Any mommas out there know if there is any truth to second labor & delivery being significantly shorter than the first? My midwife today said that second babies are born in usually half the length of time that it took to deliver the first. I'm hoping some ladies can share the truth in this statement because I'm wishing my second daughter will just walk out of my lady parts. I don't want to be away from my first daughter for too long!
Re: Length of labor...
Married 03/18/10
DS #2 Born 05/19/11
DS #3 Due 07/26/15
Then came a miscarriage March '11
Then came a baby in the baby carriage May 16, 12
Waiting on our second little peanut!
of active labor. That means when you have to stop in your tracks when a
contraction hits, and nothing can distract you from the pain. You
can't talk, you can't type, you can't do anything except concentrate on
your contraction.
Married 03/18/10
DS #2 Born 05/19/11
DS #3 Due 07/26/15
With DD, I went to the hospital around 3am on Sunday morning. I had gotten up to pee then and had so much pain and pressure I couldn't walk. I was monitored for an hour and sent home in early labor. That day felt pretty normal, though. And then at 3am Monday morning, my water broke. We went to the hospital but my contractions weren't regular so they gave me Pitocin. She was born at 3pm. So I was at the hospital for 12 hours, but if you count from when I went to the hospital initially on Sunday, then I was in labor for 36 hours (or more).
With DS, I woke up Sunday morning around 6am and went to the bathroom. Noticed I lost my mucus plug. Contractions started shortly after. Went to the hospital around 3pm, he was born at 3am the next day. Also had some pitocin with him, as contractions were irregular.
So with DS it appeared shorter but felt longer. Also with both, the Pitocin sped things up.
J -- 9/04
L -- 11/10
E -- 7/15