My little one is two weeks old so obviously we are awhile away from making a decision to do this but I wanted your thoughts. I did this method with my almost 11 year old but it was soooo long ago I don't remember much except for it worked. I was reading about it this morning, as I paced, rocked and soothed my LO to fall asleep bc there was no way in heck he was still hungry after eating two bottles an hour ago. ( he must be hitting a growth spurt). Apparently opinions have changed on this method in the last 10 years, just like with everything else I once was taught about raising a baby. Do you have experience with this? Did it work? At what age did you start? Thanks in advance ladies. I trust this board will give me some insight.
ETA: I am not asking to try this on a newborn baby as I know never to do that. I have been reading conflicting ages to start if this was a method I chose. I have read 4 months all the way until 8 months. Not sure when those that have tried this method started.
Re: Cry it out method?
I would never do it with a newborn. I even stated that in the above questions. I have been reading 4 months. 6 months. 7 months.
Here is one of his quotes when asked what he thinks about people "Ferberizing" their kids:
"It's flattering that my name is out there, but it suggests a misunderstanding of what I've been teaching for so long that it concerns me. I've always believed that there are many solutions to sleep problems, and that every family and every child is unique. People want one easy solution, but there's no such thing. I never encouraged parents to let their babies cry it out, but one of the many treatment styles I described in my book is gradual extinction, where you delay your response time to your baby's wakings. I went to great pains in the second edition to clarify that that treatment is not appropriate for every sleep issue, of which there are many. So if someone tells me they tried my "method," I know they only read one small part of my book."
And to be blunt any approach which suggests CIOs before the age of 6 months is total BS IMO.
We did something. Ferber? Sleep Lady shuffle? CIO? I can't remember now.. around 11 months
Baby Chugging born 12.28.13
induction due to HELLP
I, personally, am too much of a wimp to have CIO be successful when the time comes. If you are considering that method, I'd suggest waiting until at least 6 months.
Emma Kate - born 10.16.03 @ 29 weeks, weighed 1lb 13oz and 13.5" long.
TTC #3
partial molar pregnancy : bfp 6.28.10, d/c 8.17.10, 7 rounds methotrexate, cleared 7.1.11
alexander patrick : bfp 1.16.12, born 9.20.12 @ 39w1d, 7 lbs./11 oz./22 in.
scarlett irene elizabeth : bfp 5.24.13, born 2.3.14 @ 41w2d, 7 lbs./13 oz./19 in.
DS1 born 11/3/06 * DS2 born 3/29/08 * DD born 3/15/11
Scarlett Mae born 1/14/14 Our family is now complete!
@peanutmuse. I thought my original post implied that. I stated I had a 2 week old and I am obviously a long ways away from making this decision. I didn't feel the need to specify an age bc I didn't know an age to start.
Bump Unofficial Glossary
I think it's mostly about what works best for you and your baby. There's no right or wrong way. Unless someone expects it to work for their newborn, of course!
@Ljessen13 -- just in case you had any doubt about what I was saying (about your OP not really being clear or people having very strong feelings about it), @Firefly9 swooped in to prove my point.
Won't be doing that again -- won't CIO with a newborn obv but will give more of a chance for baby to self settle for wakings and will try to put down awake more.
We did exhaust "no cry" options first but they didn't work for DS at all. He actually doesn't like to cosleep (as in, he will not fall asleep with us period) and all of my "soothing" attempts were overstimulating him resulting in MORE crying overall.
It depends on the baby to a large degree. In our case I am very glad we didn't wait til closer to a year as DS is very strong willed and a) I would've died from sleep deprivation by then and b) ST would've definitely been much harder on both of us.
He was much happier after we sleep trained and it only really took a few brief 5-10 mom crying sessions. We were pretty lucky in that regard.
When i did CIO, it wasnt just leving her forever. At 20 min, I would go in, pat her back, give her pacifier back, and then leave. If she wasn't asleep after 1 hr (with the 20 min checks) then I would get her up and try again later. The first week was hard, but at week 2, she would fall asleep around 15 min.
Now, she's 20 months. So I do kind of a CIO. If she doesn't nap, I leave her in her room for quiet time for at least 1 hr. Usually she will nap or talk to her teddy bear. If she is crying really hard then I will check on her.
I think it's just different for different babies. DD literally had to be left alone to fall asleep, so modified CIO was best for her.