DH and I have been butting heads about this all weekend, fueled by the fact that my nephew starts kindergarten today, he is 6, he will be 7 in early December.
I think this is nuts, to delay his school start by that long, DH sees nothing wrong with it since his argument is that he was young for his class and always felt behind in milestones, sports and such. DH has a September birthday so he started kindergarten when he was 4 and turned 5 that month. There is a middle ground here, why didn't they start our nephew last year when he was 5 going on 6, this kid will turn 19 when he is a few months into his senior year of high school. I think it is extreme to wait this long.
The arguing about it stems from DH saying that absolutely we are going to keep our DS out of school and start him as late as possible (mostly for sports reason is my DH motivation). Which I completely disagree with.
Question for mom's with school age kids, is this sort of delay allowed in your school district? can you see any reason why this would benefit a child (who is normal with all development)? Thoughts!
Re: Opinions on delaying school start year
I am frustrated enough because DS's preschool just changed to where he has to be 2.5 to start so he can't start until November. He is the only one this effects and I feel like he is getting left behind in those two months. :-)
Fred Rogers
I am confused about the rules on our county website, it doesnt seem like this is allowed (but obviously it is happening). Does this make sense to you:
"Under the compulsory attendance laws of Virginia, a child whose fifth birthday falls on or before September 30 of a given year must be enrolled in school for that school year. However, a child's attendance may be delayed for one year if, in the opinion of the parent or guardian, the child is not mentally, physically, or emotionally prepared to attend school. "
Fred Rogers
His Dad is not that coordinated either, and my DH is the athletic phenom of the In-laws family (not my SIL).
I feel weird asking SIL about it though.
Our oldest is only 3 and is just starting preschool this month so we aren't there yet but his birthday is in early July. His preschool offers as prek class at age 5 but you can also choose to have your child start actual kindergarten at that age.
I guess for us we will see how each child does in school. For me if they seem ready for kindergarten why not send them but with our firsts birthday being early July he would be one of he youngest kids in the class, so I see my husbands point as well. It also bothers me that his cousins who are the same age who aren't held back could be an issue as they get older (staying back/not smart enough?) or making friends and then them moving into kindergarten and our child staying behind. But anyway the following year he will have just turned 6 for kindergarten which I think is fine too (I think your nephew almost being 7 at the start of kindergarten is really late!) so yeah basically I am not sure what we will do yet but I think it'll depend on each child.
Personally, I disagreed with this policy. The trouble with those 2 boys in particular is that their body's and strength were so beyond their peers, and their skills would have befit 1st graders.
However, as an August birthday myself I can say with absolute certainly that I should have started a year later. Not just for the fact that I was 17 when I moved into college dorms, was the last to get my license etc but because of my own struggles with Math and logical reasoning. Those parts of the brain are some of the last to develop and can happen between 7-11. As someone who was probably closer to 11 than 7 in that development I have always been at a huge disadvantage and it has impacted me greatly. After 6th grade I was already behind to the point of not coming back. It wasn't that I couldn't eventually get it, it's just that complex math happened before I was ready to think so abstractly. That extra year may have been the difference between going to a state school vs and an Ivy League, a better fit for a career (I always wished I could have been an architect or in medicine), etc. Oh well
My point is.. It all comes down to the reason and using logic
As someone who went through most of my school as the youngest in the class (I skipped a grade in primary school, so I was always a year younger), I don't think it affected anything for me. I was always in class with kids who were a year older, and I just got interested in the things they liked.
I am not sure about the physical end of things... I was never blessed in the agility or physical prowess end of things, so I always sucked at PE anyway. Even as an adult, when I was really fit and thin, I would still trip over my own feet.
I think that this delay is awfully extreme. I would never delay my child that much from joining in school. I kind of think it is going to be more detrimental because he's going to be conspicuously older than the other children....
Monster Truck (It's a GIRL!) is due 19/02/2015!
Regardless, 2 years is a poor choice unless there is something huge we are missing. Nevertheless, the point of IEP's helping a child along without having to hold them back is true. There are ways of augmenting a child's learning within the classroom. But it seems that the reasoning had nothing to do with the child and more to do with a parent wanting to live vicariously through undocumented athletic ability. Just silly.
By start time, he was comfortable with the language and could communicate with his peers. He was near the cutoff, so the difference was never that great. Kid ended up graduating from MIT, so in his case it wasn't detrimental.
But starting them late for the potential sports/physical advantage? No.
IVF FET - BFP, due April 2017