted it's Wikipedia, but I had to scroll pretty far down this list to even get to the United States. Which is where I live. So.
Clearly my personal opinion is WRONG, because I'm a privileged homophobe.
That's how this reads to me.
The study was done in Uganda. Their rate of HIV infection (in 2017) was 6.1%. That's a lot. Top countries on the top of the list? 27%, 23%, 22%, 17%, 13%, 12, 12%, 12%, 9.5%, 7%, and then Uganda.
I snarked someone for citing science that I believe <u><i>does not support </i></u>the recommendation for parents <u><i>in a country where the rate of HIV infection is actually quite low, at 0.4%</i></u> (as of 2017). I read the study, and I came to my own logical conclusion, which is like, what actual Scientists do.
You are just proving, case in point, that this thread turned into a witch hunt.
@cait32 Then you also remember that real snarkiness used to be such a joyous thing around here. Now people can't even take a gif.
<img alt="Bored Kill Me GIF - Find Share on GIPHY" src="https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2F3oKIPbnrmUYev49pgA%2Fgiphy-downsized-large.gif&f=1&nofb=1">
PS, just because you comment on every thread on TB doesn’t mean you’re well respected.
Married 8/16/13
BFP#1 DS 11/13/16
BFP# 2 MMC dx @ 13w 10/30/18
BFP# 3 Preemie DD born at 38w (IUGR) on 8/28/19 weighing 5.5lbs. Our little miracle
Married 8/16/13
BFP#1 DS 11/13/16
BFP# 2 MMC dx @ 13w 10/30/18
BFP# 3 Preemie DD born at 38w (IUGR) on 8/28/19 weighing 5.5lbs. Our little miracle