I'll start off by saying I have nothing wrong with the ones who want circumcision. But for me, I'd prefer not to.
I'm having a boy and I will not be circumcising ... even though DH is [circumcised]. As long as DH helps baby keep it clean and shows him later on then I have no problem NOT cutting off 1/3 of it. The IL have a problem with it and don't believe that DH actually has 4 holes - still open - due to the clamps used during his circumcision. I have several more reasons, but the only reason people tell me that I need to get my baby cir. is because it's in the Bible that all boys should be. Something from 4000 years ago ,,, won't convince me because so much has changed. We don't sacrifice animals like they did 4000 years ago, do we?
Re: Here is a good question: Anyone thinking of not circumsizing?
I'll start off by saying I have nothing wrong with the ones who want circumcision. But for me, I'd prefer not to.
I'm having a boy and I will not be circumcising ... even though DH is [circumcised]. As long as DH helps baby keep it clean and shows him later on then I have no problem NOT cutting off 1/3 of it. The IL have a problem with it and don't believe that DH actually has 4 holes - still open - due to the clamps used during his circumcision. I have several more reasons, but the only reason people tell me that I need to get my baby cir. is because it's in the Bible that all boys should be. Something from 4000 years ago ,,, won't convince me because so much has changed. We don't sacrifice animals like they did 4000 years ago, do we?