An old friend posted a warning on Facebook about going past your due date...she has two friends who had stillborn babies, one 5 days late, 1 seven. Tragic, yes, but I wasn't aware risks were any higher until 2 weeks past due. Aren't due dates inexact (not sure if that's a word) anyway? It kind of bothers me that she's posting a "warning" without any facts behind it. I only made it to 35 weeks, so I have no experience with those last weeks. What are your thoughts/knowledge on the topic?
Re: Higher mortality rate past due date?? Tirigger warning
Here is the ACOG literature:
https://m.acog.org/~/media/For Patients/faq069.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20140823T2310163400
I believe it was at our 16 week ultrasound they started talking about how big he was, his head in particular. As time went in my OB said she was concerned about shoulder dystocia if we went much past EDD because of his size. She swept my membranes at 39w 4d, and I went into labor that night.
I'm not sure why its not clicky.....
::hugs MD::
I went overdue, and I worked very closely with my OB to determind how long it was "safe." I was induced at 10 days overdue (I knew exactly when I ovulated). My NST and ultrasound started to show that things were just starting to be "not ideal" - and I actually remember reading MD's story, so I was OK with being induced when I was. I didn't want to be induced too early. There was meconium in the water, but my hospital was great, and had a nicu team right there when she was born - they took her right away and sucked everything out to minimize any potential damage.
My family tends to carry long, so my "anecdotal evidence" is that carrying long is not always bad. My brother was 17 days late! (and he was the second!).