I really like the name Kieran but I also know a woman named Karen so it makes me think that the name sounds feminine.
I am NOT suggesting that the name should ever be used for a girl. I just want to know if you think its "manly" enough to name a son?
Re: Is Kieran manly?
I think you are missing the point. For example, Julian is a boy name but many people think it sounds feminine...
I get what you're saying, I just disagree with you. I don't think Julian, Adrian, Tristan, or Gabriel sound feminine either. Manly doesn't always equal "macho" names like Cannon or Blade [exaggerated for emphasis, not saying those are your choices].
Yes I am aware.
To me, no.
I would lump Kieran with other male names that have a feminine feel to them?either because they are softer-sounding or because a female name exists that sounds similar.
Off the top of my head, others I that I can think of include Jasper and Tristan. That said, I wouldn't use any of those names on a girl, either. It's just a preference thing.
Meh...
While it absolutely is a boy name, I don't think it's overly "manly". I can't really explain why though. Although I do have a friend whose husband is Kieran, so maybe subconsciously I am thinking of him instead of the name.
It's not pronounced like Karen. It is a manly name.
EDIT I don't think of Karen when I hear it because it's spelled and pronounced differently. I don't think of it as feminine. I have known a few and none were especially feminine.
Yes, I think it sounds very masculine.
ETA: I agree with a previous post that stated masuline names don't have to be "macho" in order to be manly. I personally prefer names that are not "in your face".
This.
I don't get this argument that it's too close to Karen and Kiera. Is Stephen femenine because it's close to Stephanie?
It's not the most manly of names, no. It doesn't have the same masculine appeal of names like Charles, William, Benjamin, Jackson, etc...
I'm sorry but that comment gets an eyeroll from me. I just think it's ridiculous.
I plan to.
No need for yelling.
I totally agree. A lot of the responses in this post make me incredibly sad.
My Ovulation Chart Simple Link: My Ovulation Chart
No need to get into gender politics here, nor to suggest that little boys with un-masculine features should get beaten up. People on this board often refer to certain girls names as being very feminine (Isabella, Elizabeth, etc.), and it's silly to pretend that a similar continuum doesn't exist for boy names. Personally, I tend to like boy names with a little less of a masculine feel (Jude, Micah, etc.-- the only one that goes to far for my tastes is Tristan).
All that said, I don't see Kieran as being too feminine. In fact, as it ends in a schwa+ N syllable, it conforms to the current formula for male names, so I imagine that in time that syllable structure will be as strongly associated with masculinity as superfluous vowel sounds culminating in an A are associated with femininity.
see https://www.slate.com/articles/life/explainer/2012/05/baby_names_why_do_so_many_of_the_popular_ones_rhyme_.html
ETA: one could blow a hole into my logic by pointing out that Tristan has the same syllable structure....
Kieran
https://www.behindthename.com/name/kieran
I've personally never heard of Curin.
Yeah, this. Also, it's a completely different name. Kieran is Irish/Gaelic IIRC. Karen is Scandinavian and is a version of the name Catherine/Kathryn.
40/112
Oh...if cur in is the correct pronunciation for Kieran then, yes, it sounds like a girl name.
And I know I am not spelling the name I am thinking of correctly....maybe Corin or Keren?
https://www.behindthename.com/name/keren