I would love to hear some of your thoughts on pre-natal testing. I'm a non-US resident, currently at 12 weeks. My pregnancy was a surprise - so the insurance that i have doesn't really measure up for my circumstances. I travel for work, so it covers me globally and for most health needs - but is going to max out at around 1000 dollars for appointments and 7000 for the actual birth. It's for this reason, I'm going to be travelling back to my home country a couple months before due date and just having my baby there, where it's free, and the quality of care is equally good. If there's any complications, the costs in the USA could reach 100k - maybe even more.
My doctor here knows my circumstances - but there's so much grey area for testing. For example, testing for certain disorders, the only benefit is really just knowing in order to prepare yourself. Unless you first discuss, 'hey, if I found out this information and the results are negative, i'll terminate.' wouldn't it be better to have these things treated as optional?
For example, I've discovered I'm a carrier for Fragile X syndrome, after undergoing a test my doctor reccomended. Now, given this was my first birth, I just went with her advice. The company who managed the test has now reccommend I get my partner tested, but it was only after asking dozens more questions with my doctor was I able to ascertain that actually, the risk was VERY low and the reason I was reccomended to take the test was because I could know the genetic risk of my own child passing on fragile X to their children. Given it's 400 dollar cost, I don't see how this would be urged as such, no one person living today would be affected by the outcome. This is what pushes up insurance premiums for everyone! And for someone like me, it's going to be rude surprise when I receive the bill as costs of different tests are not broadly discussed in doctors offices. I've learnt it's my responsibility to speak up, but given most women (it seems) are covered where I'm being attended, the doctors just reccomend you do everything.
Does anyone else feel like they are being pressured into having tests that don't seem to be immediately helpful other than just giving you slim 'maybes' on various disorders? I know everyone is different, but frankly, I would rather reduce the stress of these outcomes and just hope for the best, address each situation as it comes once my baby is here. I feel like the moneymaking system here in the US isn't about providing options for mother's as rather just funding all these medical services.
This isn't like the movie Gattaca where we can choose to alter the health fate of our offspring once they are conceived. I'd love to know the opinions of those Momma's who perceive the benefits of 'knowing everything' and those who would rather 'hope for the best' and trust in fate. The question of how bad it needs to be before you'd consider to terminating is also on the table here and that's about as complicated and emotional as it gets.
Finally, the tests I'm most interested in are the ones that determine the immediate environment my child, anything that could jeopardize my baby or cause an early arrival - so I'm not really addressing those.
It's all so confusing!
Re: Prenatal testing - what's the point?
Some genetic testing results could absolutely change the way people plan for their child's future, plan to continue/end the pregnancy, or plan for how they achieve pregnancy in the first place.
I don't know if you have met with a geneticist about your Fragile X testing. As a female carrier, all of your male offspring are at an increased risk of having Fragile X. Your female offspring could just be carriers or have a generally "mild" version depending on the child's father's genetics. I know a lot about this so if you have questions let me know. A child with Fragile X syndrome will have a lot of challenges. My BIL is awesome, I've known him for 15 years since he was about 15 years old and have watched him grow in so many ways but it hasn't been easy.
That said, in your case if you don't want to know anything more in advance there is no obligation to continue testing and saying no is always an option. You should be able to ask your doctor about the specifics of what each test can provide you with and if you deem it useless information, opt out. Let you doctor know where you stand with all of this, and if they aren't providing you with the care and informed consent you're looking for change providers while it's still early.
Anyways, all I’m trying to say is that because I’m not sure what I would do with the information I’m not jumping at the chance to have the testing done.
I think it’s a very personal choice and there is no one size fits answer.
Now that I have my NIPT and NT scan results, I feel assured that my daughter does not presently have any genetic defects and we can continue the pregnancy without worry. Of course the anatomy scan will (hopefully) provide additional assurance since they check the heart chambers, etc. at that point.
Married Jan 2008
DD Baby Bells born Dec 2016 5 lbs, 12 oz, 18"
Due with #2 Baby Arya EDD February 2020
*Formerly LuND*
Me: 35 | DH: 37
TTC: 7/2016
Low AMH, mild MFI
BFP 7/29/17
EDD: 4/5/18
BFP #2 7/2/19
EDD 3/13/20
I guess it boils down to how you would feel if you skipped the testing and your child was born with a disorder that could've been detected by the optional prenatal testing.
Additionally, you may want to chat directly with any testing companies because they often offer discounts if you don't go through insurance. For instance, I know the "regular" cost for NIPT through companies like Counsyl and Harmony are $2000+. But, if you don't have or forgo billing your insurance, the cost drops to $250+, and they offer payment plans.
I happen to be in the "knowledge is power" camp, and I live in an ultra-conservative area that just assumes you don't want any testing because you wouldn't terminate even in a terminal situation. They also offer little to no education regarding testing options. It's infuriating.
Also, just for information's sake, I'm going to copy/paste some valuable info that @emmasemm posted in March 2020 (I hope you don't mind!):
Another important point is that some of them only test for the three most common trisomies, whereas others you can optionally add on to screen for sex chromosome linked conditions eg XXY or some common microdeletions.
Most well known name brand is Harmony who for T21 does have a greater than 99% detection rate for T21 (but much lower for T13 and T18 - but the other screens have the same lower rates for these too - and sometimes much lower!) and an only 1 in 1600 false positive rate. The difference in the error and detection rates do differ a lot between the screens!
Also SUPER IMPORTANT is to note that none of these only screen are perfect and they don’t test for everything, plus very critically they are not diagnostic tests - very important OBs etc don’t lead anyone to think these are diagnostic tests as they are not - CVS and Amniocentesis are the only common in utero diagnostic tests (and come with their own risks as they are invasive).
The NT scan combined with the blood test for PAPP-A and free b-HCG is normally known as “first trimester screening”. This is based on measurements and where the three all fall in the database they have - thick NT, high free b-HCG and low PAPP-A indicates a higher risk. But the ranges and interactions are quite complex so don’t try to calculate anything yourself (I’m a mathematician and I might half want to try but I won’t...). If someone uses the term NIPT it doesn’t officially include this first trimester screening.
Many OBs will offer and compare the results from both NIPT and first trimester screening to have a fuller picture if you’re in a risk group.
Or some will do NIPT and just the NT measurement as a sanity check.
Most of the NIPT Tests need you to be over 10 weeks for the blood draw as that’s when the plugs no longer stop the babies blood mixing with the mothers - of course it can be a few days earlier but on average 10 weeks means everyone should get a result. Earlier you might risk a report of not enough fetal material.
Whether you do NIPT, first trimester screening or both or none - the 12ish week scan where they should do a “mini anatomy scan” and check there are not already any anomalies showing is very important for either confirming the results from the screening or maybe spotting signs which could mean something less common is going on which the screening doesn’t test for. Or it can give reassurance everything looks ok so far!
At 16 weeks you can also opt for the less popular “quad screen” which is like an extended version of the first trimester screening. It’s a blood test of four things - and particular also includes AFP which is the only screen (other than US - yes officially US is also a screening tool...) where potential signs of neural tube defects can be picked up so early. Only other ways are again with amino at that stage - which is invasive but definitive. It’s less popular as it’s so much later - before NIPT it was much more popular as it’s more accurate than first tri screening - in that it had less false negatives and false positives.
You can also do the AFP blood draw on its own then together with an US - especially if all your NIPT or first tri screening showed very low risk. So no need to the full quad screen if you just want to add the check on the neural tube stuff.
Once again, the only real issue to keep in mind is that the only trisomy that all the screenings have great accuracy on is T21. The others are still pretty accurate in some cases, but I was recommended to always compare the risk outcome with what is seen on ultrasound. And it’s such a small number of conditions they do screen for. Not wanting to scare anyone as the less common ones are just that - less common.
If you get a high risk, then my heart is with you. Deciding whether to do an amino or not, or what action to take is heartbreaking whatever happens. I also think this a very personal choice and everyone should do what is right for them and their family.
But i do also think knowledge is power in that you can prepare for whatever is coming.
*Formerly LuND*
Me: 35 | DH: 37
TTC: 7/2016
Low AMH, mild MFI
BFP 7/29/17
EDD: 4/5/18
BFP #2 7/2/19
EDD 3/13/20
It's such a personal choice! There is no risk to the baby so it is really the $350 versus the peace of mind of knowing.
Married Jan 2008
DD Baby Bells born Dec 2016 5 lbs, 12 oz, 18"
Due with #2 Baby Arya EDD February 2020
I think these pregnancy hormones are getting the best of me. Phew! This thread is too much 😂