Just got back from this week's OB appointment and apparently baby is so big that my dr has concerns about her going to 40 weeks. She is also finally agreeing with the us now, which puts my due date up from Feb 2 to Jan 26.
So I'm a little unsettled by how big baby girl could possibly be. There was talk of membrane sweeping in 2 weeks! I'm so not ready.
Re: Anyone else's OB not want them to go 40 weeks?
3rd Tri u/s are very inaccurate for sizing. Baring any other medial reason (pre-e, low amniotic fluid, bad NST, uncontrolled GD, etc), let baby come when s/he is ready. 39-40.6 weeks is full term.
My OB wants to keep baby inside as long as mom/baby are healthy. Those last days are crucial for lung development.
https://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/News-Releases/2013/Ob-Gyns-Redefine-Meaning-of-Term-Pregnancy
January Siggy Challenge:
Being able to get out of bed on the first try
I'm not doubting you but that seems odd. My last u/s was at 32 weeks and baby was "weighing in" at 35.5 weeks without any mention of being large so this may just be bag in that Dr's feelings and level of comfort.
I think you should makes sure the OB goes over every single detail with you concerning height, weight and the level of accuracy for the particular u/s machine they used so that you can make the best possible decision for your family. I know some machines can be off by as much as 1 lb.
Also, just to clear up any confusion - just because they induce early, doesn't change your due date. Baby is still only 36weeks and a day right now even if the plan is for her to come at 39 weeks.
Feb'15 November Siggy Challenge:
Given that your doc has moved forward your due date, perhaps baby girl will come soon enough anyway, when she's good and ready? Also not sure how I feel about sweeping membranes in general, but that's another subject.
Good luck, don't panic, speak to your OB again about your concerns and don't let yourself be talked into something you're not happy with!
IVF FET - BFP, due April 2017
II'll be honest that I'm nervous about induction if nothing else is happening naturally. I fear an unnecessary c-section could result. I am going to talk to her about this in a few weeks if nothing happens on its own (due 2/1). FWIW, I don't think 1 week early would be detrimental to the baby health wise, but I'm nervous that it might not work if my body isn't ready, causing issues. We shall see.
BFP #2 11/6/13 - EDD 7/14/14 - blighted ovum discovered @ 7w - natural m/c @ 10w3d
BFP #3 5/25/14 - EDD 2/1/15 - Hoping this is our 2nd little owl
A/S findings: Baby is a girl! EIF found on heart
but maternit21 came back neg for chromosome disorders!!
@digwriter what exactly is being measured? Your statement makes it sound like fundal height? I'm measuring 40 weeks for fundal height and I'm only 36 weeks. My OB isn't concerned about fundal height though.
How I "know" my LO is "large" is both growth scans showed her around 85% percentile which was about what DS was when he was born.
Are you going to have a growth scan?
I've had growth scans and bpps done. Every test is saying that the baby is really big.But, like I said, I'd be concerned. I hope you get some better information. It must be frustrating and scary to sit with what you have.
Hugs!
First induction with DD went great, 16 hours from start I was holding her in my arms.
BFP #2: m/c at 7w, February, 2014
BFP #3: It's a BOY! Please be our rainbow! Due February, 2015
*everyone always welcome*
Pregnant diabetics are high-risk and that medical example does not apply to low-risk non-diabetic pregnant women. The children of diabetics are much more likely to have respiratory problems and lung development issues then others. The timing of delivery of these children is weighed against many risks and monitoring parameters.
BFP #2: m/c at 7w, February, 2014
BFP #3: It's a BOY! Please be our rainbow! Due February, 2015
*everyone always welcome*