Yup!! I read about this, and people need to be aware that it is happening more and more frequently. If the NCP is able to show that the CP is deliberately impeding on the NCP's relationship with the child(ren) then a change in custody is warranted.
wow. didn't get a chance to read the article, that is sad for kelly, but glad judges are starting to see more than just mom's way or the highway...
I don't think it's sad for her at all. She caused this. Had she put forth a genuine attempt to encourage and facilitate a relationship between the kids and their father, this wouldn't have happened. I feel sorry for the kids involved, but not the mother.
New SN? What did I miss? The link is not working.nbsp; Did I just fall for spam or something?
I think at some point I got logged out and made a new one and got back in, I did not realize I was not logged in correctly, the F'ing Bump and iPhone hate me and are not saving my password and keeping me logged it...anyone know how to fix that?
wow. didn't get a chance to read the article, that is sad for kelly, but glad judges are starting to see more than just mom's way or the highway...
I don't think it's sad for her at all. She caused this. Had she put forth a genuine attempt to encourage and facilitate a relationship between the kids and their father, this wouldn't have happened. I feel sorry for the kids involved, but not the mother.
The reason it seems sad in this situation is that if you read I cannot tell what his deal is, he does not fully seem on the up and up.
wow. didn't get a chance to read the article, that is sad for kelly, but glad judges are starting to see more than just mom's way or the highway...
I don't think it's sad for her at all. She caused this. Had she put forth a genuine attempt to encourage and facilitate a relationship between the kids and their father, this wouldn't have happened. I feel sorry for the kids involved, but not the mother.
The reason it seems sad in this situation is that if you read I cannot tell what his deal is, he does not fully seem on the up and up.
From what I remember when they were first separating/divorcing, she started putting up roadblocks right away in regards to him seeing the kids. Granted that was a few years back, but I think she tried making it so he would only see the kids like once a year and she wanted it supervised. It was very contentious from the beginning. If his Visa was revoked for reasons of illegal activity, the Judge wouldn't have ordered the way he did. Illegal activity would have been grounds for lowered visitation for the BD and she would have been awarded with primary custody.
The whole situation is awful, and clearly there are no "winners" here. It's the kids that lose out. But really, he's ordered to pay for basically all her travel and lodging expenses when she visits. That's going to add up really quickly.
She was actively trying to ruin their relationship. She was putting up roadblocks to their relationship. That is not ok and I don't think most CP do that. That is more than just not encouraging, that's trying to come between.
I think the CP should encourage a relationship with the NCP but the CP should not have to create the relationship.
wow. didn't get a chance to read the article, that is sad for kelly, but glad judges are starting to see more than just mom's way or the highway...
I don't think it's sad for her at all. She caused this. Had she put forth a genuine attempt to encourage and facilitate a relationship between the kids and their father, this wouldn't have happened. I feel sorry for the kids involved, but not the mother.
sorry I should have worded that better. no I do NOT condone her behavior. she was absolutely out of line. but I feel bad that she has to be separated from her kids like that, when in her mind she was just trying to protect them (although going about it in a completely inappropriate way) and you are right, the kids are the ones that really suffer. how unfortunate for them.
Re: For those that do not think you need to
Yup!! I read about this, and people need to be aware that it is happening more and more frequently. If the NCP is able to show that the CP is deliberately impeding on the NCP's relationship with the child(ren) then a change in custody is warranted.
Created by MyFitnessPal - Free Weight Loss Tools
I don't think it's sad for her at all. She caused this. Had she put forth a genuine attempt to encourage and facilitate a relationship between the kids and their father, this wouldn't have happened. I feel sorry for the kids involved, but not the mother.
Created by MyFitnessPal - Free Weight Loss Tools
I think at some point I got logged out and made a new one and got back in, I did not realize I was not logged in correctly, the F'ing Bump and iPhone hate me and are not saving my password and keeping me logged it...anyone know how to fix that?
The reason it seems sad in this situation is that if you read I cannot tell what his deal is, he does not fully seem on the up and up.
From what I remember when they were first separating/divorcing, she started putting up roadblocks right away in regards to him seeing the kids. Granted that was a few years back, but I think she tried making it so he would only see the kids like once a year and she wanted it supervised. It was very contentious from the beginning. If his Visa was revoked for reasons of illegal activity, the Judge wouldn't have ordered the way he did. Illegal activity would have been grounds for lowered visitation for the BD and she would have been awarded with primary custody.
The whole situation is awful, and clearly there are no "winners" here. It's the kids that lose out. But really, he's ordered to pay for basically all her travel and lodging expenses when she visits. That's going to add up really quickly.
Created by MyFitnessPal - Free Weight Loss Tools
She was actively trying to ruin their relationship. She was putting up roadblocks to their relationship. That is not ok and I don't think most CP do that. That is more than just not encouraging, that's trying to come between.
I think the CP should encourage a relationship with the NCP but the CP should not have to create the relationship.
sorry I should have worded that better. no I do NOT condone her behavior. she was absolutely out of line. but I feel bad that she has to be separated from her kids like that, when in her mind she was just trying to protect them (although going about it in a completely inappropriate way) and you are right, the kids are the ones that really suffer. how unfortunate for them.