This isn't too significant, but I've wondered if anyone else has an opinion on my unstudied theory.
My MIL has always had small babies, and never ate very healthy. My own mom always had bigger babies and has always had a pretty hardy, nutricious diet.
So if I eat less nutritious will that actually effect baby's size? Or does it depends on genetics?
If you ladies have info that contradicts my theory , feel free to share! I'm just curious if there's a general trend.
Re: Nutritious food --> big baby?
Spelling was never my favorite subject, ga!
Junk foods may undernourish baby causing lower weight.
But there are so many other variables to take into consideration: did they have severe morning sickness, did they smoke, did they take drugs (legal or illegal), drink alcohol, etc.? Maybe the dates were off for both of them, maybe the one with bigger babies always went over her due date and the other was early? Way too many variables.
Neither of them had smoked or consumed drugs or alcohol.
My MIL always have birth before her DD, and my mom usually gave birth after the DD. But even mom's smallest baby was a pound or two bigger than my MIL's!
Honestly, I'm hoping for a small baby. Granted I'm not going to avoid nutrition for that reason, hee hee...
Anyway just focus on healthy momma, healthy baby. The weight is a surprise you find out at birth and can't be controlled.
My other SIL is vegetarian but splurged a bit on fun things and both of her boys were 9 pounders. She was a little more relaxed on her diet with the second, he weighed a little less than the first.
I know it's anecdotal but I think it's interesting.