So quick back story, with my first I had horrible back pain in my third trimester, and went into labor with him posterior. I quickly got to 9, but then stopped and he did not desend anymore. After 18 hours of hard labor and pitosin to try and bring him down further, we decided on csection. My normal OB was not on call, so another DR delivered him. While on the table being sewed up, she told me everything looked great with my pelvis and saw nothing wrong which caused him to be stuck. Now, 3.5 months pregnant with baby 2, my regular DR says I'm "not a great candidate for VBAC" because they don't know why he was posterior in the first place. My MIL (who is a retired nurse and was there for the delivery) is pushing me to try VBAC. I'm so confused, I have no idea what to do.
Re: VBAC or not to VBAC?
More so, most babies that are OP before the onset of labor spontaneously rotate to an anterior position during labor. And most babies that are posterior at birth turn during that way during labor. So what you do prior to labor has no bearing on it whatsoever.
Sarah - 12/23/2008
Alex - 9/30/2011
"I say embrace the total geek in yourself and just enjoy it. Life is too short to be cool." - Shirley Manson, Garbage
On a personal note, it is a scary decision at least I thought it was... I thought of all the what if this happens or that... but honestly if you really look into VBACs they are much safer than a repeat CS and the chances of something bad happening are like 1% or something really low. Having a VBAC was seriously easier for me and most women in regards to recovery. I'm currently 4 weeks PP now and have been working out for the past 3 and moving and haven't had any restrictions after the first week of rest.