January 2015 Moms

Toddlers & Technology

2»

Re: Toddlers & Technology

  • This past weekend we were playing in the pool and the pool noodle was, in turns, an elephant trunk, a submarine, a car, and a fishing pole.

    The imagination of children is amazing
    image
  • Loading the player...
  • Fyi Steve jobs was a shitty father
  • BookitBoo said:

    We FaceTime a lot with family out of state -- every night we call someone. I'm pretty thankful for a smartphone for that purpose because DS gets to interact with family he wouldn't otherwise get to see.

    Was the 8 year old reading on his kindle?


    Definitely not reading. It was an angry birds racing thing I believe. I think he probably doesn't even know you can read on it
  • Ooh no sorry ftms have I offended u.

    But seriously have a couple kids and u will want all the tools in your arsenal to occupy the little beasties when you do selfish shit. What did ppl in the old days do? Kept to the homestead and beat their children. No thanks I'll keeps iphone
  • I said it's ok in moderation. I have a smartphone and we both have tablets. DS is only allowed to use them as a last resort during travel (air travel or car travel) after we've exhausted all other options. I normally bring a lot of activities, snacks etc so it's around hour 6 of 8 that the smartphone/tablet is brought out. I have a handful of educational apps that I downloaded for that specific purpose. On weekend mornings he's allowed to watch one episode of Daniel Tiger. Sometimes we watch it on the tv through the wii, and sometimes he watches it on the iPad. 

    Just like with my normal camera, he likes to take pictures with my phone - I see no problem in that. However, he knows that he is not allowed to use my phone or either of the tablets whenever he wants. 

    My parents let us play games on the computer from a young age, but we were limited to 30 minutes a day, the same with tv, one show a day. I think we'll probably enforce similar rules with our children. 
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker BabyFruit Ticker
  • Honestly I think we're starting to talk about two different things here.

    The AAP has a recommendation about no screen time before age 2. That's one issue.

    Now we're starting to talk about not having internet in the home, and kids not having a "leg up" when they're old enough to be in school? To me, this is a separate issue than what I interpreted to be the original concern - parents perceived as using technology as a "crutch".
    True about the AAP but that doesn't mean screen time prior to age 2 is going to damage your child.  Mine really had 0 interest in TV before 2 (trust me, we tried when flying at 21 months and it was an epic disaster. I only WISHED he cared about something on a screen!).  

    I think the OP and subsequent posts are all related in that technology CAN be used as a crutch but just the pure existence of it in a household (such as having smartphones) doesn't create a problem in itself.  Furthermore, jumping from just having it to actually letting your child (of any age) use it doesn't translate into a problem necessarily (or a crutch) unless a parent lets it become a crutch.  I think a lot of people here just explained that technology does not have to be a crutch of any kind but, instead, can actually be a useful tool (beyond occupying your kid while at the doctor's office).
    DS #1  2/2010
    image
  • Honestly I think we're starting to talk about two different things here.

    The AAP has a recommendation about no screen time before age 2. That's one issue.

    Now we're starting to talk about not having internet in the home, and kids not having a "leg up" when they're old enough to be in school? To me, this is a separate issue than what I interpreted to be the original concern - parents perceived as using technology as a "crutch".
    True about the AAP but that doesn't mean screen time prior to age 2 is going to damage your child.  Mine really had 0 interest in TV before 2 (trust me, we tried when flying at 21 months and it was an epic disaster. I only WISHED he cared about something on a screen!).  

    I think the OP and subsequent posts are all related in that technology CAN be used as a crutch but just the pure existence of it in a household (such as having smartphones) doesn't create a problem in itself.  Furthermore, jumping from just having it to actually letting your child (of any age) use it doesn't translate into a problem necessarily (or a crutch) unless a parent lets it become a crutch.  I think a lot of people here just explained that technology does not have to be a crutch of any kind but, instead, can actually be a useful tool (beyond occupying your kid while at the doctor's office).
    Uh, yeah. Maybe you missed my earlier post.

    My point remains that we're having multiple conversations here. Some are talking about young kids. Some are citing examples about school age kids.
    "uh, yeah." Maybe I did. Maybe you missed my post about internet (doubting it since you referenced the internet, but maybe someone else did the same). But perhaps you're missing the correlation altogether... that, at any age, having access to technology doesn't deprive or create a crutch.  It's about parenting.
    DS #1  2/2010
    image
  • Honestly I think we're starting to talk about two different things here.

    The AAP has a recommendation about no screen time before age 2. That's one issue.

    Now we're starting to talk about not having internet in the home, and kids not having a "leg up" when they're old enough to be in school? To me, this is a separate issue than what I interpreted to be the original concern - parents perceived as using technology as a "crutch".
    True about the AAP but that doesn't mean screen time prior to age 2 is going to damage your child.  Mine really had 0 interest in TV before 2 (trust me, we tried when flying at 21 months and it was an epic disaster. I only WISHED he cared about something on a screen!).  

    I think the OP and subsequent posts are all related in that technology CAN be used as a crutch but just the pure existence of it in a household (such as having smartphones) doesn't create a problem in itself.  Furthermore, jumping from just having it to actually letting your child (of any age) use it doesn't translate into a problem necessarily (or a crutch) unless a parent lets it become a crutch.  I think a lot of people here just explained that technology does not have to be a crutch of any kind but, instead, can actually be a useful tool (beyond occupying your kid while at the doctor's office).
    Uh, yeah. Maybe you missed my earlier post.

    My point remains that we're having multiple conversations here. Some are talking about young kids. Some are citing examples about school age kids.
    "uh, yeah." Maybe I did. Maybe you missed my post about internet (doubting it since you referenced the internet, but maybe someone else did the same). But perhaps you're missing the correlation altogether... that, at any age, having access to technology doesn't deprive or create a crutch.  It's about parenting.

    I'm getting annoyed because you think I said that or implied that, when I very clearly copped to handing my son my iPhone in the Costco line yesterday. My post, for the third time, was that people are discussing different things - hence the discord. If it's not abundantly clear, the term "crutch" was referring to what I perceived the OP's original post to be about.

    Senseless derailment of my original point.
    Seriously, you're completely misreading or misunderstanding my post. I didn't even see your post about Costco so I have no idea what you're talking about there.  I hand my kid (and said it in previous posts) my phone for distraction from time to time as well, so if that's what you are saying you did, then we do the same thing (sometimes, I guess). I'm not calling that a crutch at all.  That's survival as a parent. I was referring to the OP talking about how her niece has to watch Mickey and her parents give in - THAT is a crutch.  That's making life easier for the parent 24/7 by just giving into the kid. And I get that the OP was talking about how she doesn't want that to happen to her kid and I don't blame her.  My point (to your point) was that it doesn't have to be all or nothing with technology and I think a lot of posts here cited examples of how and why technology doesn't need to be an all or nothing scenario in order to keep it from becoming a daily crutch for parents.
    DS #1  2/2010
    image
  • I didn't read the comments yet, but here's my two cents...
    I'm not a fan of any screen time before two years of age, but that's simply not feasible nowadays. My boys do not play with our phones (although they love looking through the photos, but I don't allow them often), they don't use computers or tablets, and they are occasionally allowed to watch a tv show (usually as a reward for something; maybe 2 hours/week, divided into two or three increments). We don't watch anything that jumps around from subject to subject because I want them to develop a good attention span (their favorites are Thomas the Train and Curious George), and we read storybooks often (multiple/daily).
    All that being said, I am not opposed to children using technology because that is simply the world in which they are living. When they are a little older, we will absolutely use computers games, apps, etc that are educational.
  • banana2020banana2020 member
    edited September 2014
    I won't keep going back & forth because my point (and opinion) is that there are multiple conversations here but that are all related while your point seems to be the opposite. We just disagree.  I understand your post. It's just that you don't see how separate issues can all be related even if different, yet I do (and others obviously do too or else they wouldn't be talking about it).  

    Edited out the snark b/c it's just silly for me to go there. Sorry.
    DS #1  2/2010
    image

  • I've seen a lot of studies recently regarding early childhood development and the effects of technology on attention spans. I feel VERY strongly that children under the age of two should be engaged in other ways. Even Steve Jobs himself limted technology for his children and so do the developers of the apps children use. I don't own an ipad or tablet and will not be buying one for my child because I don't think it's a necessity. I do think that children should be introduced to technology in limited amounts after the age of two but it should not be in a way that enhances learning, not simply to pacify them. I don't judge others for their parenting, as they say "not my circus, not my monkeys" You can judge me if you will, stms. However, people said a lot of "just waits" about pregnancy that have not rang true for me.

    @TXUltraRunner - you wouldn't happen to have links to any of those studies would you? I would lvoe to use them to support my "no tech" stance with the grand parents and the like until after LO is 2
    @ladyamanuet There's tons of stuff out there if you google toddlers and technology. Here's some stuff from sources I consider to be reputable. 

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0193397312000445

    https://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2013/10/29/228125739/what-to-know-about-babies-and-screen-time-kids-screens-electronics






    ****************************************************
    TTC since August 2011 Me: 31 DH: 33
    May-September 2012: Monitored cycles with Letrozole
    October 2012: Cancelled IUI
    April 2014: IVF #1 w/ ICSI
    ER: 4/15 ET: 4/20 Beta #1 4/29: 54 Beta#2 5/1: 90 
    1st ultrasound: 5/13 (6w1d): HB 103 2nd Ultrasound: 5/22 (7w3d) HB 151
    *********************************************************

    image


  • Okay I do have a few more things to say since I keep getting notified about the posts on this discussion.

    I don't know if anyone has noticed the name of the thread... TODDLERS & TECHNOLOGY. Not school aged children & technology. I'm saying I will not allow my TODDLER to use technology. Will she be allowed to watch tv? Yes, will she be allowed to watch tv on a handheld device? No. I also never said "never will I ever" allow her to use technology. I will still own a computer and iPad to use when needed, I will not be allowing my daughter to use them until my husband and I deem appropriate as I said previously multiple times.

    I think people think assume that because I feel this way about toddlers using technology that I'm judging their style of parenting. I will be a SAHM and I will be spending as much time enriching my daughter with the very activities that my parents used for me to prepare her for school. If you cant be a SAHM and have to use these tools for your children, that's fine you have to do what works for you. I'm not trying to offend anyone or piss anyone off by saying that I don't want to use these things until we think she's ready.

    It's funny how people twist your words around on these things. I forgot that having an opinion on this forum is a big no no if it's on something that the majority of the women on here won't agree with.
  • @ChelCChargers - Calm the heck down, lady.  You started a conversation, people are participating.  The only one getting worked up is you.  No one is has accused you (that I've seen) of judging anyone for making different choices - people are just explaining their views, agreeing or disagreeing with others, and moving on.  It's called a conversation, and not everyone always has the same perspective.

    And if you don't want notifications, don't start a post.  People aren't paging you intentionally to specifically agree or disagree with what you have said - they're participating in the conversation.
    Ditto the above. I don't think anyone is worked up. Just speaking their opinions on the matter and explaining why they feel the way they do.

    And a big thumbs up to the bolded. 
    Stephanie Ella ~ 6/15/2012
    image
  • Okay I do have a few more things to say since I keep getting notified about the posts on this discussion. I don't know if anyone has noticed the name of the thread... TODDLERS & TECHNOLOGY. Not school aged children & technology. I'm saying I will not allow my TODDLER to use technology. Will she be allowed to watch tv? Yes, will she be allowed to watch tv on a handheld device? No. I also never said "never will I ever" allow her to use technology. I will still own a computer and iPad to use when needed, I will not be allowing my daughter to use them until my husband and I deem appropriate as I said previously multiple times. I think people think assume that because I feel this way about toddlers using technology that I'm judging their style of parenting. I will be a SAHM and I will be spending as much time enriching my daughter with the very activities that my parents used for me to prepare her for school. If you cant be a SAHM and have to use these tools for your children, that's fine you have to do what works for you. I'm not trying to offend anyone or piss anyone off by saying that I don't want to use these things until we think she's ready. It's funny how people twist your words around on these things. I forgot that having an opinion on this forum is a big no no if it's on something that the majority of the women on here won't agree with.
    Well, a couple things...

    You said this in your OP (I apologize in advance as I'm sure fonts will look ridiculous here):

    "I see this situation a lot out in public (I work in retail, so I see it everyday), small children sitting in their strollers, mouths open watching or playing something on a tablet or on their parents smartphone. So infatuated with what's happening on the screen that they don't see anything else going on"

    So to that, I say that I'm sure you do see that a lot. But who's to say that this is the norm for that parent?  You're just getting a snapshot of that parent's entire day, not their whole parenting style. So yeah, it kind of feels like you're judging OR assuming that all parents that you see with kids like this must be like your niece's parents... just throwing a device in their child's face to make their own lives easier.  That's most definitely not the case for me, but you very well catch me on a day when I'm at the grocery store trying desperately to finish up shopping for a 40 person gathering and my kid is NOT enjoying the 1.5 hours in the store.  That's the case for a lot of parents and it's hard enough to be a parent, never mind wondering if someone is looking at you with a side eye thinking that you always throw technology at your 2 year old to keep them entertained vs. enriching them in other ways.

    And to the post you put above about being a SAHM parent. See the bolded part, particularly the part in italics.  You are (intentionally or not) stating that if someone is a SAHM that they should never have any need to have a moment to herself to pee, shower, start dinner, etc.  I do both - my kid is with me all day and I work all day. A huge luxury and blessing, but it doesn't come without its challenges.  Let me tell you, even SAHMs have things to do outside of parenting their child for 12 hours a day (I work outside of the home but I do WFH on occasion).  Sure, that's the priority.  But there are other things to do and parents may find it a bit peaceful for all involved to allow a child to watch a show for 20 minutes while they peel some potatoes and throw a roast into the oven.  It's OK.  It's OK if it's not for you, but many parents do it in moderation.

    Lastly, you specifically asked for opinions in your OP and you got them.


    DS #1  2/2010
    image
  • @ChelCChargers‌ this is an intentional page. You'll get notified anytime someone posts in your thread, or anyone 'pages' you like this...so slow your roll.


    All I'm saying is what you deem neccessary now, as a mom to be, is VERY different from what you may deem neccessary a year from now when you have a year and a half year old and have to drive 10 hours in the car. Maybe you'll never change your stance, or maybe you'll quickly change your mind. It really doesn't matter, You have absolutely no way of foretelling the future. And I couldn't care less what people think of my parenting skills, especially regarding something so silly IMO.

    For me, the toddler/school age technology is pretty well tied up, since children don't spring from the womb knowing how to operate an iPad, but earlier access can affect how they interact with technology later in life.
    image
  • @southernyankeegirl‌ I am completely and entirely calm.

    I understand that my beliefs are unpopular amongst a lot of moms on here and that's fine but saying things along the lines of the OP said this because of this but what they're saying isn't at all what I said, rather an interpretation of what they think I said.

    I'm not getting rid of my smartphone so that my daughter doesn't have behavioral issues, as you said in a previous response. My plan has always been to get rid of my smartphone when my plan was up next year, regardless of if I was having my daughter or not It's not something I find necessary. Now that I know I'm going to be having a child I find this decision more important.

    Someone said that I have a lack of self control and getting rid of my smartphone so that my daughter won't be exposed to it early on is a personal problem. Thanks but I don't have any problems with not using my smartphone or any technology.

    A lot of the conversation going on now has gone completely off topic from what I posted in the original post. Not reading what I had originally said, being that my husband and I will decide when to introduce technology. People are reading the post and thinking I'm going to hold my child back from learning because I won't allow her to EVER use technology.
  • My daughter is about two and a half, and we use smartphones, iPads, and TV.

    We use iPads for her primarily for FaceTime with her grandparents and aunt who live in the UK and Spain.  If we didn't, she wouldn't know what they look like.  And I can tell you, my MIL loves it when my daughter "tickles" her.  It's an amazing interactive tool that I didn't have as a kid and really wish I did.  My in laws get to see my daughter grow up, and she will ask to talk to Auntie Sarah as she brings over the iPad.  I'd rather my daughter and my SIL have a bond than refuse to allow tech/screen time.  We also have a lot of great puzzles on the iPad for her--puzzles that are free, as opposed to the ones we'd have to purchase.  

    TV is a treat she--and we--get when we need to fix dinner/get ready for work in the morning/drive 9 hours.  We don't use it a lot, but more than I'd prefer, but she's in no way addicted to it.

    As far as the phone, she knows it's mine/my husband's and that it takes pictures.  

    I'm sure if you saw us in a restaurant and I pulled out the screen so she could watch a Dora episode so I could talk to a friend, you might judge us.  But my daughter is a great, happy, energetic, smart child who occasionally gets to watch a show or do a puzzle on a screen.  It's what works for us, and that's our decision.  If you want to let your child watch more/less, that's yours.  Don't judge me for my decision and I won't judge you for yours.

    mm 2/17/11 * dd born 4/20/12 * bo 1/3/14 * edd 1/211/15 

    image



  • And to add also, I didn't say that I didn't want responses. I understand that this a discussion and you are
    allowed to talk about how you feel about a topic. I don't think half the people have even read or understood what I've said is all. I see a lot of posters jumping to conclusions and assuming that what I've said means something else.

    I'm not bashing anyone else's parenting, you don't need to defend your decision to allow your toddlers or children to use technology. I'm not just standing around out in public judging people for allowing their children to use technology.

    I appreciate when people respond telling me their opinion, but when you state your opinion and go on to tell me mine is wrong that's just not cool.
  • @aerotigergirl‌ I don't think there's anything wrong with sitting in front of the TV and knowing that the TV is where you watch cartoons. Rather than being able to watch TV wherever you go or whatever room you're in. There's a time and a place for that and to me that's in front of the TV.

    All I've said is that I will be replacing any activities that can be Downloaded in the App Store with activities that don't involve technology. Being a SAHM has nothing to do with that decision, if I wasn't planning on staying home I would still implement these rules. I just simply don't want technology in her life until she's ready. I didn't mean for that statement to come off as offensive to anyone. But I can see what you're saying.
  • Personally, mickey mouse, sophia, chuggington and doc mcstuffins are my saving grace some days. My husband and I are on opposite schedules, he works 4-12 and I work 8-6. So when I get up in the morning to get ready there is no one else to help me out (hubby needs to sleep because he gets in so late) so I stick her in her play pen with a bottle and the tv goes on. She also has toys and books in the play pen which she plays with but thats how I get through my morning routine. When I get home, once again, while making dinner she gets to watch tv. I'm really excited for my kids to be so close in age so once this lo is old enough they can entertain each other while I do this. As far as the phone, we use it to call my mom every night on facetime. And its amazing ;) If she is throwing a tantrum when we go for a walk at night (which I try to do daily and its always after we head back home from the park that she starts to get antsy and cry) if singing abc's etc. doesn't work I get out her counting animals app that sings and she will play with that for a little bit. She's not glued to it and most of the time she is just pressing the home button like someone else mentioned but I see no harm. She should probably not watch as much tv but most of the time she is running around the room with her toys while its on and its more of a distraction in the back ground, but as a working mom who has no help in the a.m. or evenings, I do what works. My cousin brings a dvd player/movie thing whenever we go to restaurants for her kids to watch...I find that to be obnoxious and wouldn't do it for my daughter. But she does what works. And she like me has her kids by herself at nights and in the a.m. so I'm guessing she just needs the break. Idk. I try not to judge but before I had my daughter that is all I did...now I understand that its a balancing act. I'm not saying anyone who says they won't use technology will once they have kids because its easier, I'm just saying I am really happy that its around because sometimes a girl needs a few minutes to herself (and its really adorable when she sings and dances to the songs) 
  • I didn't read all of the responses. But thought I'd put my opinion in the mix.

    DS is nearly one. I don't let him typically use my phone. He loves to carry it around, probably because its mine and sometimes we call people or Skype with my parents. Sometimes I'll open a drawing app for him. My mom will show him pictures on her phone sometimes, and she will say like "who's that? That's paw paw!"

    He also had LOTS of toys that make noise and play music. He loves music. He loves to dance. But mostly he runs around and picks up any piece of trash off the floor that I missed.

    The TV is on a lot, but he doesn't watch it. If a song starts to play he will dance. But mostly the TV is on so I don't fall asleep.

    As a 1 year old he is a pretty smart kid. He started walking at 8 months. Started climbing at 9. And started moving things or usings to get other things that are normally out of his reach. He knows what a lot of words mean, and he is starting to say some, although he associates all dogs as "beaux" which is our dogs name.

    I think technology if used right can be a great tool for helping babies of any age learn. Do I think that you should constantly use technology to distract your kids? No. But do I get why some people do? Yes. If I could get my child to sit and watch a 30 minute show once day I totally would. That little guy is so active and I to everything.

    Do I think that technology always needs to used for educational purposes? No. It's OK to let kids have fun. Even if it's more than you know you should. I still think it's OK.
  • ChelCChargers  - I actually think you handled the responses pretty well.  I don't knock you for defending your decision when you feel like people are judging your decision.  But that's basically what a lot of people did (defend) when they felt like maybe you were judging those parents in your retail environment with the devices in their kid's faces. KWIM?  It really is just a snippit of a very LONG day for most parents and there's no telling how the rest of the day goes.

    DS #1  2/2010
    image
  • I'm a SAHM. You know how often I've read my kid a book? Like...10 times. He wants to play with the book. He wants to touch it, and chew it and throw it, and try to rip it apart. Its pretty enriching as he is learning about the object.

    TV shows can be enriching as well. A lot of what we watch is the Disney Jr shows that teach colors, shapes, problem solving, and things of that nature. We also watch Phineas and Ferb a lot. DH and DS love it.

    As a SAHM I can tell you that toddlers are EXHAUSTING. I'm not saying that there is no point in doing "enriching activities." But toddlers are wiggly. They move a lot. They want to play in their own way. Its not always feasible to plan out activities, and then have then actually do them. This is in direct response to the doing enriching activities. I'll also note its kind of a lot judgey to insinuate that working mothers are not capable of doing enriching activities or that they somehow need more "tools" or technology to keep their kid entertained. If anything they probably could handle doing an activity better than I could as I spend all day listening to my toddler cry every time I say no.
  • As a first time mom, I am really trying to enter this whole roller coaster without too many "I'll never" or absolutes.  Of course, I have my "ideal" situations/solutions, but being around kids my entire life, I know that's not always feasible, and that's okay.

    I grew up with educators as parents and TV time was super limited.  We had one of the first Apple computers with the green writing and I played pong...and later Where in the World is Carmen San Diego when they upgraded.  I was able to watch 30 minutes of TV a day and never had a TV in my room until my college roommate brought one.  However, I am fully aware that life 30 years ago is quite different from today.  Of course, I would love to sit back and claim that my child won't be given my iphone ever...but I think I would be setting myself up for disaster.

    Just like anything, we will have limits on the things we let our kids use.  My limits might be more strict than another parent and I'm okay with that...or maybe (gasp) someone might be more strict than me.  I think everything in moderation will be our goal.  When will I let my kid use my iphone, sit in front of the TV to a watch a show, etc...NEVER (just kidding)- I am not 100% sure...I'd love to put an age on it, but we'll just have to see how it goes. 


      BabyFetus Ticker
     

     

     

  • Wow, I've finally found an issue I don't care about. Ha!
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"