Any STMs have a positive experience with Pitocin?
I always read negative about inductions or speeding things up with Pitocin.
After I got my epidural, the contractions got wonky so the OB gave me some Pitocin. It got things moving again and that was it. I didn't need more epidural, it didn't slow down labor or make it harder to push or make it so I needed a c-section. But I also wasn't induced...
I know that my mom had something similar with Pitocin when she was in labor with me 34 years ago.
Anyone else? Is it possible that there's a time and a place for Pitocin but it's just overused and abused these days?
Just curious others' responses.
Re: Pitocin - STM
It's really commonly given with epidurals. I've read recently that half of women with epidurals get pitocin to keep things moving. It's less detrimental than using it to induce because you're already in labour - it's less likely to be a failed induction.
Dosage and patience also matter; jumping to too high a dose can lead to fetal distress and a section. Properly administered that's less of an issue.
There has been a recent study released saying Pitocin has adverse effects on full-term newborns: https://www.acog.org/About_ACOG/News_Room/News_Releases/2013/Study_Finds_Adverse_Effects_of_Pitocin_in_Newborns
Natural Birth Board FAQs
Cloth Diaper Review Sheet
My water broke on a Friday night.. I was told to wait for contractions or I would have to be induced 24 hours later. I didn't feel like I was having contractions so I waited till Saturday the next day to go in. Apparently I had been having them but didn't realize it, but they still gave me pitocin to speed things up so it didn't cause infection. They had to break the rest of my water and everything went fast from there.
I went to the hospital at 8pm on Saturday and have birth at 4 am on Sunday. Not 100 what it would have been like without the pitocin or how long labor would have been, I also didn't get an epidural.. Now that's just MY experience with it and it wasn't a negative experience. Like the pp's said it could have been because of the epidural.
getting an epi this time either. So nope I didn't have a positive experience.
IUI #4 BFP EDD 5.5.2012 m/c 10/1/2012
Surprise! BFP 12/4/12 EDD 8/8/2012
I have a girlfriend who was in prodromal labor for a month. A freaking month.
DD2 8.22.13
MMC 1.4.17 at 16w
Expecting #3, EDD 1.29.18
Izzy and Baby A ~ Adorable Punks
So when the doctor asked me what I wanted to do I opted for pitocin. Three hours later from pitocin kicking in I had DD in my arms. Labor and delivering vaginally with barely any tear. And DD scored 9 on her apgar. I would say that's a positive experience for me.
I was already 4cm and 90 since week 38, so maybe that helped? Who knows. Pitocin contractions really really really do hurt though. Like some PP said it generates intense and frequent contractions, you don't really get a moment to breathe and recover. I'd still do it again this time if circumstances are similar.
Edited to add apgar score after reading the pitocin article above haha.
Wow, just wow.
IUI #4 BFP EDD 5.5.2012 m/c 10/1/2012
Surprise! BFP 12/4/12 EDD 8/8/2012
Caleb Jonathan
Born November 30, 2011
The Winking of an Eye
A blog about the mommyhood, wifehood and lifehood of a misplaced Minnesotan in SoCal
I had a Pit Induction with my third (precipitous labor history) and I was able to go without the epi and the whole induction took 4 hours from me getting into my L&D room to birth. That was actually longer than I expected but obviously still pretty good. I had no issues nor did my baby.
I am not defending its use, just saying it doesn't always necessitate an epi or a c-section when used as an induction tool.
That said, I am always at least 3 cm dilated by 36 weeks so I am in a very favorable position to begin with.
They also gave me pitocin with my first when my water broke and 4 hours later my contractions were still very weak (dont get me wrong they hurt but not like they should have) and sporadic. I did get an epi that time (I was planning to anyway) and it all went fine. 13.5 hours start to finish for a first baby. Labor did not slow,but actually progressed better after pitocin was started. Again, not defending its use. Not a medical expert. But I do not associate it with pure evil like some seem to.
All 5 of my deliveries included pitocin. I was induced 4 times (using only pitocin), and the only child I wasn't induced with (#4) came 4 days before the planned induction, however I was given pitocin at some point to help things move along. I didn't have any pain meds/epidural etc. and I didn't find the "pitocin contractions" to be unbearable.
There are many factors that weigh in when you use pitocin:
1) moms who are over due who don't want to jump right to a csection might want to try to be induced, if they are not favorable for an induction, the pitocin isn't going to help, they will probably end up with a csection anyway.
2) moms who have to deliver early for a medical reason (pre-e, HELLP etc) but also don't want to jump to a csection, again the body might not be favorable and they might end up with a csection in the end as well.
3) moms who are favorable, but do not react well to the pitocin
I'm sure there are places that over use pitocin, but it really has a bad reputation because of all the misinformation out there. Pitocin only makes your body contract, if your cervix isn't softening/thinning/dilating you are literally just banging your babies head against your cervix over and over again.
I was induced and had pitocin (I was 2 weeks late) and it worked really well and pretty much text book. I was induced at 8am, contractions & dilation started almost immediately, I was 10cm by 5pm, and DD was born vaginally at 7:30pm after 2.5 hours of active pushing. She was very stubborn and didn't want to come out, but that wasn't the fault of the pit, and I couldn't have safely waited any longer to be induced.