I'm 16 weeks pregnant and starting to think about names for my baby. I, unfortunately, am no longer with the father nor do I want him in my childs life. However, before we ended things, he wanted the child's last name to be his, however, I believe the baby should have MY last name.
Was I in the wrong to want my child's last name the same as my own? Especially if I didn't see the father and I becoming an item (which I told him at the time)?
He practically yelled at me saying it was disrespectful and that it must be a "regional" thing to do that. He said he has plenty of guy friends with multiple children with multiple women and they all chose his last name.
I think it would be weird to have a child with a different last name.
Re: Baby's last name...
My child and I have different last names, but that's because I did not take my husband's last name.
I think the kid should have your last name. There's nothing weird about doing it either way, but if you're going to be the primary caregiver I would stand my ground and give him my name.
I think you're well within your rights to give your baby your last name, especially if you aren't with the father anymore. But it worries me that you say you don't want him around. Your baby didn't get to choose his/her father. S/he deserves two parents, no matter what you think. If the father chooses to stay away, that's his loss. You really should think about what's better for the child before you make any decisions about visitation.
If he really wants to see his kid, he can take you to court and unless he's a felon or otherwise a degenerate, he'll get visitation.
I would be careful with this one. If you agreed to this and are now having a change of heart, he can always have it ordered for the LN to be changed. One of DH's friends had an agreement with is DS's mom, she went back on it and when they went to court for custody, it was ordered for her to legally change the name to the one they agreed on.
That being said, if you don't want your LO to have his name, then don't give it. That does not make him any less the father of your LO.
Your point about having a child with a different last name, would be moot if you ever got married and changed your LN. Even if you didn't change yours and had other children, you still may not have the same LN as them. Just something to think about.
GL with whatever you decide.
"When the world says, 'Give up,' Hope whispers, 'Try one more time.'" -Anonymous
1) His friends sound like a bunch of whores.
2) I don't think you are in the wrong at all. If he is not in your child's life, why should they share a last name?
I think the baby should have your last name.
Yep. This.
just because you aren't with him anymore - doesn't mean he's not going to be a part of your child's life, right? if he is going to be in the child's life then i would use his last name.i think that's the right thing to do.
IF you don't think he's going to stick around and he's not going to be there for baby then I don't see anything wrong with using your last name.
If you are going to be raising the baby and he will only be around when he feels like it he has no right to anything in my opinion. I would give the baby your last name.
Now, if you are agreeing to some type of 50/50 custody I would hyphenate.
I agree too.
If the dad is going to be in the child's life then it would be a different thing. If he likely won't be then go ahead and give the baby your last name.
When I was preg with DS, the sperm donor wanted nothing to do with us, especially since he would tell everyone that it "wasn't his baby". So of course I knew that the best thing to do would be to give DS my last name. If he is going to treat you like that, you need to think about what is best for you and the baby, not some douche bag who has idiot friends who obviously can't keep their wieners where they should be and not inside every female they see.
Sorry I'm kinda grumpy this morning lol!
My husband has only seen his father a handful of time in 30 years, he has his Dads last name, when I asked how he would feel about taking mine since I am close to my father and he only has girls his response " If its the only thing my dad gave me I am fine with that, I am still part my dad I am happy to keep it and happy to give it to you" I don't have a point, but I think its neat how two people in similar situations can look at something so different. To poster, you never know if you child will decide to change their name on their own.
I think the child should have your last name. He won't be there through everything that your going to be going through with this pregnancy. He won't be there for the birth and chances are he won't be there during any other part of the child's life. So why go through the hassle of it having a guys last name that it won't ever know.
It's not really weird, though, to have a different last name then your child's. My last name was different from my DS's until September (when he was 16 months old) when DH & I got married.
Maybe you should ask this question on the Single Parents board, I imagine they have dealt with similar issues.
If I were you, I'd definitely give the baby your last name. Even if the father plans to be in the baby's life, if you are the primary caregiver, the baby should have your name. From what I understand if you give the baby the dad's last name and then ever want to change it (like if the dad drops out of the picture, or you get married and want to change your name) it is very very difficult to change the baby's name if it's not your last name.
And totally agreed on pps comment about daddy's friends whoring around...are you kidding me?? His friends can't keep it in their pants and they're his argument for the baby taking his last name? Ick.
I think there is nothing wrong with using your name, especially considering you were never married.
But I will say that my son and I do not share last names. He has my husband's and I didn't take it. It is not weird to me at all.
If the dad and his family is going to play an active role in the baby's life, I would consider compromising about the name though. If not using his completely, maybe using both in some way?
I would totally give the child your last name.
Also, get a lawyer and get support for this child nailed down!
Best of luck in a difficult situation.
Do you believe he will play an active role in this child's life? Statistically, the chances are slim, but it is possible that he will step up to the plate and be the father he should be to this child.
I believe in father's rights, and I believe that a father is just as rightful to make parenting choices as a mother--- however all that goes out the window if either of the parents abandons the child.
Would you consider a hyphenated last name?
Maybe you should just wait and see what happens as the pregnancy goes along. You don't have to figure this out right now. If he is supportive and present during the pregnancy and delivery, then you might consider hyphenating. If he doesn't play an active role during pregnancy and delivery (provided you give him the chance, of course), then there's no reason to believe that he's going to start being responsible after the baby is born.
The father lives 3 hours away... he "says" he's going to move closer to be here for the baby, but he has absolutely NO money to find a place or a job in 5 months. I just don't see anything GOOD happening if I keep him in the baby's life.
Yes, I realize he's the father, but if he keeps working 2nd shift, 3 hours away, he won't be seeing the baby anyways.
It's definitely a hard decision for me to make, but I feel like the toxic part of our past relationship will ruin a lot of things, and I don't want that for my child. I don't want my kid growing up with an absent father or a weekend father... I'd much rather do this on my own and find someone who actually cares for me and my child.