first off, start by reading the KCCO thread if you haven't already done so, linked below:
as was discussed in there, it seems like a good idea to get a mod going for this board, as we've clearly seen our fair share of drama and inappropriate posts already. i get the impression mods are often chosen after a board is a bit "older", but i wonder if our board might be an exception and require someone sooner. i'm hoping to hear from you guys about this.
according to the TTGP mod in the post above, we should probably nominate or vote on a person (two people, maybe? we are all still in our first trimester, after all...) and send that nomination to Bump Jackie via email. hopefully after that point, we can have a moderating presence here that can help calm the storms as they arise.
so my proposal:
1) we should talk about whether or not this is the right time to choose a mod. we're getting to know one another, but we're nowhere near a "tight" board yet. that kind of dynamic can only develop with time.
2) if we agree to choose one now, i think we should keep the nominations in a SEPARATE nomination thread, not in this one. that just seems cleaner all around, and less confusing.
3) if we get to that nomination point and there are some clear favorites (based on how many people clicked "love it" maybe??) we can make a THIRD post with the actual nominees and people can vote privately so the process is a bit more democratic.
i'm by no means the rule maker here, but i'm tossing these suggestions out as a jumping off point, and we can see what the board as a whole thinks and wants.
Re: we need an official moderator - come in to discuss
From day one on Weddingbook, The Nest, and Mommyhood (the TK, TN, TB fb apps), there were multiple mods (as well as admins). Period. I don't really understand how a forum is supposed to function smoothly without one, especially a forum comprised of 100% women, all of whom are either pregnant and hormonal, hoping to become pregnant and hormonal, or psychotically pretending to be pregnant and hormonal.
I don't know about on TB, but IME, mods can indeed make threads sticky and close them to new responses, they can suspend and ban users for violating TOS, they can issue official warnings to specific users or on threads in general (e.g. warning someone for violating TOS or warning the whole of the forum for allowing a thread to spin out of control), they can delete offending threads (or threads where the OP wants to DD for a valid reason), or delete just specific offending posts within threads.
Generally, there is more than one mod to balance the power and not allow anyone to think they are in charge, or act on a bias (although that can happen, anyway, if the mods are like-minded). Ultimately, it comes down to judgment calls about what is best for the community.
IMHO, it's way past time. Close group or not.
Oops! BFP 4.2.14 | EDD 12.14.14
Oops! BFP 4.2.14 | EDD 12.14.14
Also someone that's going to be able to use good judgment based in a logical not necessarily emotional place. Who can use common sence which is not to common anymore..
Our baby boy,Logan, was born still at 19w3d on 7/1/2011
Our 2nd baby boy, Mason, was born still at 20w3d on 1/31/2012
After a much needed sanity break... we are praying for our rainbows
((BFP 7/29/13)) ((EDD 4/12/14)) It's BOY/GIRL twins!!!
If you would like to recommend someone or volunteer to be a moderator -- please email community@thebump.com
Follow The Bump on Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest!
I'm clearly tardy for the party.