Question. Why'd they take her out early... Just curious because my girl has lots of issues 1- IUGR with 1percentile growth. 2- blood flow problems through umbilical cord. 3- breech 4- low amniotic fluid.
And yet they scheduled c section for 37w3d. Of course these things are still monitored every Tuesday and friday....but dr. wanted to make it to the security of 37 weeks.
Did your girl have other complications or was it just being breech? Again just curious.
I know everyone's different...but I find it interesting how dr.s do things.
@Chawk17 not to speak for @awhitehead88 but I assume she went into labor early and then had to be delivered by section because she was breech — not that she came early simply because she was breech. I don’t think breech presentation is a reason for scheduled section preterm.
@Chawk17 not to speak for @awhitehead88 but I assume she went into labor early and then had to be delivered by section because she was breech — not that she came early simply because she was breech. I don’t think breech presentation is a reason for scheduled section preterm.
She did not say or indicate that. So we dont know the story. So people shouldn't assume until she clarifies. Sorry but that wasn't your place to respond.
Given @awhitehead88 posted on our BMB a total of 4 times, one being this random announcement, I don’t think she’s coming back to answer any questions.
Me: late 30s | H: early 30s TTC #1 since April 2015 RE Dx: Fibroids, surgery Jan 2016 IUI #1 and #2, Nov/Dec 2016, BFN IVF March 2017: ER - 5R/3M/3F, 1 PGS normal Polyp removed May 2017 FET May 2017 - BFP! Baby boy born 2/2/18
@Chawk17 she indicated it by saying “baby girl decided to come early.” And I included the caveat that I wasn’t intending to speak for her. I obviously could be completely off base.
@Chawk17 not to speak for @awhitehead88 but I assume she went into labor early and then had to be delivered by section because she was breech — not that she came early simply because she was breech. I don’t think breech presentation is a reason for scheduled section preterm.
She did not say or indicate that. So we dont know the story. So people shouldn't assume until she clarifies. Sorry but that wasn't your place to respond.
She can respond however she damn well wants to whoever she wants....and her response actually made sense.
1. Considering she gave no other indications I think it is safe to assume that @psm2462 theory is correct as being breech is not a cause for early delivery and she did not mention issues with pre-e, BP, IUGR, etc. Not to mention I wouldn’t hold your breath that the other poster will actually respond given her overwhelming activity for the last 35 weeks...
2. Since when is it “your place” to police how/ what other members respond to on this board?
@Chawk17 I understood OP's post exactly the same way that @psm2462 did. I'm pretty sure she was just trying to be helpful. Nothing she said was out of line or presumptuous. It's totally understandable that you're anxious about your upcoming csection and the overall health of your lo. I can't imagine the stress you've been under. I hope you can see that you may have overreacted with your harsh response to someone who has generally been helpful and supportive on this thread.
Re: EDD Feb. 11 - Feb. 17 (35 Weeks) week of Jan. 7
Question. Why'd they take her out early...
Just curious because my girl has lots of issues
1- IUGR with 1percentile growth.
2- blood flow problems through umbilical cord.
3- breech
4- low amniotic fluid.
And yet they scheduled c section for 37w3d.
Of course these things are still monitored every Tuesday and friday....but dr. wanted to make it to the security of 37 weeks.
Did your girl have other complications or was it just being breech? Again just curious.
I know everyone's different...but I find it interesting how dr.s do things.
So people shouldn't assume until she clarifies.
Sorry but that wasn't your place to respond.
TTC #1 since April 2015
RE Dx: Fibroids, surgery Jan 2016
IUI #1 and #2, Nov/Dec 2016, BFN
IVF March 2017: ER - 5R/3M/3F, 1 PGS normal
Polyp removed May 2017
FET May 2017 - BFP!
Baby boy born 2/2/18
Not to mention I wouldn’t hold your breath that the other poster will actually respond given her overwhelming activity for the last 35 weeks...
2. Since when is it “your place” to police how/ what other members respond to on this board?
It's totally understandable that you're anxious about your upcoming csection and the overall health of your lo. I can't imagine the stress you've been under.
I hope you can see that you may have overreacted with your harsh response to someone who has generally been helpful and supportive on this thread.