I don't know if this title makes sense BUT I've always liked the idea of my kids names having dual use - as in a shortened version we can use for everyday and an alternative long version for more versatility as they get older (or for when they're in trouble in our house, lol).
- DS is Elijah - but he has been called Eli since day 1
- DD is going to be Lucy but full name would probably be Lucille
Anybody else planning on using a shortened version of their kid's name from the start?
Re: Full names vs. 'nicknames'
ETA: my SIL named her daughter Ellie (not a nn) which I suppose you could still shorten to Elle if you want to, but there are just so many options for a longer name, but now the longest name she can go by is just Ellie.
Edic because autocorrect doesn't like my guessing on spellings?
PS: Love DD1's name.
ex - my favorite if this baby is a boy is Theodore. I also like the nicknames Ted/Teddy and Theo, but I have no idea which if either we would use until they come naturally.
With this one if it's a boy the name will be shortened. If it's a girl no...but I don't know how you shorten Jade.
As a Samantha, I have grown to dislike all the nickname possibilities. At one point in college I tried to shake my childhood nickname, Sam, to no avail. Even now at work if I know someone via email only and sign my emails with my full name, that person will inevitably start calling me Sam (or worse, Sammy). For this reason, I am really only considering stand alone names for my LO.
Marriage: 12.18.04
DD1: 5.19.10
DD2: 4.11.12
I really like DH's first name (Matthew), but everyone calls him Matt. It drives me crazy! Even he prefers Matthew. My name doesn't have any nicknames, thank goodness.
My mom didn't care for nicknames either, but she named her youngest Samuel. That created some hilarious moments (someone would say something about "Sam" and we'd be like "who?" People learned fast.
She even tells people her name is NOT Adyson haha