December 2015 Moms

California Moms...SB277

Hi all, mainly a lurker here on the board but I do post occasionally if I have time! To all the California moms... what's your take on SB277?

I'm all for vaccinating, but definitely feeling a bit uncomfortable with the government mandating the what and when with such an open ended ability to add more without the public's say. Before the law was proposed, I was leaning towards a more delayed vaccination schedule and considering not doing a couple of them (like the vac for chicken pox, when I was a kid we just had chicken pox parties in kindergarten to get it out of the way) and also delaying hep B as it is mostly transmitted sexually so felt a newborn didn't need to get that right away.

Just wanted to get some others thoughts on what they think about it all since this will very likely be affecting our kids as they will be daycare/pre-school ready in just a few years or sooner. Hoping to not cause any drama as I do realize this can be a sensitive subject, just really looking for how other CA moms feel about this.. Thank you!

Re: California Moms...SB277

  • Wow I'm surprised no one has seen this! Lol maybe no one knows what SB277 is. I have a question: So in California you can't do you're own delayed vaccine schedule?? I'm in Texas but may move back to Cali someday so I'm just wondering. Because that would be my only concern since I would do all the recommended vaccines but I'd also like to do it on a delayed schedule so I'm just curious.

    image
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Loading the player...
  • @Marchmellow2 I guess I may not know because I don't live there but I had read you are allowed to do a delayed schedule as long as they're fully vaccinated before starting school and/or daycare, and with a doctors permission.

    I could be wrong though because it was just a random article I read on Facebook so I'd be interested to hear about this as well from people who know.

  • I've had a very difficult time finding out exactly what SB277 really says. Every article I've looked at is extremely biased either for or against it, which makes me hesitant to trust what they say. However this is my opinion on it from what I have read so far. 

    I do think that parents should vaccinate their children if it is possible. The people I know that are for SB277 seem to be making this decision mostly based on fear. Some of them have very legitimate fears because they have family members with compromised immune systems, young babies, or children not able to get vaccines for medical reasons. But I don't think we should try to control other people because we are afraid, and I am very uncomfortable with the government mandating vaccinations.
  • JmdavinJmdavin member
    edited July 2015
    My understanding is that you cannot enter any public or private daycare or school without ALL vaccinations. And now it is extremely hard to get any sort of medical exemption or PBE.

    So again with my hesitation against not vaccinating for hep B till later on (I didn't get this vaccination until I was an adult) I wouls have to homeschool unless all vaccinations were up to date. I plan on vaccinating on a delayed schedule, but I know people whose kids had severe reactions to some of the Vaccs (one had lasting seizures until she stopped with the sequential doses) and under the new law is not able to be exempted bc of the strictness of what qualifies for exemption.

    Here is a short video that explains https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8G-i05yl2c&sns=em

    Anyways, kind of scary. I just feel so conflicted bc while I totally believe in the good of vaccinations I do believe there are exceptions for every rule and not being able to make a decision on behalf of your children (without some pretty big consequences, not everyone can homeschool or wants to!) just seems wrong to me.

    *edited for typos
  • The law allows for medical exemptions: such as seizures, parents had reactions, and those who are have compromised immune systems. But personal belief isn't a medical exemption and that is what the bill is mainly getting rid of.

    Also the hep B vaccine is given at birth on the off chance that a doc or nurse has hep b and comes into contact with a part of baby that would allow transmission. While it is mainly transferred through sexual contact, there are other modes of contracting hep b and the shot at birth helps to fight against those.


    Formerly known as Kate08young
    August '18 Siggy April Showers:






    Me: 28 H: 24
    Married: 7/22/14
    Baby L: 8/4/2015  August 2015 Moms
    Baby E: 11/18/2016   December 2016 Moms
    TTC #3 08/2017  BFP 11/27/2017. 
    Twin B lost 11/22/2017, Twin A doing well. 


  • @Kate08Young yes there are still medical exemptions but the qualifying for such is much stricter. Even with video documentation of her daughter's seizures, she has still been unable to "prove" it was resulting from the vaccinations, even though they subsided after they discontinued the schedule.


  • Thank you for the links @lynem29 !
  • I live in CA and I'm not completely read up on the new law but it honestly does scare me. This seems like something the people should have decided and voted on and not the government making a decision and then forcing it on us. That I'm not cool with.

    I am for vaccines BUT I had a severe reaction to the chicken pox vaccine that will affect me for the rest of my life. That is one I have planned to opt out of for my children since chicken pox is not life threatening and considering my issue. But now I have no choice, unless I want to homeschool my children. And I'm not even sure if it would "meet the criteria" for exempting that one since drs I have spoken with essentially tell me that my issues are not from the vaccine and it was all just a strange coincidence of reactions immediately after the vaccine -_- It seems that Drs say that about vaccines often.

    Same with hepatitis B, it is not fair to force that on infants when the mother tests negative. I often feel like they just keep adding and adding vaccines to the required list to cover everyone who could possibly have some of these diseases when those that do not have the issue are now having our choices taken from us. I'm sorry, but I do not feel comfortable giving my newborn baby a vaccine for an STD. I don't care how safe the cdc says it is, it's MY newborn baby, *i* should make that decision.
    These vaccines I have issues with aren't even major, yet they're going to determine that my kids can't go to school because of chicken pox and a sexually transmitted disease?

    I'm in LA anyways where public schools are absolutely horrible (thanks again, ca government for caring about our kids!) so have been thinking about homeschooling when the time comes anyways. This is big for me too because I was homeschooled until highschool and vowed that I would never ever homeschool my children. Never say never I guess.
  • taysuntaysun member
    Even though I'm not 100% educated on this, I'm fairly certain Hep B is not just a sexually transmitted disease, it can be transmitted by blood like on tooth brushes. If a child unknowingly had it they could transfer it to other children through blood.
    I'm not from California and I will vaccinate my child. I'm not trying to tell others what to do but I think people should be fully informed about all risks.
  • @taysun yes I have also read that it can be transferred through blood or breast milk (if the mother has it). I read on a cdc website that a child could possibly get it from scraping his/her knee at the park. Well, besides that it is extremely paranoid to consider THAT is the reason every single child has to get the vaccine because of the 1 in a million chance they scrape their knee at the park in the exact spot that hepatitis B is laying around BUT my newborn baby will not be running around any parks or sharing a toothbrush or really coming in contact with anyone other than me and my close family and friends.

    I am not against the hepatitis B vaccine in general (although I never had it as a child and do not have hepatitis B now, I guess I got lucky running around the playground). I just do not think it is necessary for MY newborn baby. If a mother has HepB I think her baby should absolutely have the vaccine, maybe even if a close family member has it. But that is not the case with my family so why should it be forced on my baby?
  • jjmacejjmace member
    Hi ladies :) Southbay resident here. I just had an interesting realization (I thank you all for change of lens). This is actually the first time I've thought about SB277 through the lens of a parent, and for my child. Wow.
    The last 10 years my lens has been that of an educator, in an urban middle school with 1200 students. With out going into disgusting details... I've seen some gag worthy gross stuff. Related to vaccine schedule, whether or not I support it being mandated, I do believe it was being very abused. I think Cali has recognized its "herd immunity" is not intact and measures are being taken to try to secure that.
    As much as I like to think I can control or limit exposure of my lo to the population, it realistically isn't possible. There is a social responsibility here that many do not like, but nonetheless is necessary to protect entire communities from preventable diseases.
  • Hello, CA resident here, and lurker from Nov. 2015.  Im not well versed on SB277, but my husband is.  I am pro-vaccine, and agree that there shouldnt be a belief exemption for kids entering public school.  I dont want my 7 year old to bring home something, and give it to my one year old, or newborn this winter.  There are so many people that say that their rights are being taken away, and that the government is taking over, but I dont completely agree.  Its not fair to other families that one kid could bring measles to Disneyland, or school, and just pass it on to others because their parents dont believe in vaccines.  
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"