Have any mamas had one LO stay in the room with them after birth and another go to the hospital nursery? Is the nursery worth using?
I stayed with a friend at the hoapital years ago after she had her LO and thought that her sending the baby to the nursery meant she'd get decent sleep, with the exception of feedings. Nope... The nurses were constantly in and out... Which made me wonder if using the nursery is really worth it.
FYI- I know this is super premature but it came up with DH and I during a convo about upping our insurance during open enrollment so we pay less OOP for copays and the hospital stay. I remember hearing that the nursery is expensive to use and just wondering about others' experiences.
Re: Baby staying in hospital room vs nursery
TTC#2: BFP: 8-23-15 MMC: 10-29-15
DD 2: 9-15-16
DD 3: 9-16-17
DD #1 born 6/12/14
DD #2 born 10/31/16
That said, I got very little sleep in the hospital, and I'm not sure if using the nursery would have made a difference or not. I don't think I slept more than 30-60 minutes at a time, but I took naps during the day too. Some of it was nursing, some were all the checks of people coming in and out of the room, and some was the pain I was in after they took the IV meds away (I had a c-section) and switched me to pills the second day.
I plan to keep this baby in the room with me too, but would consider the nursery depending on circumstances this time.
LFAF April Siggy: TV/Movie BFFs
BFP #4 1/2016, DD born 10/2016
We really liked having her in the room with us, but it's a matter of preference. I wouldn't stress too much about it right now; I suspect this is one of those things that you can't predict until it happens to you.
edit: posted mid sentence
This time I will definitely send my little one to the nursery at least once over night. The way I see it, it's the last time I'll have overnight help.
I guess looking back, it would have been nice to have him in the nursery, ha! But at the time I was so in love with him I didn't want him out of my sight. In fact he slept on my chest and my husbands chest all night and didn't once sleep in the little bassinet (which the nurses weren't too happy about haha).
I wouldn't have wanted it any other way, even though I had a very long and difficult labor and lost a lot of blood.
Honestly, I don't remember being interrupted too much and actually got decent sleep. I delivered around 4pm and left the next day around 5pm, so we were only there one night. As for showering, I took one a few hours after delivery. This was dh's first chance to hold him and then the nurse did his measurements and hand and foot prints in the room. Later a different nurse came in and did his first bath in the room. The next day, a peds doctor came in and examined him and they did his blood tests and hearing screen. So it's certainly possible to have everything done without a trip to the nursery depending on how the hospital works. The only thing that he probably would have been separated for was if we had him circumcised at the hospital.
We plan on the same for this one.
Also, not everyone breastfeeds. A huge part of the "baby-friendly hospital" movement is to encourage breastfeeding. I personally did not and will not BF (due to a host of reasons) but exclusively pump. I don't think it's up to the hospital to tell a mother what's best and then try to force them to go that route by requiring the baby to stay in the room.
At some point a hospital needs to put the mom first. A happy, rested mother is a good mother. A mother stressed out from the get-go because she hasn't been allowed to get the rest and recovery she needs is, to me, cruel. I realize my opinion is probably an unpopular one, but it's just as valid as those who wholeheartedly believe that the baby should be in-room at all times.
youre not less of a mother if you want a break. I'm pretty sure everyone NEEDS one.
I feel like it's a lot like the breastfeeding thing, yes maybe BF and closeness to mom is best, but it might not be best for every person and that's ok too.
A nursery would have been nice, but I'd also settle for a room where all the newborns didn't constantly wake eachother up! I don't think you need to worry about it yet, but if you want options look into them. I think there's no right answer, it's whatever feels best for you and your family.
O16 April Siggy
Sorry got a little windy there.
FTR, I think the baby friendly designation is a wonderful thing.
Married 7/15
BFP #2 2/18/16
It's great you're choosing to give birth at a center where you'll have the experience you want. I think the bigger point is that many women WON'T get a choice if they have to give birth at a hospital that has made the decision for them that babies stay in-room. Some mothers need a little time away from baby no matter how YOU personally feel. I'm sure you'd be up in arms if the standard was to bring the baby to the nursery every night, no matter what your wishes. Nobody wants to be told what is best for them, so try to have a little compassion.
Personally, although I think the term "baby friendly" is a little silly, I like it because I think it represents a backlash to overmedicalizing pregnancy and birth. I think it's the best of both worlds because many labors and births are normal and should be treated as such. However, if you do have a medical emergency, the best care is right there. And I absolutely love that homier birthing suites are more common now. I hate hospitals anyways and I can't imagine how much it would suck to be in an ER type room for hours on end, and then share a room with someone after baby is born. I think it's a good thing that hospitals are reflecting patient's needs in these ways. Of course, overall, the more options the better! Everyone's needs are different!
It's a boy!
LFAF April Siggy: TV/Movie BFFs
BFP #4 1/2016, DD born 10/2016