Working Moms

Judgement Thursday

2

Re: Judgement Thursday

  • imagegwinnygirl:
    imageReallynervous83:

    1. I'm an attorney AND I have a tattoo.  Successful and those less so can each have tattoos.  However, tattoos are not professional looking.  So you do limit your job choice when you have uncoverable tattoos.  That's just a fact.

    2.  I noticed in the first post it was also mentioned that they lady was screaming horrible things to her children--I judge this.  I judge people who can't handle their kids in public places.  Your kids' bad behavior should not elicit your bad behavior.    You can always leave the store if they are acting up.  Nope don't want to hear the argument that its the "only" time you can do shopping.  I have two kids, am the only driver in the family, and work full-time.   

    3.  As for as judging what people on assistance buy or don't buy--yes I judge people who buy crap while on assistance--this includes designer bags, big screen TV's etc.  Why?  Because it's about choices.  Yes some people are on assistance because they really need assistance have recently fallen on hard times (lost their job, divorced, medical problems, etc.)  But that does not and is not the majority of people.   The majority of people seem to be "lifers" and while assistance doesn't make you rich, you aren't doing anything to "earn" that money.  So yes, I judge people who make bad choices such as the items noted above while on assistance.  The who goal should be working to get off the assistance and be self-supportive.   

    4.  Also no skittle for poor people implies that it's just a small thing what's the big deal.  If poor people want skittles--no problem.  

    1. Absolutely not a fact. I have many personal acquaintances & friends who work in the professional world with extensive tattoos.

    2. Yes, because no mom is ever allowed to meltdown in public. EVER.

    3. I would really, really like to see where you have gotten this information from. Any reliable, statistical, non-biased/anecdotal evidence would be greatly appreciated.

    4. OKAY.

    And still waiting. Cause its the only thing you can actually provide proof for or against. The other points are a matter of opinion, and my opinion is that the person who stated them is an a-hole.

    "We like nothing better than buffing our Zygoma. And imagining a horny time traveling long overcoat purple scarf wearing super sleuth nordic legend fuck fantasy. Get to work on that, internet." Benedict Cumberbatch

    image

     GIFSoup 

    <a href

  • Loading the player...
  • We grow tomato, cucumber, corn, onion, berries and melon. We wouldn't have much produce in our cart.
  • imagegwinnygirl:
    imageReallynervous83:

    1. I'm an attorney AND I have a tattoo.  Successful and those less so can each have tattoos.  However, tattoos are not professional looking.  So you do limit your job choice when you have uncoverable tattoos.  That's just a fact.

    2.  I noticed in the first post it was also mentioned that they lady was screaming horrible things to her children--I judge this.  I judge people who can't handle their kids in public places.  Your kids' bad behavior should not elicit your bad behavior.    You can always leave the store if they are acting up.  Nope don't want to hear the argument that its the "only" time you can do shopping.  I have two kids, am the only driver in the family, and work full-time.   

    3.  As for as judging what people on assistance buy or don't buy--yes I judge people who buy crap while on assistance--this includes designer bags, big screen TV's etc.  Why?  Because it's about choices.  Yes some people are on assistance because they really need assistance have recently fallen on hard times (lost their job, divorced, medical problems, etc.)  But that does not and is not the majority of people.   The majority of people seem to be "lifers" and while assistance doesn't make you rich, you aren't doing anything to "earn" that money.  So yes, I judge people who make bad choices such as the items noted above while on assistance.  The who goal should be working to get off the assistance and be self-supportive.   

    4.  Also no skittle for poor people implies that it's just a small thing what's the big deal.  If poor people want skittles--no problem.  

    1. Absolutely not a fact. I have many personal acquaintances & friends who work in the professional world with extensive tattoos.  

     There is a difference between extensive and uncoverable.  Also maybe they already had the job before they got the tattoo.  Or they probably had to work harder, be smarter, etc. to get their current job.  Tattos are judged--that's a bottom line.  I never said that people couldn't be successful if they had tattos, I simply said that it can limit job choices.  There are always exceptions.   

    2. Yes, because no mom is ever allowed to meltdown in public. EVER.  Yeah because bad parenting is always "meltdowns"  Sorry, I don't buy it.  And somehow I've been able to raise to kids without screaming and yelling at them in public--shocking I know. 

    3. I would really, really like to see where you have gotten this information from. Any reliable, statistical, non-biased/anecdotal evidence would be greatly appreciated.  I am simply stating from personal experience.  I would love to see the same information that represents your side of the argument.  I'm pretty open-minded on this one. 

    4. OKAY.

    BabyFetus Ticker
  • imageKitiara5512:
    imagegwinnygirl:
    imageReallynervous83:

    1. I'm an attorney AND I have a tattoo.  Successful and those less so can each have tattoos.  However, tattoos are not professional looking.  So you do limit your job choice when you have uncoverable tattoos.  That's just a fact.

    2.  I noticed in the first post it was also mentioned that they lady was screaming horrible things to her children--I judge this.  I judge people who can't handle their kids in public places.  Your kids' bad behavior should not elicit your bad behavior.    You can always leave the store if they are acting up.  Nope don't want to hear the argument that its the "only" time you can do shopping.  I have two kids, am the only driver in the family, and work full-time.   

    3.  As for as judging what people on assistance buy or don't buy--yes I judge people who buy crap while on assistance--this includes designer bags, big screen TV's etc.  Why?  Because it's about choices.  Yes some people are on assistance because they really need assistance have recently fallen on hard times (lost their job, divorced, medical problems, etc.)  But that does not and is not the majority of people.   The majority of people seem to be "lifers" and while assistance doesn't make you rich, you aren't doing anything to "earn" that money.  So yes, I judge people who make bad choices such as the items noted above while on assistance.  The who goal should be working to get off the assistance and be self-supportive.   

    4.  Also no skittle for poor people implies that it's just a small thing what's the big deal.  If poor people want skittles--no problem.  

    1. Absolutely not a fact. I have many personal acquaintances & friends who work in the professional world with extensive tattoos.

    2. Yes, because no mom is ever allowed to meltdown in public. EVER.

    3. I would really, really like to see where you have gotten this information from. Any reliable, statistical, non-biased/anecdotal evidence would be greatly appreciated.

    4. OKAY.

    And still waiting. Cause its the only thing you can actually provide proof for or against. The other points are a matter of opinion, and my opinion is that the person who stated them is an a-hole.

     

    I guess you are going to wait all day.  As I have said this is my personal experience.  I am open-minded on the subject.  So if you have stats/facts/unbiased reliable information, then it would certainly be food for thought (no pun intended) 

    BabyFetus Ticker
  • imagegwinnygirl:
    imageReallynervous83:
    imagegwinnygirl:
    imageReallynervous83:

    1. I'm an attorney AND I have a tattoo.  Successful and those less so can each have tattoos.  However, tattoos are not professional looking.  So you do limit your job choice when you have uncoverable tattoos.  That's just a fact.

    2.  I noticed in the first post it was also mentioned that they lady was screaming horrible things to her children--I judge this.  I judge people who can't handle their kids in public places.  Your kids' bad behavior should not elicit your bad behavior.    You can always leave the store if they are acting up.  Nope don't want to hear the argument that its the "only" time you can do shopping.  I have two kids, am the only driver in the family, and work full-time.   

    3.  As for as judging what people on assistance buy or don't buy--yes I judge people who buy crap while on assistance--this includes designer bags, big screen TV's etc.  Why?  Because it's about choices.  Yes some people are on assistance because they really need assistance have recently fallen on hard times (lost their job, divorced, medical problems, etc.)  But that does not and is not the majority of people.   The majority of people seem to be "lifers" and while assistance doesn't make you rich, you aren't doing anything to "earn" that money.  So yes, I judge people who make bad choices such as the items noted above while on assistance.  The who goal should be working to get off the assistance and be self-supportive.   

    4.  Also no skittle for poor people implies that it's just a small thing what's the big deal.  If poor people want skittles--no problem.  

    1. Absolutely not a fact. I have many personal acquaintances & friends who work in the professional world with extensive tattoos.  

     There is a difference between extensive and uncoverable.  Also maybe they already had the job before they got the tattoo.  Or they probably had to work harder, be smarter, etc. to get their current job.  Tattos are judged--that's a bottom line.  I never said that people couldn't be successful if they had tattos, I simply said that it can limit job choices.  There are always exceptions.   

    2. Yes, because no mom is ever allowed to meltdown in public. EVER.  Yeah because bad parenting is always "meltdowns"  Sorry, I don't buy it.  And somehow I've been able to raise to kids without screaming and yelling at them in public--shocking I know. 

    3. I would really, really like to see where you have gotten this information from. Any reliable, statistical, non-biased/anecdotal evidence would be greatly appreciated.  I am simply stating from personal experience.  I would love to see the same information that represents your side of the argument.  I'm pretty open-minded on this one. 

    4. OKAY.

    By stating it was a fact I took at is implying it is a rule - when that's just not true. The workforce is changing. The demographics are changing & what is considerable acceptable regarding body modification is changing.

    Congratulations on being able to out-mom every mom every by having the bestest behaved kids at all times in public places & never losing your cool. You win.

    So we agree then, you were using anecdotal evidence - there is absolutely no fact in this statement, just a personal bias? Good. 

     So now you are stating a fact about tattoos.  I'm confused, mine is wrong but yours is right because you are stating it.  I will agree that world is less conservative when it comes to piercings, tattoos, etc.  But I won't agree that having uncoverable tattoos doesn't limit your job choices.  Maybe not as much as it did once (which I'm all for).  

    I didn't say I haven't ever lost my cool--I just don't yell and swear at my kids in public.  Thanks for the win!  I do walk them quickly out of the store, sometimes in quite the rush.

    Yes I'm using anecdotal evidence--that is what opinions are based on.  I forgot, what evidence is it that you are using?  Oh that's right, you are using your opinion, unless I missed where you are backing up your side with sources.  As I have said, because it's anecdotal and my opinion, I have an open mind and would love someone to post stat/unbiased reliable information on the subject.  Otherwise I have never said it wasn't my opinion, just as yours is your opinion 

    BabyFetus Ticker
  • imageReallynervous83:

    I would love to see the stats/facts that you have on this (honestly).  I did criminal defense and prosecution for  a while as well as legal aid.  The majority of people I dealt with were not interested in working, did not try to find a job, and hadn't just "fallen on hard times".  They were lifers.  Extra cash in their pockets meant some type of new toy/game/phone etc.   

    In criminal defense, you are less likely to come across honest people. For starters, you work with lawyers. Secondly, there are your clients. Working with a less than honest segment of society hardly qualifies you to judge the welfare system based on personal anecdotes.

    Here is something I found today. It only has a few stats regarding welfare qualifications, but since I have it right now...

    As Alabama Cuts Benefits, Desperate Man ?Robs? Bank To Get Food, Shelter In Jail

    By Scott Keyes on Jul 11, 2013 at 12:45 pm

    Rickie Lawrence Gardner

    So desperate for food and shelter, an Alabama man did the unthinkable this week: robbing a bank so he could turn himself in and get sent to jail.

    Rickie Lawrence Gardner, a 49-year-old man from the small town of Moulton, Alabama, entered Bank Independent on Monday and handed the teller a note saying he had a gun and to hand over the bank?s money. After the employee complied, Gardner took the bag of cash, walked outside, and locked it in his car. He then sat on a bench in front of the bank and waited for police officers to arrive.

    ?When officers got there, he did not offer any kind of resistance. He was just waiting on them,? Moulton Police Chief Lyndon McWhorter said. ?His is the first bank robbery I?ve ever worked where the robber was waiting outside the bank for the police to turn himself in.?

    What drove Gardner to such a drastic measure? He was on the cusp of losing his job because a leg injury put him in so much pain that it prevented him from working. Facing possible homelessness, jail was a preferable option in his mind. And he wasn?t looking for just a short stay. Despite his note, Gardner wasn?t even carrying a gun when he committed the robbery; he?d only mentioned it in the note, according to the AP, ?because he thought it would get him a longer sentence.?

    As heartbreaking as it is that a poor American might think that giving up his own freedom is his best hope for survival, there are many reasons why someone might hold that view. Indeed, Alabama has one of the worst social safety nets of any state in the country. It has one of the stingiest maximum TANF benefits, formerly known as welfare, at just $190 per month for a family of two. In other words, even if Gardner had a child and were receiving $190 per month, that would still leave him 85 percent lower than the federal poverty line of $14,710.

    Alabama lawmakers have also made it increasingly difficult for poor residents like Gardner to receive health care. Though some Republican governors in states like Arizona and Ohio have embraced Obamacare?s expansion of Medicaid to cover poor citizens, Alabama has steadfastly opposed doing so, despite the fact that it?s fully funded by the federal government for the first three years. As a result, hundreds of thousands of low-income individuals won?t receive health care. Even without the Medicaid expansion, it?s already incredibly difficult to be eligible in Alabama. A single adult, like Gardner, who makes more than $1,332 per year is considered too wealthy to qualify for Medicaid in Alabama.

    Perhaps most tragic about Gardner?s saga is that even if he gets his wish and winds up in prison, Alabama?s incarceration system is severely overcrowded and underfunded. Because it draws its funding largely from the General Fund, state lawmakers? budget-cutting zeal could produce shortfalls in prison funding. As a result, Chris Sanders, a policy analyst at the public interest group Arise Citizens? Policy Project, notes that Gardner could be entering ?a system that runs at nearly double its designed capacity and that many people long have believed to be teetering on the brink of a federal takeover.?

    So for those of you who think people WANT to live this way, maybe broaden your horizons and pull your heads out your asses.

     

    "We like nothing better than buffing our Zygoma. And imagining a horny time traveling long overcoat purple scarf wearing super sleuth nordic legend fuck fantasy. Get to work on that, internet." Benedict Cumberbatch

    image

     GIFSoup 

    <a href

  • I judge moms who go out every weekend. I don't care if you are going out and it's 11:00 p.m. If your kid wakes up you should be there in the middle of the night. I'm not talking to moms that do this once in a while. But every weekend or even every other weekend. I judge.
  • imagePrivacyWanted:
    imageReallynervous83:

    imagePrivacyWanted:
    People buy processed junk because it's cheap and lasts awhile. when you don't have money and are surviving on snap do you really think you're going to get the produce that gets expensive quick, or the 99 box of pop tarts? And really I have no idea how much pop tarts cost because since I graduated school I don't buy that crap. but you'd better believe for 3years of law school my cart was filled with top ramen, smart ones and the store brand pop tarts.

     Yes, I have been here while in law school.  But I never put my kids in the position of not having a healthy meal, even if it meant I went without.     

    How do you know she's still not going without? My children eat completely healthy , made from scratch, well balanced meals and snacks. I also spend way more than food stamps give

     

    Actually you've got me there.  I don't know, maybe she is feeding her kids crap because that is what she can afford and she is not eating....maybe.  But it's not judgement if you know their entire life story and background, and where's the fun in that?  Everyone has something they judge about--whether it be the way someone dresses, what someone eats, the color of someone's hair etc.  If you don't judge at all--then you win.  My only super power --as mentioned above--is being able to keep from yelling and screaming at my kids in public.  So on a judgement thread, I have comented what I judge.   

    BabyFetus Ticker
  • imagekkramer1211:
    I judge moms who go out every weekend. I don't care if you are going out and it's 11:00 p.m. If your kid wakes up you should be there in the middle of the night. I'm not talking to moms that do this once in a while. But every weekend or even every other weekend. I judge.

    Me too! Especially the ones who act like the world's greatest parent and complain about others who go out 'all the time' on FB, yet are the ones going out every other weekend when their kids are at their dad's house.

     I've went out once since my son was born, and even then came home early because I missed him.

    Pregnancy Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageKitiara5512:
    imageReallynervous83:

    I would love to see the stats/facts that you have on this (honestly).  I did criminal defense and prosecution for  a while as well as legal aid.  The majority of people I dealt with were not interested in working, did not try to find a job, and hadn't just "fallen on hard times".  They were lifers.  Extra cash in their pockets meant some type of new toy/game/phone etc.   

    In criminal defense, you are less likely to come across honest people. For starters, you work with lawyers. Secondly, there are your clients. Working with a less than honest segment of society hardly qualifies you to judge the welfare system based on personal anecdotes.

    Here is something I found today. It only has a few stats regarding welfare qualifications, but since I have it right now...

    As Alabama Cuts Benefits, Desperate Man ?Robs? Bank To Get Food, Shelter In Jail

    By Scott Keyes on Jul 11, 2013 at 12:45 pm

    Rickie Lawrence Gardner

    So desperate for food and shelter, an Alabama man did the unthinkable this week: robbing a bank so he could turn himself in and get sent to jail.

    Rickie Lawrence Gardner, a 49-year-old man from the small town of Moulton, Alabama, entered Bank Independent on Monday and handed the teller a note saying he had a gun and to hand over the bank?s money. After the employee complied, Gardner took the bag of cash, walked outside, and locked it in his car. He then sat on a bench in front of the bank and waited for police officers to arrive.

    ?When officers got there, he did not offer any kind of resistance. He was just waiting on them,? Moulton Police Chief Lyndon McWhorter said. ?His is the first bank robbery I?ve ever worked where the robber was waiting outside the bank for the police to turn himself in.?

    What drove Gardner to such a drastic measure? He was on the cusp of losing his job because a leg injury put him in so much pain that it prevented him from working. Facing possible homelessness, jail was a preferable option in his mind. And he wasn?t looking for just a short stay. Despite his note, Gardner wasn?t even carrying a gun when he committed the robbery; he?d only mentioned it in the note, according to the AP, ?because he thought it would get him a longer sentence.?

    As heartbreaking as it is that a poor American might think that giving up his own freedom is his best hope for survival, there are many reasons why someone might hold that view. Indeed, Alabama has one of the worst social safety nets of any state in the country. It has one of the stingiest maximum TANF benefits, formerly known as welfare, at just $190 per month for a family of two. In other words, even if Gardner had a child and were receiving $190 per month, that would still leave him 85 percent lower than the federal poverty line of $14,710.

    Alabama lawmakers have also made it increasingly difficult for poor residents like Gardner to receive health care. Though some Republican governors in states like Arizona and Ohio have embraced Obamacare?s expansion of Medicaid to cover poor citizens, Alabama has steadfastly opposed doing so, despite the fact that it?s fully funded by the federal government for the first three years. As a result, hundreds of thousands of low-income individuals won?t receive health care. Even without the Medicaid expansion, it?s already incredibly difficult to be eligible in Alabama. A single adult, like Gardner, who makes more than $1,332 per year is considered too wealthy to qualify for Medicaid in Alabama.

    Perhaps most tragic about Gardner?s saga is that even if he gets his wish and winds up in prison, Alabama?s incarceration system is severely overcrowded and underfunded. Because it draws its funding largely from the General Fund, state lawmakers? budget-cutting zeal could produce shortfalls in prison funding. As a result, Chris Sanders, a policy analyst at the public interest group Arise Citizens? Policy Project, notes that Gardner could be entering ?a system that runs at nearly double its designed capacity and that many people long have believed to be teetering on the brink of a federal takeover.?

    So for those of you who think people WANT to live this way, maybe broaden your horizons and pull your heads out your asses.

     

     

    I saw this and have to say that Alabama is CRAZY (there I judged).

    However, most lawyers I have dealt with are pretty ethical despite the bad rap attorneys get in general.  You are judging when you say that they are less then honest, right?

    Yes I agree, my bias probably does have to do with dealing with the less then honest public.  Obviously if you can kill a person, you can probably also cheat the system.  It would be interesting to see if there was a relationship between criminal records and welfare assistance and if so, why that relationship exists.  

    I find welfare in general to be interesting, but only because I keep an open-mind on it.  Sincerely, I believe we should tighten those who can get it.  But give more to those who qualify.  Obviously, what we really need is a system that would prevent the "lifers" and help those who are really in need and are really struggling and working to become self-supportive.  I'm all for that.   

     

    But until that time....I'm going to continue to lock down the skittles :-) 

    BabyFetus Ticker
  • imageashcody2:

    imagekkramer1211:
    I judge moms who go out every weekend. I don't care if you are going out and it's 11:00 p.m. If your kid wakes up you should be there in the middle of the night. I'm not talking to moms that do this once in a while. But every weekend or even every other weekend. I judge.

    Me too! Especially the ones who act like the world's greatest parent and complain about others who go out 'all the time' on FB, yet are the ones going out every other weekend when their kids are at their dad's house.

     I've went out once since my son was born, and even then came home early because I missed him.

    Exactly, acting like super mom on FB and then posting pictures of yourself later out drinking and doing it multiple times a month is not cool. I don't care. Have a glass of wine at home and be there for your kids!

  • imageashcody2:

    imagekkramer1211:
    I judge moms who go out every weekend. I don't care if you are going out and it's 11:00 p.m. If your kid wakes up you should be there in the middle of the night. I'm not talking to moms that do this once in a while. But every weekend or even every other weekend. I judge.

    Me too! Especially the ones who act like the world's greatest parent and complain about others who go out 'all the time' on FB, yet are the ones going out every other weekend when their kids are at their dad's house.

     I've went out once since my son was born, and even then came home early because I missed him.

    lolwhut?

    So moms are supposed to stay at home when their kids aren't even at home? 

    For cereal? 

    When my kids are spending the night at my parents house, you best believe I'm getting out of the house and not sitting there crying in my processed food Cheerios that one of my kids isn't waking me up at 3 AM.

     

    imageimage 

    image

    Unable to even.  

    ********************

    You don't understand the appeal of Benedict Cumberbatch / think he's fug / don't know who he is? WATCH SHERLOCK.  Until you do, your negative opinion of him will not be taken seriously.



  • imageFreshlyWashed:

    imageNetty_3:
    I judge my boss for chastising me yesterday on the timing I told him I was pregnant with LO. (over two years ago!) I found out I was pregnant after I was hired (2 months pregnant) and chose to not tell until I was three months because I didn't want to jinx a pregnancy we thought would never happen (and we didn't even plan it). Plus I had asked my SIL who's an HR exec for a large corp, and she advised me to wait as well until then.

    So you told him at 3 months pregnant?  

    Yes, right after the first trimester, where most people are in the clear.

    AlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers Anniversary
  • imageNetty_3:
    imageFreshlyWashed:

    imageNetty_3:
    I judge my boss for chastising me yesterday on the timing I told him I was pregnant with LO. (over two years ago!) I found out I was pregnant after I was hired (2 months pregnant) and chose to not tell until I was three months because I didn't want to jinx a pregnancy we thought would never happen (and we didn't even plan it). Plus I had asked my SIL who's an HR exec for a large corp, and she advised me to wait as well until then.

    So you told him at 3 months pregnant?  

    Yes, right after the first trimester, where most people are in the clear.

    Thats when we told people because fear of miscarriage. It took me another month to tell my boss to get my long term sub ready. Kudos to you, did you throat punch him? :) 

  • imageashcody2:

    imagekkramer1211:
    I judge moms who go out every weekend. I don't care if you are going out and it's 11:00 p.m. If your kid wakes up you should be there in the middle of the night. I'm not talking to moms that do this once in a while. But every weekend or even every other weekend. I judge.

    Me too! Especially the ones who act like the world's greatest parent and complain about others who go out 'all the time' on FB, yet are the ones going out every other weekend when their kids are at their dad's house.

     I've went out once since my son was born, and even then came home early because I missed him.

    That doesn't make sense. 

    Pregnancy Ticker
  • imageshanado:
    imageLoisLayn23:
    Feel free to judge my cart all you want. I have my own garden and we hit up our awesome farmer's market every weekend where it's better quality and cheaper. So my grocery store cart is all the other stuff. IDGAF.
    Exactly. We go to 3 different stores.

    Same here...I get boxed foods like cereal...and yikes/gasp...crackers at Target or Wal-Mart and hit up Whole Foods or Sprouts for meat and produce...

    AlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers Anniversary
  • imagegwinnygirl:
    imageReallynervous83:

     So now you are stating a fact about tattoos.  I'm confused, mine is wrong but yours is right because you are stating it.  I will agree that world is less conservative when it comes to piercings, tattoos, etc.  But I won't agree that having uncoverable tattoos doesn't limit your job choices.  Maybe not as much as it did once (which I'm all for).  

    I didn't say I haven't ever lost my cool--I just don't yell and swear at my kids in public.  Thanks for the win!  I do walk them quickly out of the store, sometimes in quite the rush.

    Yes I'm using anecdotal evidence--that is what opinions are based on.  I forgot, what evidence is it that you are using?  Oh that's right, you are using your opinion, unless I missed where you are backing up your side with sources.  As I have said, because it's anecdotal and my opinion, I have an open mind and would love someone to post stat/unbiased reliable information on the subject.  Otherwise I have never said it wasn't my opinion, just as yours is your opinion 

    I stated that the workforce is changing, so saying it absolutely limits choices isn't necessarily true. 

    Also, I didn't come in making a sweeping statement that the vast majority of people on public assistance are abusing the system. YOU did. Which is why more than one person asked you where you got that info. It was only after that you clarified it was your opinion.  I don't have stats to provide why I think that's false because none exist, just like not evidence exists to support your opinion (that I am aware of). 

    Actually my statement was "it SEEMS...."  Obviously, my opinion and not a fact.  So the takeaway here is that we both have opinions (mine that welfare is milked by people gaming the system and the majority SEEM to be "lifers") and yours which is welfare only goes to those who truly need it and a minority game the system, right?  So aren't people allowed to have differing opinions, I'm unsure of what your problem is?  I understand you don't like my opinion, but you not liking it doesn't make it wrong. Or did I miss where I said we should stop all welfare.  

    I stated that the workforce is changing, so saying it absolutely limits choices isn't necessarily true.  We disagree on this.  You are stating your opinion and I have stated mine.  Again, unless you have some facts to back this up, my opinion won't change.  Having a tattoo, or lots of them, that can't be covered will limit your job choices.  Obviously there are exceptions--butin general you are going to get side-eyed in the interview.  

    BabyFetus Ticker
  • imagembenit4:
    imageReallynervous83:

    2.  I noticed in the first post it was also mentioned that they lady was screaming horrible things to her children--I judge this.  I judge people who can't handle their kids in public places.  Your kids' bad behavior should not elicit your bad behavior.    You can always leave the store if they are acting up.  Nope don't want to hear the argument that its the "only" time you can do shopping.  I have two kids, am the only driver in the family, and work full-time.   

    I am not leaving the store. If I pack my two kids to the damn store after work, I am not leaving until I get whatthefuck I went for. Deal with it.

    I will put their butt in the cart and keep it moving.

    Clearly your choice.  I don't have a problem with that being your choice.  But if you are swearing, screaming, and yelling at your kids in public, I'm going to judge you.  People are judged for their choices all the time.  You, right now, are judging me for judging those people.   

    BabyFetus Ticker
  • imageNetty_3:

    imageshanado:
    imageLoisLayn23:
    Feel free to judge my cart all you want. I have my own garden and we hit up our awesome farmer's market every weekend where it's better quality and cheaper. So my grocery store cart is all the other stuff. IDGAF.
    Exactly. We go to 3 different stores.

    Same here...I get boxed foods like cereal...and yikes/gasp...crackers at Target or Wal-Mart and hit up Whole Foods or Sprouts for meat and produce...

    Some govt assistance programs give vouchers to farmers markets, as well. Juuust sayin. 

    Pregnancy Ticker
  • imagekkramer1211:
    imageashcody2:

    imagekkramer1211:
    I judge moms who go out every weekend. I don't care if you are going out and it's 11:00 p.m. If your kid wakes up you should be there in the middle of the night. I'm not talking to moms that do this once in a while. But every weekend or even every other weekend. I judge.

    Me too! Especially the ones who act like the world's greatest parent and complain about others who go out 'all the time' on FB, yet are the ones going out every other weekend when their kids are at their dad's house.

     I've went out once since my son was born, and even then came home early because I missed him.

    Exactly, acting like super mom on FB and then posting pictures of yourself later out drinking and doing it multiple times a month is not cool. I don't care. Have a glass of wine at home and be there for your kids!

    LOL.  Sorry your lives aren't fun.  That's really too bad.

  • imageoverture:
    imagekkramer1211:
    imageashcody2:

    imagekkramer1211:
    I judge moms who go out every weekend. I don't care if you are going out and it's 11:00 p.m. If your kid wakes up you should be there in the middle of the night. I'm not talking to moms that do this once in a while. But every weekend or even every other weekend. I judge.

    Me too! Especially the ones who act like the world's greatest parent and complain about others who go out 'all the time' on FB, yet are the ones going out every other weekend when their kids are at their dad's house.


    &nbsp;I've went out once since my son was born, and even then came home early because I missed him.



    Exactly, acting like super mom on FB and then posting pictures of yourself later out drinking and doing it multiple times a month is not cool. I don't care. Have a glass of wine at home and be there for your kids!

    LOL.&nbsp; Sorry your lives aren't fun.&nbsp; That's really too bad.

    I'm going to divorce Dh so I can go out every other weekend.


    I kid. Kinda.
  • imageNicb13:
    imageReallynervous83:
    imagembenit4:
    imageReallynervous83:

    2.  I noticed in the first post it was also mentioned that they lady was screaming horrible things to her children--I judge this.  I judge people who can't handle their kids in public places.  Your kids' bad behavior should not elicit your bad behavior.    You can always leave the store if they are acting up.  Nope don't want to hear the argument that its the "only" time you can do shopping.  I have two kids, am the only driver in the family, and work full-time.   

    I am not leaving the store. If I pack my two kids to the damn store after work, I am not leaving until I get whatthefuck I went for. Deal with it.

    I will put their butt in the cart and keep it moving.

    Clearly your choice.  I don't have a problem with that being your choice.  But if you are swearing, screaming, and yelling at your kids in public, I'm going to judge you.  People are judged for their choices all the time.  You, right now, are judging me for judging those people.   

    Someone always has to say something like this on these threads. Maybe I missed it while I was at the store buying an apple.

     And now I'm judging you for buying an apple.  Why don't you have time to grow your own?  Also was it an organic apple because if not, then you should have just skipped it in the first place.  

    BabyFetus Ticker
  • You guys, sometimes...I go out at night on weekdays.  CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT SHlT?

  • imageoverture:
    You guys, sometimes...I go out at night on weekdays.nbsp; CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT SHlT?
    You are a terrible mom. I'm calling CPS.
  • imageshanado:
    imageoverture:
    You guys, sometimes...I go out at night on weekdays.nbsp; CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT SHlT?
    You are a terrible mom. I'm calling CPS.

    But my husband has tattoos!  They will totally take my kid!

  • imagelasposa425:
    imageReallynervous83:
    imagegwinnygirl:
    imageReallynervous83:

     So now you are stating a fact about tattoos.  I'm confused, mine is wrong but yours is right because you are stating it.  I will agree that world is less conservative when it comes to piercings, tattoos, etc.  But I won't agree that having uncoverable tattoos doesn't limit your job choices.  Maybe not as much as it did once (which I'm all for).  

    I didn't say I haven't ever lost my cool--I just don't yell and swear at my kids in public.  Thanks for the win!  I do walk them quickly out of the store, sometimes in quite the rush.

    Yes I'm using anecdotal evidence--that is what opinions are based on.  I forgot, what evidence is it that you are using?  Oh that's right, you are using your opinion, unless I missed where you are backing up your side with sources.  As I have said, because it's anecdotal and my opinion, I have an open mind and would love someone to post stat/unbiased reliable information on the subject.  Otherwise I have never said it wasn't my opinion, just as yours is your opinion 

    I stated that the workforce is changing, so saying it absolutely limits choices isn't necessarily true. 

    Also, I didn't come in making a sweeping statement that the vast majority of people on public assistance are abusing the system. YOU did. Which is why more than one person asked you where you got that info. It was only after that you clarified it was your opinion.  I don't have stats to provide why I think that's false because none exist, just like not evidence exists to support your opinion (that I am aware of). 

    Actually my statement was "it SEEMS...."  Obviously, my opinion and not a fact.  So the takeaway here is that we both have opinions (mine that welfare is milked by people gaming the system and the majority SEEM to be "lifers") and yours which is welfare only goes to those who truly need it and a minority game the system, right?  So aren't people allowed to have differing opinions, I'm unsure of what your problem is?  I understand you don't like my opinion, but you not liking it doesn't make it wrong. Or did I miss where I said we should stop all welfare.  

    I stated that the workforce is changing, so saying it absolutely limits choices isn't necessarily true.  We disagree on this.  You are stating your opinion and I have stated mine.  Again, unless you have some facts to back this up, my opinion won't change.  Having a tattoo, or lots of them, that can't be covered will limit your job choices.  Obviously there are exceptions--butin general you are going to get side-eyed in the interview.  

    Not to beat a dead horse but you originally wrote: "Yes some people are on assistance because they really need assistance have recently fallen on hard times (lost their job, divorced, medical problems, etc.)  But that does not and is not the majority of people."  

    To me, that came across as if you were asserting it as some sort of fact, which it's not. 

    I don't mind beating a dead horse...obviously they can't feel it.  Below is on page three of this thread and what I originally said.  Your quote is taken out of context because the very next sentence I say. IT SEEMS.....  I guess I could have made it more clear that it's my opinion, but I thought that was a given when posting on a baby board.  But I think I have restated several times now that it is my opinion  

    Also, while I'm not asserting a fact, we can't say it might not be what is factual, because in reality we don't know if it is or if it isn't.   Just as we don't know if your opposite it fact--it actually might be and might not be. 

    "As for as judging what people on assistance buy or don't buy--yes I judge people who buy crap while on assistance--this includes designer bags, big screen TV's etc.  Why?  Because it's about choices.  Yes some people are on assistance because they really need assistance have recently fallen on hard times (lost their job, divorced, medical problems, etc.)  But that does not and is not the majority of people.   The majority of people seem to be "lifers" and while assistance doesn't make you rich, you aren't doing anything to "earn" that money.  So yes, I judge people who make bad choices such as the items noted above while on assistance.  The who goal should be working to get off the assistance and be self-supportive." 

    BabyFetus Ticker
  • imagembenit4:
    imageashcody2:

    imagekkramer1211:
    I judge moms who go out every weekend. I don't care if you are going out and it's 11:00 p.m. If your kid wakes up you should be there in the middle of the night. I'm not talking to moms that do this once in a while. But every weekend or even every other weekend. I judge.

    Me too! Especially the ones who act like the world's greatest parent and complain about others who go out 'all the time' on FB, yet are the ones going out every other weekend when their kids are at their dad's house.

     I've went out once since my son was born, and even then came home early because I missed him.

    I didn't know becoming a parent meant your life was now over and God forbid you wanted to take up any outside interests.

    I meant going out like drinking, bar hopping every single weekend your kids are gone and then posting your drunken escapades on FB. I can only think of one individual I know that does this every.single.weekend. her kids are gone.

    Pregnancy Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagechristel811:

    imagekkramer1211:
    I judge moms who go out every weekend. I don't care if you are going out and it's 11:00 p.m. If your kid wakes up you should be there in the middle of the night. I'm not talking to moms that do this once in a while. But every weekend or even every other weekend. I judge.

    I judge dads for this too.

    Is it sad I almost feel jealous? Haha. I am in bed so early, I would cherish a night out, but Big Bang Theory and my sweats always call my name :) 

  • imageNicb13:
    imageReallynervous83:
    imageNicb13:
    imageReallynervous83:
    imagembenit4:
    imageReallynervous83:

    2.  I noticed in the first post it was also mentioned that they lady was screaming horrible things to her children--I judge this.  I judge people who can't handle their kids in public places.  Your kids' bad behavior should not elicit your bad behavior.    You can always leave the store if they are acting up.  Nope don't want to hear the argument that its the "only" time you can do shopping.  I have two kids, am the only driver in the family, and work full-time.   

    I am not leaving the store. If I pack my two kids to the damn store after work, I am not leaving until I get whatthefuck I went for. Deal with it.

    I will put their butt in the cart and keep it moving.

    Clearly your choice.  I don't have a problem with that being your choice.  But if you are swearing, screaming, and yelling at your kids in public, I'm going to judge you.  People are judged for their choices all the time.  You, right now, are judging me for judging those people.   

    Someone always has to say something like this on these threads. Maybe I missed it while I was at the store buying an apple.

     And now I'm judging you for buying an apple.  Why don't you have time to grow your own?  Also was it an organic apple because if not, then you should have just skipped it in the first place.  

    Nope, the dumpy store in the piss poor city I work in doesn't have organic fruits!

    Okay, but now I'm judging you for not being willingly to drive 4-6 hours to find a store with organic produce.  I mean really--how can you raise a kid on the other crap, you know they are going to grow up to be a delinquent.  

     On another note--I also judge people who feed their kids trans fats.  The kids have little choice about what they eat and new research suggest that trans fats don't ever leave the body.   

    BabyFetus Ticker
  • I've got another-. 

    I judge moms who pierce their little girls ears at or near birth, yet I don't judge parents who circumcise their little boys.

     Flame away.  I'm also going out this weekend while my kid is with my husband... 

    BabyFetus Ticker
  • imageashcody2:
    imagembenit4:
    imageashcody2:

    imagekkramer1211:
    I judge moms who go out every weekend. I don't care if you are going out and it's 11:00 p.m. If your kid wakes up you should be there in the middle of the night. I'm not talking to moms that do this once in a while. But every weekend or even every other weekend. I judge.

    Me too! Especially the ones who act like the world's greatest parent and complain about others who go out 'all the time' on FB, yet are the ones going out every other weekend when their kids are at their dad's house.

     I've went out once since my son was born, and even then came home early because I missed him.

    I didn't know becoming a parent meant your life was now over and God forbid you wanted to take up any outside interests.

    I meant going out like drinking, bar hopping every single weekend your kids are gone and then posting your drunken escapades on FB. I can only think of one individual I know that does this every.single.weekend. her kids are gone.

    HER.KIDS.ARE.GONE.

    She doesn't have to stay home and do mom stuff. I would judge anyone who stays home every night her kid is gone and feels smug about it.

    That doesn't make you a better mom. It makes you boring.

    imageimage 

    image

    Unable to even.  

    ********************

    You don't understand the appeal of Benedict Cumberbatch / think he's fug / don't know who he is? WATCH SHERLOCK.  Until you do, your negative opinion of him will not be taken seriously.



  • imageashcody2:

    I meant going out like drinking, bar hopping every single weekend your kids are gone and then posting your drunken escapades on FB. I can only think of one individual I know that does this every.single.weekend. her kids are gone.

    image
  • I judge people who have to go to another board to mock people whose opinions they disagree with. 

    I would rather have the debate on something then have to sink to name calling and the such.  

    Oh, and I'm calling out Ellahella posting on the parenting board.   

    BabyFetus Ticker
  • imageashcody2:
    imagembenit4:
    imageashcody2:

    imagekkramer1211:
    I judge moms who go out every weekend. I don't care if you are going out and it's 11:00 p.m. If your kid wakes up you should be there in the middle of the night. I'm not talking to moms that do this once in a while. But every weekend or even every other weekend. I judge.

    Me too! Especially the ones who act like the world's greatest parent and complain about others who go out 'all the time' on FB, yet are the ones going out every other weekend when their kids are at their dad's house.


    &nbsp;I've went out once since my son was born, and even then came home early because I missed him.


    I didn't know becoming a parent meant your life was now over and God forbid you wanted to take up any outside interests.

    I meant going out like drinking, bar hopping every single weekend your kids are gone and then posting your drunken escapades on FB. I can only think of one individual I know that does this every.single.weekend. her kids are gone.

    If I get the chance to go out, you bet your asss I'm going to the bar.
  • imagelasposa425:

    I hear you reallynervous - that is your opinion that the majority are lifers.  I posted some stats that show that your opinion isn't really based on fact.  

    My last post on this thread, I promise (I think) but I must quote Stewart: "

    "Why is it that if you take advantage of a corporate tax break you're a smart businessman, but if you take advantage of something so you don't go hungry, you're a moocher?"

    I appreciate you posting stats, because I do realize that my opinion can be bias.  I did takeaway from the stats that they were more about trafficking and not about people who stay on assistance just because they can.  I'm really not sure how you would even go about conducting a study on that.  But that is what I mean by "lifers", people who could find jobs etc. which would allow them to be self-supportive but don't do so.

    I like your quote.   

    BabyFetus Ticker
  • imageReallynervous83:

    I judge people who have to go to another board to mock people whose opinions they disagree with. 

    I would rather have the debate on something then have to sink to name calling and the such.  

    Oh, and I'm calling out Ellahella posting on the parenting board.   

    You should really go over to Parenting and post this.  Really.

    Like, really.

  • I thought I did in reply to their thread, but I'm mobile bumping.  Heading over to parenting to check it out.  
    BabyFetus Ticker
  • imageReallynervous83:
    I judge people who have to go to another board to mock people whose opinions they disagree with.nbsp;I would rather have the debate on something then have to sink to name calling and the such. nbsp;Oh, and I'm calling out Ellahella posting on the parenting board. nbsp;nbsp;
    So, wtf is your point?
  • imageCinemaGoddess:
    imageashcody2:
    imagembenit4:
    imageashcody2:

    imagekkramer1211:
    I judge moms who go out every weekend. I don't care if you are going out and it's 11:00 p.m. If your kid wakes up you should be there in the middle of the night. I'm not talking to moms that do this once in a while. But every weekend or even every other weekend. I judge.

    Me too! Especially the ones who act like the world's greatest parent and complain about others who go out 'all the time' on FB, yet are the ones going out every other weekend when their kids are at their dad's house.

     I've went out once since my son was born, and even then came home early because I missed him.

    I didn't know becoming a parent meant your life was now over and God forbid you wanted to take up any outside interests.

    I meant going out like drinking, bar hopping every single weekend your kids are gone and then posting your drunken escapades on FB. I can only think of one individual I know that does this every.single.weekend. her kids are gone.

    HER.KIDS.ARE.GONE.

    She doesn't have to stay home and do mom stuff. I would judge anyone who stays home every night her kid is gone and feels smug about it.

    That doesn't make you a better mom. It makes you boring.

    I have become pretty boring since becoming a mom I guess, I like to sleep when I can. LO likes to play at 1, 3 & get up at 5 am, so I'm tired. I'd just rather stay in and have a beer instead of going out and get wasted every weekend, it's just not for me anymore. You judge me, that's fine - that's what this post is for and I judged her since again, that's what this post is for.

    Pregnancy Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageEllaHella:
    imageReallynervous83:

    I judge people who have to go to another board to mock people whose opinions they disagree with. 

    I would rather have the debate on something then have to sink to name calling and the such.  

    Oh, and I'm calling out Ellahella posting on the parenting board.   

    ::gasp::

    I was mocking you here too. 

    Yeah, but you were so stressed out about my opinion that you had to do it on two separate boards.  It actually makes me smile a bit to have gotten so much under your skin that instead of entering into the debate (which everyone else has) you had to resort to mocking me and name-calling.   Calm down.

    BabyFetus Ticker
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"