SAHMs--I know you represent a wide group--my BMB will tell me to skip and Special Needs will tell me to go. What do you think?
M was born 8 weeks early, which means we get a general developmental assessment from time to time. She is scheduled for her 2 y.o. appt in a month, after she turns 2. At her 12 month appt, she would not do the tests at all. The person was assessing her and writing with a pen where M could reach it, and since pens were forbidden in our house, M really wanted her pen. Plus, she had a big box of toys in the assessment kit, but wouldn't let M get them out--just wanted her to do the tasks with the toy on the table. M kept trying to crawl under the table to get the box. She cried and cried when the person kept telling her no. The person then told me no 12 month old had behaved worse and that I had a discipline problem and I had better get it under control before high school.
M was upset so would not cooperate on the hearing test that was scheduled next and so got a "fail" although it was just because she did not keep the things in her ears. The main doctor then saw her, said she probably had an ear infection, which would explain her behavior and the hearing fail, and then spent 20 minutes with the nurse and I trying to hold down M so that he could look in her ears while M screamed and cried and squirmed. He ended up cutting her ear, told me she did have an infection, and that we needed to get her to the pediatrician's office ASAP. Then the developmental assessor popped back in to say that, oh, that's why your child was so ill-behaved. I, personally, knew she did not have an ear infection, and also did not think of M as a terrible behavior problem...we just kept things that she wasn't allowed to have out of sight and we didn't have major issues. I took her to the pedi anyway, who told me that M did not have an ear infection and that she was not delayed and that we did not need to go to the clinic anymore because it was just a lot of stress for us.
As the next test nears, I am pretty sure that she will not do the tests again. I can't be sure, but she tends to be pretty demanding about doing things her way. I do not think M is delayed, although she isn't very easy to understand when she speaks, so this is one way we could start the path to a speech therapist, although she probably would not qualify for Early On at this point. It will make me feel bad if they say M is delayed when she isn't, and it makes me feel bad, too, when they say she is a behavior-problem. I do worry that M might end up with ADHD or something but I do not believe 2 year-olds can be diagnosed with this, and I think that things like going to preschool will be a good test of whether M actually has a behavior problem. Right now she is a little more high spirited and active than some almost-2 year-olds, but I think her behavior falls within the realm of normal.
If she does the tests, the information we will get is along the lines of whether she is like an 18 month old or a 24 month old, etc. with respect to gross motor, fine motor, cognitive skills, etc. There is no formal behavioral evaluation, although they would probably refer us for more tests if they observed something to merit them.
Should we go or cancel? Thanks for reading.
Re: Go or skip developmental assessment
Personally, I would complete it. My DD was diagnosed with an unnamed chromosomal abnormality around 9 months. She was seen by numerous specialists and sent for similar testing. They were able to see delays that I was oblivious to. Additionally, as she got older she started struggling in other areas. They were able to catch these struggles and react immediately.
We worked with EI for many years and eventually when she started pre-school she started with an IEP. Since then she has made tremendous progress and began 1st grade without her IEP.
Should she begin to fall behind again, everything is well documented and we will not need to go through rounds of evaluations again. Documentation is key to fighting for services when and if your daughter eventually need services.
Sorry about the book, but again I would go.