Has anyone had measurements on an ultrasound come back way off from one another? Especially related to small head size? This little one's head is measuring 4 weeks behind the femur length. Femur are in the 80th, AC in the 62nd and HC in the 12th. In fact, all 3 head measurements were really low. That leads me to believe the possibility of error is lower because the tech had to take 3 separate measurements and all 3 are low.
2nd Question: Anyone had their amniotic fluid high or borderline high?
Ps- Yes, I have talked to my doctor. Doctor expressed some concern especially over amniotic fluid but could not provide an answer. Doctor said maybe the measurements on head were an error but since thinking about it and the 3 separate measurements, I am not convinced that this is a likely scenario.
IF DX: DOR & Fragile X pre-mutation carrier
2011: FSH 13.3 & E 99; AMH 0.54
2nd FSH 6.2 E 40's AFC: 8
BFP from Clomid/IUI ~ Pre-e and IUGR during pregnancy ~ DS born 9/4/12
Feb./March 2013: AMH less than 0.16 (undectable) and AFC = 4;
BFP from supps ~ DS#2 due May 2014
May 2014 January Siggy Challenge:


Re: Another anyone else thread.
I think that answered one of your questions. I was a little confused if you were asking about the repeated measurements all being different.
I meant where the range from one measurement to the next in the same ultrasound is so great. As in the femur are at the 80th and head at the 12th and head measuring 4 weeks behind the femurs. It just seems like that is too big of a range. When my son had iugr the abdomen was 4-5 weeks behind the head and that was a BIG deal. But we don't worry when the head is 4 weeks behind the femurs? That seems to me to be more alarming than him being skinny!
2011: FSH 13.3 & E 99; AMH 0.54 2nd FSH 6.2 E 40's AFC: 8
BFP from Clomid/IUI ~ Pre-e and IUGR during pregnancy ~ DS born 9/4/12
Feb./March 2013: AMH less than 0.16 (undectable) and AFC = 4;
BFP from supps ~ DS#2 due May 2014
May 2014 January Siggy Challenge:
And having all measurements behind is symmetrical iugr. Symmetrical iugr is more commonly seen in chromosomal issues (e.g. dwarfism) or where the child is just genetically small.
But for just the head to be behind is not iugr. Overall, his weight is in the 60th percentile so he isn't even borderline. Only his head measurements are small. All three were somewhere between 2-4 weeks behind everything else. And we don't have small heads in our family. DS is at the 99th percentile for big heads.
2011: FSH 13.3 & E 99; AMH 0.54 2nd FSH 6.2 E 40's AFC: 8
BFP from Clomid/IUI ~ Pre-e and IUGR during pregnancy ~ DS born 9/4/12
Feb./March 2013: AMH less than 0.16 (undectable) and AFC = 4;
BFP from supps ~ DS#2 due May 2014
May 2014 January Siggy Challenge:
I have a follow up ultrasound next week and then an appointment with OB. FX it was an ultrasound error.
I think with the big head they worry about hydrocephalus (fluid on the brain). My DS has a head in the 99th percentile, though, and is ok.
2011: FSH 13.3 & E 99; AMH 0.54 2nd FSH 6.2 E 40's AFC: 8
BFP from Clomid/IUI ~ Pre-e and IUGR during pregnancy ~ DS born 9/4/12
Feb./March 2013: AMH less than 0.16 (undectable) and AFC = 4;
BFP from supps ~ DS#2 due May 2014
May 2014 January Siggy Challenge: