February 2017 Moms

Suggestion

Since everyone is so concerned about sexual identity labeling why doesn't the bump do away with any team pink or team blue or tickers with anything but green backgrounds?  Isn't it presumptuous that if the baby's sex is one or the other that they should be identified by a particular color?
BabyFruit Ticker
«1

Re: Suggestion

  • Loading the player...
  • It is.  Why attach a color? 
    BabyFruit Ticker
  • Well the tickers could be someone just likes the color. And I don't mind the team pink or team blue stickers but I still think sex reveal parties are weird because you're having a party for someones genitalia. I also think it's weird when people post ultrasounds on Facebook with a big arrow pointing to it. 
  • If we're not attaching a color, then why not make everything white? Or black? When I did my ticker, I could choose what background color I wanted and I just picked something because obviously I don't know what baby is yet. A baby doesn't identify with any color. When you have a newborn it can be hard to tell so parents like to dress them to highlight that it's a boy/girl. But it doesn't have to be only blue or pink. I like purple for a girl. DH likes orange for a boy. I think green is more boy than neutral. It's more the parents preference than anything.  
    Me: 24  DH: 28

    Married: 9/2013

    Love my LEO!!

    TTC #1: 9/2015

    BFP: 2/1/16  MC 2/8/16 @ 5wks

    BFP: 5/22/16 RAINBOW BABY

    EDD: 1/30/2017 *IT'S A GIRL!!!!* 

    Kirsten Grace 1/20/17                            


    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • As far as I'm concerned people can use whatever color scheme they want for baby things.  I like blues and greens.  They're my favorite colors, and I probably won't bother to change my ticker if I end up with a girl because I'm lazy and not that into pink.  I think all anyone is saying is that it's polite to use the term sex instead of gender when referring to brand new infants.  
  • Many of the intro or weekly update board ask if you are team pink or blue?  Isn,t that gender assignment?  I'm just suggesting the TB be consistent.  Remove any and all reference to sex identity by color.  As a pp mentioned, perhaps black or white only would be more appropriate.
    BabyFruit Ticker
  • SSCmomma said:
    Many of the intro or weekly update board ask if you are team pink or blue?  Isn,t that gender assignment?  I'm just suggesting the TB be consistent.  Remove any and all reference to sex identity by color.  As a pp mentioned, perhaps black or white only would be more appropriate.
    Yeah no way this is serious. 
  • If you don't like choosing a color team then you by all means are free to not participate in that part. I think if people want to that's up to them and shouldn't be changed by the bump. Personally we're finding out the sex but honestly my favorite color is green so I'll probably keep a green ticker and my baby will probably wear a lot of green regardless of the sex.
    Me: 33 | DH: 34
    Married: October, 19, 2015
    EDD 2/22/17 <3 DS1 born on 3/2/17
    EDD 3/8/20 <3 DS2 born on 3/10/20
    EDD 11/24/23
    (Formerly Marriedhamstermom Feb ‘17)


  • I think this was a serious suggestion, but somewhat bizarre. I understand that people can identify how they want, and using the term sex is preferred over gender, and im glad that the people here have been patient with some who arent as aware of the terms, but typically people use blue or pink/purple just to show others that the baby they had was born a boy or girl. If people had to quit picking blue or pink they'll be asked the same thing just more blunt like are you team penis or team vagina. It's just a cute quick way of saying male or female parts. 
    Pregnancy Ticker
  • That is beyond crazy. If you don't want a pink or blue ticker than don't use one. People like using pink for a girl or blue for a boy. How is any parent to know what gender their baby is when they are born. If someone wants to use purple for a girl, let them do that. I really don't think you were genuinely concerned about this.
  • I spy a straw man. 
    I have never heard this phrase. 
    :::runs off to google:::
    I use this term in my line of work regularly, normally I hear them referred to as catfish... but going forward I will refer to them as straw men!
    ******************** BFP Warning *******************
     
    I'm 29 and DH is 32 we have a MFI (low count) 
    IVF #1 starting in August. ER 9/5/13 23 eggs we are fertilizing 15. 9 frozen
    ET 9/10 - transferred 1 perfect 5AA blast
    7dp5dt BFP ~~ Beta on 9/19 - 77.4 Beta #2 on 9/21 - 357
    Low heartbeat on 10/7 86, lower heartbeat on 10/11 76, no heartbeat 10/14/13. D&C 10/15/13
    Tests revealed MTHFR c677t mutation, put on Folgard.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    FET #1 1/6/14 - 4BB blast - BFN
    FET #2 - 3/3/14 - 5AB Blast -- Beta #1 3/12 - 152 -- Beta #2 3/14 - 358
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    FET #3 06/09/16 - 5AB Blast - Beta #1 6/18- 245 -- Beta #2 06/20 - 600
     PAIF/SAIF/PAL/SAL welcome!

  • FishyMom said:
    I spy a straw man. 
    I have never heard this phrase. 
    :::runs off to google:::
    I use this term in my line of work regularly, normally I hear them referred to as catfish... but going forward I will refer to them as straw men!
    That's actually not quite what it means, although I could see how you'd think so from the conversation.

    I *think* it means an argument meant to use backwards logic to distract you from the real facts of the situation.  I forget the exact origin but I'm sure it's Wikipedia or something.
  • FishyMom said:
    I spy a straw man. 
    I have never heard this phrase. 
    :::runs off to google:::
    I use this term in my line of work regularly, normally I hear them referred to as catfish... but going forward I will refer to them as straw men!
    That's actually not quite what it means, although I could see how you'd think so from the conversation.

    I *think* it means an argument meant to use backwards logic to distract you from the real facts of the situation.  I forget the exact origin but I'm sure it's Wikipedia or something.

    Huh... I suppose that would make more sense in my line of work, but I wonder what situation she is trying to distract from..... **squints eyes in suspicion**
    ******************** BFP Warning *******************
     
    I'm 29 and DH is 32 we have a MFI (low count) 
    IVF #1 starting in August. ER 9/5/13 23 eggs we are fertilizing 15. 9 frozen
    ET 9/10 - transferred 1 perfect 5AA blast
    7dp5dt BFP ~~ Beta on 9/19 - 77.4 Beta #2 on 9/21 - 357
    Low heartbeat on 10/7 86, lower heartbeat on 10/11 76, no heartbeat 10/14/13. D&C 10/15/13
    Tests revealed MTHFR c677t mutation, put on Folgard.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    FET #1 1/6/14 - 4BB blast - BFN
    FET #2 - 3/3/14 - 5AB Blast -- Beta #1 3/12 - 152 -- Beta #2 3/14 - 358
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    FET #3 06/09/16 - 5AB Blast - Beta #1 6/18- 245 -- Beta #2 06/20 - 600
     PAIF/SAIF/PAL/SAL welcome!

  • Assigning a color that is associated with a particular sex is assuming sexual identity for later in life.  I know many parents who choose to dress there child in strictly neutrals or give them neutral toys so as not to influence their child later gender decision.  Declaring them pink or blue prior to them even being born and them claiming to be concerned about their gender identity seems contradictory.  There are a number of bump members who a very concerned with this topic and the importance of not labeling our children so the suggestion seems relevant to the audience.
    BabyFruit Ticker
  • This is where I'll exit from this particular topic. I see this turning sour very quickly 
    Pregnancy Ticker
  • Thanks @MonaLisaRalphio!  So well said.  

    OP, still not clear what type of point you're trying but most on TB are aware of and sensitive to the sex/gender distinction and that's not likely to change anytime soon.
  • SSCmomma said:
    Assigning a color that is associated with a particular sex is assuming sexual identity for later in life.  I know many parents who choose to dress there child in strictly neutrals or give them neutral toys so as not to influence their child later gender decision.  Declaring them pink or blue prior to them even being born and them claiming to be concerned about their gender identity seems contradictory.  There are a number of bump members who a very concerned with this topic and the importance of not labeling our children so the suggestion seems relevant to the audience.
    Eh. So is giving your child a name associated with a particular sex. Some parents choose  neutral names or names with neutral nicknames. Some don't. Neither is particular associated with later gender/sex mismatch. 

    At some point, we'll all identify our kids by their sex - on their birth certificate if nowhere else. Some of them will  have a different gender identity, but it's not going to express itself in utero, or in the first few months of life. 


  • FishyMom said:
    I spy a straw man. 
    I have never heard this phrase. 
    :::runs off to google:::
    I use this term in my line of work regularly, normally I hear them referred to as catfish... but going forward I will refer to them as straw men!
    @FishyMom the "straw man fallacy," also called a "straw man argument," isn't related to catfishing. It's part of persuasive discourse or writing. I don't mean to be confusing! But it's not meant to be used interchangeably with "catfish" :)

    ________________________________________________________


    Started TTC #1 November 2015
    BFP 6/10/2016 - EDD 2/22/2017


    Pregnancy Ticker
  • @gingersnap the feeling's mutual, toots ;)

    ________________________________________________________


    Started TTC #1 November 2015
    BFP 6/10/2016 - EDD 2/22/2017


    Pregnancy Ticker
  • MrsDramaK said:
    Definitely agree with @MonaLisaRalphio that this is a straw man situation.  By going so far in one direction, it seems like she's trying to point out how wrong that stance is, but that's just how it looks to me.

    Also I agree with @marriedhamstermom obviously dressing any future children in pink or blue isn't forcing them to be straight or gay, it's just an easy way to identify gender.  If the child is born one gender and decides it wants to be another, or both, or neither, they don't know enough at birth to resent you for putting them in the wrong color.  I think your taking this too far by suggesting we only use Black and White on here.
    But a child is born a sex not a gender.  Gender isn't determined until later.
    BabyFruit Ticker
  • SweetTSweetT member
    Good grief 
  • @fourPsinapod ^ hilarious I laughed enough to look slightly crazy. I must be getting tired when I get a giggle fit like this.
    Pregnancy Ticker
  • The whole premise of the gender/sex thing is that labeling a child prior to their personal decision is wrong.  So far as to say that using the term gender to describe how a child is born is offensive.  Although you have to wonder if this horrific error that seems to be so frequently made by new members of tb it is in fact a hypersensitive issue exclusive to tb since most people make it 20, 30 even 40+ years without ever having to address it in the real world.  What if a bump member is having a girl and wants to be team blue?  Should they be obligated to clarify the distinction in their preference because they don't identify with the correct team color?

    Sincerely, the Scarecrow of straw.
    BabyFruit Ticker
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"