We will be giving baby all recommended vaccines so that she will have the best protection possible. My husband is a microbiologist that works in vaccine research. Also, the eye ointment is not only for protection against STDs but also keeps baby from getting pink eye in the event that they are exposed to fecal matter during the birthing process. As it is not uncommon for a woman to have a bowel movement during birth.
It's not for pink eye
Really? Pink eye was causing blindness in up to 3% of infants before the eye ointment became a common practice. Do you also believe antibiotics don't work?
Instead of vaccinations, just fill his first bottle with Emergen-C. It's basically the same, I mean better.
Add essential oils to his bath.
Don't forgot to burn sage in the nursery to ward off disease and evil spirits.
Never take your baby to a doctor. Instead, take him to one of those all-knowing Pharmacists. They will know what to do. Or a wizard, perhaps.
Or you could come back to planet earth and get your kid vaccinated.
My babies get nothing liquid outside of breastmilk for the first year.
Oil never mixes with water, so no thanks.
I have God in my life, don't need to hold His hand and help Him. Besides, He's the one who blessed us with this baby.
I prefer a functioning doctor, thanks.
I know you're being snarky, I can do it too
My kids haven't gotten any of the diseases you're paranoid your kids will be getting. I just don't pump my kids with dangerous things, things from animal body parts, or things from fetuses.
Not paranoid, just sane. And...you're not great at being snarky. You're good at being sharky, though.
Instead of vaccinations, just fill his first bottle with Emergen-C. It's basically the same, I mean better.
Add essential oils to his bath.
Don't forgot to burn sage in the nursery to ward off disease and evil spirits.
Never take your baby to a doctor. Instead, take him to one of those all-knowing Pharmacists. They will know what to do. Or a wizard, perhaps.
Or you could come back to planet earth and get your kid vaccinated.
My babies get nothing liquid outside of breastmilk for the first year.
Oil never mixes with water, so no thanks.
I have God in my life, don't need to hold His hand and help Him. Besides, He's the one who blessed us with this baby.
I prefer a functioning doctor, thanks.
I know you're being snarky, I can do it too
My kids haven't gotten any of the diseases you're paranoid your kids will be getting. I just don't pump my kids with dangerous things, things from animal body parts, or things from fetuses.
The level of ignorance is unreal. I'm sorry you have to hide behind your religion because you can't reconcile it with science. The two are not mutually exclusive.
Instead of vaccinations, just fill his first bottle with Emergen-C. It's basically the same, I mean better.
Add essential oils to his bath.
Don't forgot to burn sage in the nursery to ward off disease and evil spirits.
Never take your baby to a doctor. Instead, take him to one of those all-knowing Pharmacists. They will know what to do. Or a wizard, perhaps.
Or you could come back to planet earth and get your kid vaccinated.
My babies get nothing liquid outside of breastmilk for the first year.
Oil never mixes with water, so no thanks.
I have God in my life, don't need to hold His hand and help Him. Besides, He's the one who blessed us with this baby.
I prefer a functioning doctor, thanks.
I know you're being snarky, I can do it too
My kids haven't gotten any of the diseases you're paranoid your kids will be getting. I just don't pump my kids with dangerous things, things from animal body parts, or things from fetuses.
Not paranoid, just sane. And...you're not great at being snarky. You're good at being sharky, though.
Considering you're injecting them with products to ward off things that haven't happened to either of your kids or mine, that doesn't sound too sane.
We will be giving baby all recommended vaccines so that she will have the best protection possible. My husband is a microbiologist that works in vaccine research. Also, the eye ointment is not only for protection against STDs but also keeps baby from getting pink eye in the event that they are exposed to fecal matter during the birthing process. As it is not uncommon for a woman to have a bowel movement during birth.
It's not for pink eye
Really? Pink eye was causing blindness in up to 3% of infants before the eye ointment became a common practice. Do you also believe antibiotics don't work?
I don't use antibiotics when I can avoid it. I use natural remedies for everything my kids have ever faced in the last two years, including pink eye.
Really? Pink eye was causing blindness in up to 3% of infants before the eye ointment became a common practice. Do you also believe antibiotics don't work?
Pink eye = conjunctivitis = the same condition babies can get from exposure to STDs. I think people are getting mixed up with the wording.
ETA: people are assuming that the term pink eye/conjunctivitis refers to something different than STD eye infections. Conjunctivitis can be caused by many things, including STDs. The erythromycin given is intended to prevent chlamydia/gonorrhea conjunctivitis and resulting blindness. I hope that makes more sense.
Really? Pink eye was causing blindness in up to 3% of infants before the eye ointment became a common practice. Do you also believe antibiotics don't work?
Pink eye = conjunctivitis = the same condition babies can get from exposure to STDs. I think people are getting mixed up with the wording.
Funny, people don't know that polio goes by a different name currently too!
Instead of vaccinations, just fill his first bottle with Emergen-C. It's basically the same, I mean better.
Add essential oils to his bath.
Don't forgot to burn sage in the nursery to ward off disease and evil spirits.
Never take your baby to a doctor. Instead, take him to one of those all-knowing Pharmacists. They will know what to do. Or a wizard, perhaps.
Or you could come back to planet earth and get your kid vaccinated.
My babies get nothing liquid outside of breastmilk for the first year.
Oil never mixes with water, so no thanks.
I have God in my life, don't need to hold His hand and help Him. Besides, He's the one who blessed us with this baby.
I prefer a functioning doctor, thanks.
I know you're being snarky, I can do it too
My kids haven't gotten any of the diseases you're paranoid your kids will be getting. I just don't pump my kids with dangerous things, things from animal body parts, or things from fetuses.
"Things from animal body parts, things from fetuses,".... Your rationale is extremely confusing to me. Do you also not feed your children meat? Because, what your saying is it's dangerous to pump animal body parts into your kids.... But, When they eat meat you know that they are consuming animal parts, yes?
Considering you're injecting them with products to ward off things that haven't happened to either of your kids or mine, that doesn't sound too sane.
My kids haven't gotten those things because they've been vaccinated. My son was actually exposed to whooping cough and was protected through his vaccine.
Considering you're injecting them with products to ward off things that haven't happened to either of your kids or mine, that doesn't sound too sane.
My kids haven't gotten those things because they've been vaccinated. My son was actually exposed to whooping cough and was protected through his vaccine.
Has he been diagnosed with croup? That's the newest name for it, in case you weren't aware.
Funny, people don't know that polio goes by a different name currently too!
I was partially referring to you (and others) who are getting mixed up on the wording. You said it's not for pink eye. Technically it is. It's for STD associated conjunctivitis, not the typical viral stuff you see spreading around daycares/schools.
Considering you're injecting them with products to ward off things that haven't happened to either of your kids or mine, that doesn't sound too sane.
My kids haven't gotten those things because they've been vaccinated. My son was actually exposed to whooping cough and was protected through his vaccine.
I'm glad to hear he wasn't infected! Healthy babies(even if they have surpassed the "baby" age, all children are babies!), yaaaay.
Considering you're injecting them with products to ward off things that haven't happened to either of your kids or mine, that doesn't sound too sane.
My kids haven't gotten those things because they've been vaccinated. My son was actually exposed to whooping cough and was protected through his vaccine.
Has he been diagnosed with croup? That's the newest name for it, in case you weren't aware.
Whooping cough (or pertussis) is a contagious bacterial infection.
Croup (laryngo-tracheo-bronchitis) is a viral infection triggered by allergies or illnesses like RSV.
Funny, people don't know that polio goes by a different name currently too!
I was partially referring to you (and others) who are getting mixed up on the wording. You said it's not for pink eye. Technically it is. It's for STD associated conjunctivitis, not the typical viral stuff you see spreading around daycares/schools.
*snort* you just admitted it comes from STDs...... Which is the only reason why they push the eye ointment.
It's not for what's the common version of pink eye. It's to protect baby from chlamydia and gonorrhea
Considering you're injecting them with products to ward off things that haven't happened to either of your kids or mine, that doesn't sound too sane.
My kids haven't gotten those things because they've been vaccinated. My son was actually exposed to whooping cough and was protected through his vaccine.
Has he been diagnosed with croup? That's the newest name for it, in case you weren't aware.
Whooping cough (or pertussis) is a contagious bacterial infection.
Croup (laryngo-tracheo-bronchitis) is a viral infection triggered by allergies or illnesses like RSV.
Stop spreading your lies here.
Did you miss this @sharkgirl7? They are not the same.
-starts out similar to a cold, symptoms worsen after a week or two
-"Severe and prolonged coughing attacks may:
Provoke vomiting
Result in a red or blue face
Cause extreme fatigue
End with a high-pitched "whoop" sound during the next breath of air"
Whooping Cough Gets A Revamp Whooping cough has also been found to have a name change. It has been reported over and over that cases of whooping cough have been diagnosed in fully vaccinated children. In fact one report stated that vaccine failure has actually been admitted. Natural News (10) reported:
New research reported by Reuters reveals that whooping cough outbreaks are HIGHER among vaccinated children compared with unvaccinated children. This is based on a study led by Dr. David Witt, an infectious disease specialist at the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in San Rafael, California.
Doctors have known this for a very long time and there could be many more cases than we could ever imagine. Professionals have discovered that doctors have been diagnosing whooping cough as croup!.
Dr Viera Scheibner says:
In the Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1994, “Age Specific Incidence of Bacteriologically Confirmed Pertussis, between 1981 and 1991 – ten year follow-up”.(11) The majority of cases occurred in the most vulnerable age group below the age of one year in the most vaccinated children. Actually the majority of cases happened within the first four months. The vaccine is causing whooping cough. A lot of children develop whooping cough from the vaccine, but if they are vaccinated, it will be diagnosed as ‘croup’.
Bronwyn Hancock Vaccine Information Service agrees (12) stating:
“(2) The diagnostic guidelines given to doctors were supplemented with “No history of vaccination” when the vaccines were introduced. Even without these written guidelines, doctors are taught that vaccines are effective. The result is that upon seeing an illness in a child who has been vaccinated “against” it, doctors have been observed to conclude that the disease must be a different disease, so the case of the disease is not reported.
For example whooping cough gets called “croup” when it occurs in vaccinated children, and diphtheria gets called such names as “epiglotitis”, or, as in this case, described in “Raising a Vaccine Free Child”, by Wendy Lydall (2005, pg 68),
‘Her aunt had nursed diphtheria cases in Britain in the 1950s, and she said that her niece had the typical symptoms of diphtheria. The girl was flown by helicopter to a bigger hospital in Auckland, where they took a swab from her throat and confirmed diphtheria. When they learned that the girl was fully immunised, one of the doctors said to the mother, “Then it can’t be diphtheria.” They changed the diagnosis to bacterial tracheitis.’
So the teaching of doctors that vaccination will reduce number of cases *reported* of a disease is a self-fulfilling prophecy, regardless of how many cases there are in reality.”
The bottom line is parents are being duped into believing that vaccinations will protect children from deadly diseases when in fact they protect children from absolutely nothing. The truth is that more and more vaccinated children are becoming sick with the diseases that they have been vaccinated against and research is revealing that doctors are devising clever ways to cover this up. Not only this but the adverse reactions that children can have from the vaccines, are potentially worse than the diseases themselves. It seems to me that vaccinations are little more than a get rich quick scheme run by the pharmaceutical industries and endorsed by the governments. This is not only criminal it is fraud by any other name.
Guyz. I totes got the flu from the flu shot. You don't even know what you're talking about. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea. Definitely the flu. Cause, you know the stomach "flu" is the same thing as influenza, right?
Semantics. They'll get you every time. (Unless, of course, you take two seconds to research what you think you're talking about).
*Croup =/= "whooping cough" (pertussis) *stomach flu =/= influenza *conjunctivitis = pink eye = something you can get from STDs
Really? Pink eye was causing blindness in up to 3% of infants before the eye ointment became a common practice. Do you also believe antibiotics don't work?
Pink eye = conjunctivitis = the same condition babies can get from exposure to STDs. I think people are getting mixed up with the wording.
ETA: people are assuming that the term pink eye/conjunctivitis refers to something different than STD eye infections. Conjunctivitis can be caused by many things, including STDs. The erythromycin given is intended to prevent chlamydia/gonorrhea conjunctivitis and resulting blindness. I hope that makes more sense.
I just remember my staff discussing the slim possibilities of it during our tour and introductions. Thanks for a more detailed clarification! (Still getting the ointment because I am a very "possible benefit outweighs possible risk" type person. Not that the opinions of here in favor of either would ever be convincing to change my mind. Just wanted to say thanks!)
-starts out similar to a cold, symptoms worsen after a week or two
-"Severe and prolonged coughing attacks may:
Provoke vomiting
Result in a red or blue face
Cause extreme fatigue
End with a high-pitched "whoop" sound during the next breath of air"
Whooping Cough Gets A Revamp Whooping cough has also been found to have a name change. It has been reported over and over that cases of whooping cough have been diagnosed in fully vaccinated children. In fact one report stated that vaccine failure has actually been admitted. Natural News (10) reported:
New research reported by Reuters reveals that whooping cough outbreaks are HIGHER among vaccinated children compared with unvaccinated children. This is based on a study led by Dr. David Witt, an infectious disease specialist at the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in San Rafael, California.
Doctors have known this for a very long time and there could be many more cases than we could ever imagine. Professionals have discovered that doctors have been diagnosing whooping cough as croup!.
Dr Viera Scheibner says:
In the Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1994, “Age Specific Incidence of Bacteriologically Confirmed Pertussis, between 1981 and 1991 – ten year follow-up”.(11) The majority of cases occurred in the most vulnerable age group below the age of one year in the most vaccinated children. Actually the majority of cases happened within the first four months. The vaccine is causing whooping cough. A lot of children develop whooping cough from the vaccine, but if they are vaccinated, it will be diagnosed as ‘croup’.
Bronwyn Hancock Vaccine Information Service agrees (12) stating:
“(2) The diagnostic guidelines given to doctors were supplemented with “No history of vaccination” when the vaccines were introduced. Even without these written guidelines, doctors are taught that vaccines are effective. The result is that upon seeing an illness in a child who has been vaccinated “against” it, doctors have been observed to conclude that the disease must be a different disease, so the case of the disease is not reported.
For example whooping cough gets called “croup” when it occurs in vaccinated children, and diphtheria gets called such names as “epiglotitis”, or, as in this case, described in “Raising a Vaccine Free Child”, by Wendy Lydall (2005, pg 68),
‘Her aunt had nursed diphtheria cases in Britain in the 1950s, and she said that her niece had the typical symptoms of diphtheria. The girl was flown by helicopter to a bigger hospital in Auckland, where they took a swab from her throat and confirmed diphtheria. When they learned that the girl was fully immunised, one of the doctors said to the mother, “Then it can’t be diphtheria.” They changed the diagnosis to bacterial tracheitis.’
So the teaching of doctors that vaccination will reduce number of cases *reported* of a disease is a self-fulfilling prophecy, regardless of how many cases there are in reality.”
The bottom line is parents are being duped into believing that vaccinations will protect children from deadly diseases when in fact they protect children from absolutely nothing. The truth is that more and more vaccinated children are becoming sick with the diseases that they have been vaccinated against and research is revealing that doctors are devising clever ways to cover this up. Not only this but the adverse reactions that children can have from the vaccines, are potentially worse than the diseases themselves. It seems to me that vaccinations are little more than a get rich quick scheme run by the pharmaceutical industries and endorsed by the governments. This is not only criminal it is fraud by any other name.
The doctor you are quoting is a GEOLOGIST. She did one year of medical study and was never accredited in ANY form. This is your definition of research?!
While it's okay to do your homework, let's not confuse pseudoscience and science. More people drown when ice cream sales increase, but the third variable there is the weather. Similarly, getting sick around the time you get a vaccine does not mean you got sick from the vaccine. It's dangerous to perpetuate misunderstandings of health.
The doctor you are quoting is a GEOLOGIST. She did one year of medical study and was never accredited in ANY form. This is your definition of research?!
-starts out similar to a cold, symptoms worsen after a week or two
-"Severe and prolonged coughing attacks may:
Provoke vomiting
Result in a red or blue face
Cause extreme fatigue
End with a high-pitched "whoop" sound during the next breath of air"
Whooping Cough Gets A Revamp
Whooping cough has also been found to have a name change. It has been reported over and over that cases of whooping cough have been diagnosed in fully vaccinated children. In fact one report stated that vaccine failure has actually been admitted. Natural News (10) reported:
New research reported by Reuters reveals that whooping cough outbreaks are HIGHER among vaccinated children compared with unvaccinated children. This is based on a study led by Dr. David Witt, an infectious disease specialist at the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in San Rafael, California.
Doctors have known this for a very long time and there could be many more cases than we could ever imagine. Professionals have discovered that doctors have been diagnosing whooping cough as croup!.
Dr Viera Scheibner says:
In the Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1994, “Age Specific Incidence of Bacteriologically Confirmed Pertussis, between 1981 and 1991 – ten year follow-up”.(11) The majority of cases occurred in the most vulnerable age group below the age of one year in the most vaccinated children. Actually the majority of cases happened within the first four months. The vaccine is causing whooping cough. A lot of children develop whooping cough from the vaccine, but if they are vaccinated, it will be diagnosed as ‘croup’.
Bronwyn Hancock Vaccine Information Service agrees (12) stating:
“(2) The diagnostic guidelines given to doctors were supplemented with “No history of vaccination” when the vaccines were introduced. Even without these written guidelines, doctors are taught that vaccines are effective. The result is that upon seeing an illness in a child who has been vaccinated “against” it, doctors have been observed to conclude that the disease must be a different disease, so the case of the disease is not reported.
For example whooping cough gets called “croup” when it occurs in vaccinated children, and diphtheria gets called such names as “epiglotitis”, or, as in this case, described in “Raising a Vaccine Free Child”, by Wendy Lydall (2005, pg 68),
‘Her aunt had nursed diphtheria cases in Britain in the 1950s, and she said that her niece had the typical symptoms of diphtheria. The girl was flown by helicopter to a bigger hospital in Auckland, where they took a swab from her throat and confirmed diphtheria. When they learned that the girl was fully immunised, one of the doctors said to the mother, “Then it can’t be diphtheria.” They changed the diagnosis to bacterial tracheitis.’
So the teaching of doctors that vaccination will reduce number of cases *reported* of a disease is a self-fulfilling prophecy, regardless of how many cases there are in reality.”
The bottom line is parents are being duped into believing that vaccinations will protect children from deadly diseases when in fact they protect children from absolutely nothing. The truth is that more and more vaccinated children are becoming sick with the diseases that they have been vaccinated against and research is revealing that doctors are devising clever ways to cover this up. Not only this but the adverse reactions that children can have from the vaccines, are potentially worse than the diseases themselves. It seems to me that vaccinations are little more than a get rich quick scheme run by the pharmaceutical industries and endorsed by the governments. This is not only criminal it is fraud by any other name.
The study you are referring to in Reuters does not compare vaccinated children to unvaccinated children; it compares different age groups of vaccinated children to determine the life span of the vaccination, not its effectiveness when administered:
The other findings you listed are all well over a decade old, and show no evidence of being credible sources. And considering you misquoted the Reuters article, I have a hard time believing you are conveying any information accurately in your posts. So please be quiet now.
this was fun! The ice cream comment reminded me that in the beginning of the polio outbreak in the US back in the day, people thought it was caused by ice cream because more kids were being diagnosed in the summer, when they were more likely to eat ice cream. Turns out it was from swimming, another common summer activity (but i'm too tired to confirm this story online right now). Anyone?
Poor, silly @sharkgirl7 and all of her really misinformed and honestly, dumb, ideas. The more she said, the more I wanted to reach out and slap her awake because she's clearly not living in reality. I just hope she was trolling this thread and she doesn't actually believe anything she said here.
And my sister had croup as a toddler and it was nothing like whooping cough. I was 10 years old at the time and remember it very well.
There needs to be an option to report someone for simply being a colossal a*hat. I mean really, if you're going to ignore all of the posts that present factual information about the differences in these ailments just so you can keep pushing your lies why bother? The risks to immunizations is so incredibly low and the sicknesses that they protect from are deadly. To me that makes it a pretty simple decision.
Here's another article with lots of evidence based facts and sources regarding the eye ointment.
i love that you always make sure to back your stuff up and share your sources with us
Thank you. By giving people information to actually research and form their own opinions, people can give informed consent, which to me is very important. That's the only thing I will ever agree with Sharkgirl on.
Re: Immunizations do or don't and why?
Not paranoid, just sane. And...you're not great at being snarky. You're good at being sharky, though.
ETA: people are assuming that the term pink eye/conjunctivitis refers to something different than STD eye infections. Conjunctivitis can be caused by many things, including STDs. The erythromycin given is intended to prevent chlamydia/gonorrhea conjunctivitis and resulting blindness. I hope that makes more sense.
"Things from animal body parts, things from fetuses,".... Your rationale is extremely confusing to me. Do you also not feed your children meat? Because, what your saying is it's dangerous to pump animal body parts into your kids.... But, When they eat meat you know that they are consuming animal parts, yes?
Has he been diagnosed with croup? That's the newest name for it, in case you weren't aware.
I'm glad to hear he wasn't infected! Healthy babies(even if they have surpassed the "baby" age, all children are babies!), yaaaay.
Whooping cough (or pertussis) is a contagious bacterial infection.
Croup (laryngo-tracheo-bronchitis) is a viral infection triggered by allergies or illnesses like RSV.
Stop spreading your lies here.
Croup is whopping cough renamed. Again, cause vaccines don't work. But do continue in your ignorance.
BFP 12/31/14, EDD 9/08/14 ~ Natural M/C 2/21/14 at 11.5 weeks
BFP 5/24/15 - EDD 2/4/16
It's not for what's the common version of pink eye. It's to protect baby from chlamydia and gonorrhea
Whooping cough has also been found to have a name change. It has been reported over and over that cases of whooping cough have been diagnosed in fully vaccinated children. In fact one report stated that vaccine failure has actually been admitted. Natural News (10) reported:
New research reported by Reuters reveals that whooping cough outbreaks are HIGHER among vaccinated children compared with unvaccinated children. This is based on a study led by Dr. David Witt, an infectious disease specialist at the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in San Rafael, California.
Doctors have known this for a very long time and there could be many more cases than we could ever imagine. Professionals have discovered that doctors have been diagnosing whooping cough as croup!.
Dr Viera Scheibner says:
In the Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1994, “Age Specific Incidence of Bacteriologically Confirmed Pertussis, between 1981 and 1991 – ten year follow-up”.(11) The majority of cases occurred in the most vulnerable age group below the age of one year in the most vaccinated children. Actually the majority of cases happened within the first four months. The vaccine is causing whooping cough. A lot of children develop whooping cough from the vaccine, but if they are vaccinated, it will be diagnosed as ‘croup’.
Bronwyn Hancock Vaccine Information Service agrees (12) stating:
“(2) The diagnostic guidelines given to doctors were supplemented with “No history of vaccination” when the vaccines were introduced. Even without these written guidelines, doctors are taught that vaccines are effective. The result is that upon seeing an illness in a child who has been vaccinated “against” it, doctors have been observed to conclude that the disease must be a different disease, so the case of the disease is not reported.
For example whooping cough gets called “croup” when it occurs in vaccinated children, and diphtheria gets called such names as “epiglotitis”, or, as in this case, described in “Raising a Vaccine Free Child”, by Wendy Lydall (2005, pg 68),
‘Her aunt had nursed diphtheria cases in Britain in the 1950s, and she said that her niece had the typical symptoms of diphtheria. The girl was flown by helicopter to a bigger hospital in Auckland, where they took a swab from her throat and confirmed diphtheria. When they learned that the girl was fully immunised, one of the doctors said to the mother, “Then it can’t be diphtheria.” They changed the diagnosis to bacterial tracheitis.’
So the teaching of doctors that vaccination will reduce number of cases *reported* of a disease is a self-fulfilling prophecy, regardless of how many cases there are in reality.”
The bottom line is parents are being duped into believing that vaccinations will protect children from deadly diseases when in fact they protect children from absolutely nothing. The truth is that more and more vaccinated children are becoming sick with the diseases that they have been vaccinated against and research is revealing that doctors are devising clever ways to cover this up. Not only this but the adverse reactions that children can have from the vaccines, are potentially worse than the diseases themselves. It seems to me that vaccinations are little more than a get rich quick scheme run by the pharmaceutical industries and endorsed by the governments. This is not only criminal it is fraud by any other name.
Semantics. They'll get you every time. (Unless, of course, you take two seconds to research what you think you're talking about).
*Croup =/= "whooping cough" (pertussis)
*stomach flu =/= influenza
*conjunctivitis = pink eye = something you can get from STDs
ETA: apparently I don't know how to proofread
Thanks for a more detailed clarification! (Still getting the ointment because I am a very "possible benefit outweighs possible risk" type person. Not that the opinions of here in favor of either would ever be convincing to change my mind. Just wanted to say thanks!)
BFP 12/31/14, EDD 9/08/14 ~ Natural M/C 2/21/14 at 11.5 weeks
BFP 5/24/15 - EDD 2/4/16
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/563a31c7e4b0411d306f0cee
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/103172/20151105/anti-vaccination-websites-using-inaccurate-distorted-science-to-push-their-case-study-finds.htm
While it's okay to do your homework, let's not confuse pseudoscience and science. More people drown when ice cream sales increase, but the third variable there is the weather. Similarly, getting sick around the time you get a vaccine does not mean you got sick from the vaccine. It's dangerous to perpetuate misunderstandings of health.
And virus =\= bacteria.
Here's another article with lots of evidence based facts and sources regarding the eye ointment.
Thank you. By giving people information to actually research and form their own opinions, people can give informed consent, which to me is very important. That's the only thing I will ever agree with Sharkgirl on.