Saw this posted on FB this morning and I really loved it; wanted to share. Thought it might be fun to discuss:
https://m.today.com/moms/mayim-bialik-why-women-shouldnt-fear-home-birth-1C7398354Mayim Bialik, who you may know as Amy from The Big Bang Theory, is a very cool lady. She's a brilliant scientist IRL, and an advocate of attachment parenting, extended breastfeeding, and natural birth. I loved her book, Beyond the Sling.

I can't have a home birth because I'm high risk, and have to work with an OB, but if I had my way, I would labor and birth in the comfort of my home with my family.
What are your feelings about home birth, whether or not YOU would have one and what you think of others having them?
Re: Why women shouldn't fear home birth
Meh...not for me. I never even considered it as an option. I like drugs...Also, I am not the kind of person who would have a warm fuzzy feeling looking at my bed thinking, "this is where I gave birth!" I would look at it and wonder if we could afford a new bed. It just isn't for me.
But I can (sort of) understand why someone would do a home birth. I think if that is something you will treasure the experience of and are super comfortable with labor (or the idea of it) then God bless you. I also think that if you do a home birth and aren't within a reasonable drive (15-20 minutes) of a hospital it is just risky and a little foolish.
ETA: I should have said, I do like the article though. Well written and makes great points without getting too preachy. I like that she didn't try to tell me that I'm wrong to want a hospital birth. It is nice to see home birth presented as why it is a good thing as opposed to why a hospital birth is a bad thing.
I would consider a home birth if I didn't have my mother and brother in law living in the basement. I couldn't really ask them to leave their home for however long it took and wouldn't want them hearing me labour. I like privacy and don't mind a hospital setting with DH, my mom and my midwives.
Also I'm going for VBAC #2. Last time a home birth was definitely not an option as I was high risk and really had to advocate to even attempt a VBAC. I do have a midwife though. The same one who helped me have a successful VBAC, who I am very confident in.
I had to meet with an OB last week regarding my clotting disorder and she was so anti-midwife, saying she can't believe I had a VBAC without a doctor in the room. Well I did. (you should have seen her face!) She said she doesn't recommend me having another VBAC with a midwife. Ha. That's a little too bad. She was saying how my incision could still rupture. I reminded her it's less than a 2% chance (and I wonder if it's even less considering I already had a successful VBAC and my incision will be 6 years old). Anyways she said I was right and had done my research. Yes, because if I don't know my shit, people like her would scare me into having a repeat c-section UNNECESSARILY.
With my first birth I had an OB and it was the exact thing this article talks about. Pitocin causing baby's heart rate to drop, leading to more and more interventions, leading to a c-section. It angers me but I have healed emotionally and empowered myself and I know how to advocate for myself now.
Sorry, I went off on a bit of a tangent there but really needed to vent about that.
Also, I didn't read the article, but imma weigh in anyway.
Home birth is not for me. I'm pretty sure I couldn't this time anyway, because I have a prior c/s, but even with DD, I was hoping to have an unmedicated, natural birth, but I still wouldn't have considered home birth. It all feels too messy to have going on in my house. But that's very much my own personal opinion. I think that for people who are into it, more power to you. For the vast majority of pregnancies, there is no reason why you shouldn't labor and deliver at home if you want to - women have been doing it for hundreds of years. In many, many parts of the world it remains the norm, and plenty of women in the US still do it all the time.
I think that families who choose home birth tend to be really well-informed about the choice they're making, and probably understand childbirth better than most families who just blindly go to the hospital because that's "what you're supposed to do." (I don't mean anyone here, I'm making broad over-generalizations) What I'm saying is that home birth is not a choice that any one makes lightly, whereas choosing to have an epidural or medicated birth at a hospital is the standard in the US, and what most women simply expect, generally without researching or really even considering any other possibilities.
DS2 8/21/12
DD 9/26/14
Baby #4 edd 2/11/19
#1 BFP 1/10/11; missed m/c discovered 7w5d
IF Dx: Endo, hetero MTHFR mutation, poor morphology
#1 IUI: 1/18/12 = BFN
#1 IVF/ICSI 4/2/12 = 2 x 7-cell and 1 x 5-cell transferred (3dt) = BFP!!
H was born at 41w2d on 12/29/12 - be still my heart!
#2 IVF/ICSI 1/19/14 = 2 x 8 cells transferred (3dt) = BFP!! EDD 10/09/14
M&W born at 37 weeks on 9/18/14 - I am the momma of 3 boys!!!
I am very lucky and have a ob who is very forward thinking in terms of giving birth. Below is a quote from her regarding a recent article that she was mentioned in. This article came out before my husband knew that she was my doctor and he was happy that she was going to be involved in this pregnancy.
"Thanks to 225 for giving space to an issue that is important for all of us! I would like to clarify a few things in my own words: Sometimes, timely cesareans can prevent worse complications when they are truly necessary. Avoiding a C-section obviously isn't the ultimate focus of giving birth. However, most of us don't want a cesarean that isn't truly necessary, so not overusing them or doing other interventions that can increase the risk IS important. Also, sometimes an elective induction can be the decision a mom makes, which is understandable when she is truly informed. The risk is highest for first time moms whose cervix is not favorable, and this is the trap that many women fall into because they are nervous about having their first baby and think (or are told) its better to schedule it. They are also often told and believe that (1) you shouldn't go past your due date (when it's normal to go to 41 weeks, and sometimes 42 weeks), and (2) that you should have an induction if "your baby is getting big" (induction in this circumstance increases rather than decreases your risks). Sometimes women have truly extenuating personal circumstances that necessitate trying to the schedule birth of a child, and I take that seriously as well. For myself, I had an induction with my second child due to a very extreme personal circumstance, which I would offer to and discuss with any of my patients. For women with a critically ill family member or a spouse leaving the country, an induction may obviously be the best decision. NONE OF THIS IS BLACK AND WHITE!! I did, however, forgo an elective induction with my first child, which I was offered starting at 39weeks, as well as the elective primary cesarean I was offered because he was big, because I knew better. What I hope for each woman is that she make an informed decision based on what is truly best for her and her child, and not blindly believe that what she is offered by her provider to be the "best" thing in all circumstances. We all get busy and have external pressures to try to fit deliveries into the weekday. I hear OBs say, referring to inductions of labor, "I'm really busy, but at least I got a few done on the same day" and things of that nature. I also know that doctors who only get paid when they are present have a strong financial incentive to schedule and induce. That is the trap that I don't want women to unknowingly fall into. Sincerely, Dr. Buchert"
This make me feel more comfortable being in a hospital and knowing that they don't force things on you that are not medically necessary. I ,myself, have never considered giving birth anywhere other than a hospital but know that I have been provided with more information I am happy that my ob is more crunchy than some others out there.
I am happy that we do have so many choices and that each woman can pick the path that she thinks is best for her.
Our family blog
DS born October 13, 2014
Baby #3 due March 2018
I've had two med free births, the first in a hospital and the second in a birth center inside a hospital. The second was a perfect setting in my opinion. However we have moved since then and are not fully decided where to deliver this time. I am considering flying across the country to deliver where I delivered last time but with an October birth date that might not be logistically possible with DD#1 school. If this was a summer baby there would be no question I would go back. The hospitals here are severely lacking in support for med free births though they are very slowly moving in the right direction. One thing I like about my midwife here (she delivers in hospital) is that I met her at the Improving Birth rally and our views really line up, but she is really my only option here for having a birth even close to what I want.
I like Mayim, but a lot of us won't know we are a complication risk until things start. For me, as much as I'd rather be home, a natural birth in hospital just seems safer.
I don't judge those that choose to birth at home, but I do think they need to be prepared to have flexibility with their birth plan...just in case.
DS born October 13, 2014
Baby #3 due March 2018
Nope. No way no how. While I certainly think birth is over-medicalized, home birth is not medicalized enough. I work in the medical field it's just too risky in my experience. I will give you a pat on the back for having a baby. That pat is not bigger because it was done at home or without an epidural or because you doused yourself in essential oils.
I believe in a happy medium such as birth centers and med-free hospital births. I also believe, nay know, that nature and babies DGAF about your birth plans.
This article sums up my opinion pretty well.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/02/07/the-home-birth-rebellion.html
If you feel it is safe for you and you have someone on hand who knows what to do in an emergency and are close enough to the hospital if something happens, I say go for it. My sister had her VBAC at home without her doctor because it progressed too fast to get to the hospital. Then had the next one at home cause she liked it. Both went well.
Its not for everyone but that doesn't mean you shouldn't look into it if you are interested
This post is worded so well and I love the bolded part.
I really don't think that HOW or WHERE the baby is born matters, just that the baby came out, is fine and good to go. I mean besides being able to brag and say "I went all natural and med free!", it doesn't really make a lick of a difference. I say "brag" because that's what I would do if I could make it through labor without drugs!
I actually find that incredibly insulting. People don't choose homebirth, or med free, because they want a pat on the back, or to brag. It's so insulting that people think that!
Fall 2013: Fertility treatments = first BFP!!
07/23/2013 Drew Steven born at 5lb 12oz
02/10/14: Surprise, spontaneous BFP!
EDD: 10/11/2014 Stick, baby, stick!!
Home birth? OMG I have to say that it is amazing! I have had 2 (one water birth) and am planning a third. I am a huge advocate for it locally also, so safe to say I could talk about all day long!
I'm choosing to birth at a birthing center that is right across the street from an amazing hospital that the birthing center has connections with. I see the hospital as a place to go when I'm sick or something is wrong, not for something that my body is made to do. If other woman want to be in that setting that is their choice. I would be more stressed out in that environment though.
<('.'<) (>'.')> (^'.')> <('.'^) <('.'<) (>'.')> (^'.')> <('.'^) <('.'<) (>'.')> (^'.')> <('.'^)
I'm sorry you felt insulted by my post. I should probably just avoid these sorts of discussions because I feel insulted when I read about natural birth (which I did want for my birth with DD but see my post above about nature not GAF about that) where people act like a c-section is a failure of the mother (never said, probably not even implied, just how I feel when I read), the doctor, the "system". At the risk of sounding like one who doth protest too much, I truly have no regrets about my birth experience and I felt utterly bonded with my daughter in spite of having a c-section. I don't believe those two things are mutually exclusive but that is the feeling I get when I read those home-birth articles. I don't think there is magical window of opportunity for bonding that is missed in your typical c-section as I literally(!) cannot imagine being more bonded to or loving my child more than I do. There is definitely an attitude among some people in the home-birth/natural-birth camp that I do not see in the c-section/epidural camp. Siggies and blinkies and all that noise which I don't really see much of now that I'm not involved in message boards besides this one.
We are both taking impersonal things personally because it's hard not to, I know. Becoming a mother is embarking on the biggest guilt voyage of our lives and I hate that it begins when we are still pregnant and I do not want to contribute to that. Which is why I say, I give you a pat on the back because you had are a mom and hey, that's awesome. You rock. But I really don't care about how it happened, so let's not let that get in the way.